Transcript Document

Introduction to Study of Economic
Impacts of Enhanced Aquifer
Protection
Presented by
Ed Harvey and Doug Jeavons
BBC Research & Consulting
3773 Cherry Creek N. Drive
Suite 850
Denver, Colorado 80209
www.bbcresearch.com
November 17, 2000
The Study Team

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
 Sponsoring agency, contract manager

BBC Research & Consulting (Denver)
 Natural resource economic and financial
consultants

ERO Resources (Boise)
 Geohydrology and environmental science
engineers

Idaho Legislature, citizens of Pocatello and
Bannock County
 Audience
Why Do This Study?
A. Increasing demands and declining water quality
in LPRV aquifer
B. Potential for conflict between growth,
development and water quality objectives
C. Need for a comprehensive view of protection
alternatives and their impacts
D. Desire to avoid or minimize unintended
consequences
Study Objectives
1. Characterize enhanced aquifer protection
2. Describe baseline scenario without enhanced
protection
3. Examine economic and fiscal impacts, costs
and benefits of enhanced protection
Simplified View of the Water Use Cycle
in the LPRV
Groundwater/
Surface Water
Supply
Water
Treatment
Water Quality
Changes Over
Time
Precipitation
Distribution
System
Land Use, Economic/
Demographic Activity
Return Flows/
Storm Runoff
Recharge/
Pollutant
Percolation
Waste Water
Collection
Septic
Treatment and
Discharge
Economic Implications of Strategies to Address
Water Quality Deterioration in the LPRV
Strategy
New groundwater
supplies developed
Effect
Higher costs
for water
utilities



Additional
conveyance,
distributions systems
from new supplies
Impact
Surface or other water
supplies pursued
Diminished
quality water
consumed
Higher water rates and
fees to consumers
Household/ Business
costs from using poor
water
Reduced economic
activity
Less water
available for
consumers
Reduced water
availability
Enhanced water
treatment facilities
constructed
Task 1 – Characterization of Enhanced Aquifer
Protection Relative to Current Status

Rathdrum Prairie sensitive resource
examination

Identification of existing LPRV water quality
issues and measures to address them

Definition of implementation scenario
Task 2 – Description of Baseline Scenario
Without Enhanced Aquifer Protection

Current profile

Land Use

Economic/demographic activity

Water needs

Characterization of water supply sources

Water use discharge

Utility costs and other fiscal conditions

Household water user costs

Planning horizon definition

Baseline projections
Task 3 – Economic and Fiscal Impact
Analysis of Enhanced Aquifer Protection

Completion of the Rathdrum Prairie Case Study

Projected changes in hydrologic conditions

Changes in utility costs

Impacts on LPRV residents and other water users

Projected impacts on:

Land use changes

Economic activity

Demographic changes

Fiscal impacts

Scenario comparison

Cost benefit analysis

Draft report
Timeline


Task 1 Working Paper/Legislative Progress
Report

Late December 2000

ID areas in need of further examination
after this study
Task 2 Working Paper


Task 3 Working Paper


Late February 2001
April 2001
Presentations and Final Report

April/May 2001
How Far Will This Study Take Us?

The first shot at an enhanced aquifer protection
scenario will be developed

Generalized estimates of hydrologic/water
quality effects over time will be developed, with
and without enhanced aquifer protection

Key economic and fiscal impacts, costs and
benefits will be identified
A Plea For Realistic Study Expectations
1. Time and financial resources are limited
2. Issues will be uncovered during course of work
3. All of the questions will not be answered in the
Spring 2001 Report, but the costs and benefits
of aquifer protection will be evident
4. Further inquiry and additional public input are
possible after the Spring 2001 Report is
completed
We Want to Hear From You!
A. What did we leave out in the work scope?
B. What are the data and information sources we
should rely on?
C. What are the key concerns with groundwater
degradation?
D. What are the key concerns with aquifer
protection?