Sakai Overview - Hosei

Download Report

Transcript Sakai Overview - Hosei

Sakai Project Overview

TERENA (Trans-European Research and Education Networking Association) Poznan, Poland June 6, 2005 KYOU / sakai Joseph Hardin, University of Michigan School of Information Sakai Board Chair Boundary, Situation

Building Open Source Educational and Research Infrastructure • Course Management Systems are now a central part of a university’s services • Remote research collaboration tools are becoming essential for participation in national and international projects - for faculty of all schools

The Sakai Project provides both in what we call a Collaboration and Learning Environment (CLE) 2

Online Collaboration and Learning Environments are Key Tools for all our Faculty, Staff, Students now. Everyone uses them.

100% Students Faculty Courses We’re experiencing rapid, continuing growth in adoption and use. Just keeps growing.

3

Challenges for Higher Education Online Learning & Research

We must push the frontiers of innovation for users, getting faculty innovations in teaching and research available to a large community rapidly; in addition to providing basic, reliable services We must deliver sustainable economics to large university systems, lowering the cost of key infrastructure as much as possible, while delivering innovation

4

Supporting the Class

Sakai as Course Management System (CMS) 5

Supporting the Lab

Sakai as collaboratories - support for online research teams 6

So, The Sakai Project - 2004

“The University of Michigan, Indiana University, MIT, Stanford, the uPortal Consortium, and the Open Knowledge Initiative (OKI) are joining forces to integrate and synchronize their considerable educational software into a

pre-integrated collection of open source tools

.” (January, 2004)

Sakai Project receives $2.4 million grant from Mellon Foundation; support from Hewlett Foundation

7

Initial Sakai Funding

• Each of the 4 Core Universities Commits – 5+ developers/architects, etc. under Sakai Board project direction for 2 years – Public commitment to implement Sakai – Open/Open licensing – “Community Source” • So, overall project levels – $4.4M in institutional staff (27 FTE) – $2.4M Mellon, $300K Hewlett (first year) – Additional investment through partners Heavy commitment from founding schools 8

Why: All the simple reasons

These are core infrastructures at our Universities • Economic advantages to core schools, partners • Higher ed values – open, sharing, building the commons – core support for collaboration tech • We should be good at this – teaching, research are our core competencies • Maintains institutional capacity, independence • Ability to rapidly innovate – move our tools within/among HE institutions rapidly Based on goals of interoperability Desire to harvest research advances and faculty innovation in teaching quickly 9

Sakai Project Timeline (Aggressive)

July 04 May 05 Dec 05 Jan 04 Michigan

•CHEF Framework •CourseTools •WorkTools

Indiana

•Navigo Assessment OneStart •Oncourse

MIT

•Stellar

Stanford

•CourseWork •Assessment

OKI

•OSIDs

uPortal SAKAI 1.0 Release

•Tool Portability Profile •Framework •Services-based Portal •Refined OSIDs & implementations

SAKAI Tools

•Complete CLE •Assessment

SAKAI 2.0 Release

•Tool Portability Profile •Framework •Services-based Portal

SAKAI Tools

•Complete CLE •Assessment Tool •Research Tools •Authoring Tools

Activity: Ongoing implementation work at local institutions…

Primary SAKAI Activity Designing, Building, Refining SAKAI Framework, Tuning and conforming additional tools Intensive community building/training

Activity: Maintenance & Transition from a project to a community

10

Sakai Project Deliverables

Working Code

– CMS/CLE- Collaboration and Learning Environment – Sakai 1.0 – Modular Tools + Framework • Course management system – core tools plus • Quizzing and assessment tools, [OSPI], etc • Research collaboration support • Portal (uPortal 2.3, 3.x)

Tool Portability Profile

• Specifications for writing portable software to achieve application ‘code mobility’ among institutions – modular tools and services

Synchronized development, adoptions

at: Michigan, Indiana, MIT, Stanford – Sakai 1.0 is next generation CourseWork, CHEF, Oncourse, Stellar

Sakai Community –

Committed and active 11

Basic Sakai Strategy

• • • • • •

Partner with like minded institutions Build an open, world-class system Use/develop open source products Build framework for easy tool building Build international community of adopters and contributors Move innovation into tools quickly Build the Open Source Community

12

So, What is Sakai?

• Sakai is a

project

– an initial grant for two years • Sakai is an extensible

framework

- provides basic capabilities to support a wide range of tools and services – teaching and research • Sakai is a set of

tools

- written and supported by various groups and individuals • Sakai is a

product

- a released bundle of the framework and a set of tools which have been tested and released as a unit • Sakai is a

community

– an emerging group of people and resources supporting the code and each other, realizing large scale Open Source efficiencies in Higher Ed 13

Sakai Technical Goals

Provide environment

• to write tools and services which seamlessly move from one Sakai deployment to another – tool portability • where the addition of a new tool does not de-stabilize the existing tools – modularization • to allow tools to exist both within Sakai and stand-alone (I.e. easy porting of external tools into Sakai without requiring rewrite – well, minimal rewrite) • and capabilities so that Sakai services and tools can be accessed using web services.

14

Sakai Foundational Documents

• • •

Sakai Style Guide

- Describes in detail how Sakai tools are to look and operate regardless of implementation technology

Sakai Java Framework

- Describes the Sakai Application Framework (SAF) as implemented in Java

Sakai Tool Portability Profile

- Describes how to write tools and services to be portable across Sakai systems (in progress) 15

Service Oriented Architecture

• Decompose tool code into presentation elements and service elements • Provides an abstraction (API) which shields the tool code from the implementation details of the service code.

• Allows separate development of tools & services.

• Allows effective unit testing of services • Allows an implementation to be replaced transparently with another implementation as long as the API contract is fully met – e.g., choice of many ‘Discussion Tools’ for users 16

Sakai Application Framework

• SAF - Kernel - An augmented web application which enables the Sakai APIs to be called from the web application - this is a rich but not constraining environment • SAF - Common Services - A set of common services available to all tools (authentication, authorization, hierarchy, repository, others) • SAF - Presentation Services - A set of Sakai specific JSF tags to handle presentation details and provide widgets such as a date-picker or WSYWIG editor.

17

Sakai Integration and Development Choices

• Develop a TPP Compliant Tool Assured to be portable across Sakai environments • Integrate a web application – Responsible for own presentation and compliance to style guide (may use Sakai JSF tags if JSF is used) – Can operate both stand-alone and within Sakai • Integrate via web-services • Capability being developed 18

But, More than a CMS

Sakai is more than Course Management System.

Sakai = Collaboration & Learning Environment Meant to support the full spectrum of scholarly activities, and leverage adoption across them • Support for teaching/learning • Support for online research communities, faculty, research staff, and students • Support for Staff – eg, project work, surveys, etc All of this made easier by the ability of any user to set up a group workspace.

19

Sakai in Production at UM, IU Now

• We have about 25,000 people using CTools in at least one course at UM. That is about ~54% of candidate users at University of Michigan. • There are over 1000 course sites representing nearly 2000 sections this term.

• Our transition from the legacy system will be complete this Fall, 2005; legacy system ‘turned off’; then we are all Sakai/Ctools at UMichigan

Doing fine…

20

Building the Sakai Community

• •

Developer and Adopter Support for Universities SEPP

Sakai Educational Partner’s Program Community for ongoing development, adoption, support

Commercial Support

– Sakai Commercial Affiliates Based on open-open licensing – open source, open for commercialization

SCA

• – Fee-based services from vendors include…

Installation/integration, on-going support, training

Think of as “Sakai Red Hats” Also, IMS

Global Learning Consortium – building standards; working with CLE/CMS vendors on interoperability between frameworks, e.g., WebCT, BlackBoard, Sun, Cisco Learning, etc.

21

Sakai Educational Partner’s Program

Developing the Community to Guide the Source.

• • • • Membership Fee: US$10K per year ($5K for smaller schools), 3 years

Access to SEPP staff

– Community development liaison – SEPP developers, documentation writers

Invitation to Sakai Partners Conferences

– Developer training for the TPP, tool development – Strategy and implementation workshops – Software exchange for partner-developed tools

Seat at the Table as Sakai Develops

The success of the SEPP effort will determine the long term success of the project.

22

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Sakai Educational Partners – April 1, 2004

Arizona State University Boston University School of Management Brown University Carleton College Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching Carnegie Mellon University Coastline Community College Columbia University Community College of Southern Nevada Cornell University Dartmouth College Florida Community College/Jacksonville Foothill-De Anza Community College Franklin University Georgetown University Harvard University Hosei University IT Research Center Johns Hopkins University Lubeck University of Applied Sciences Maricopa County Community College Monash University Nagoya University New York University Northeastern University North-West University (SA) Northwestern University Ohio State University Portland State University Princeton University Roskilde University (Denmark) Rutgers University Simon Fraser University State University of New York

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Stockholm University SURF/University of Amsterdam Tufts University Universidad Politecnica de Valencia (Spain) Universitat de Lleida (Spain) University of Arizona University of California Berkeley University of California, Davis University of California, Los Angeles University of California, Merced University of California, Santa Barbara University of Cambridge, CARET University of Cape Town, SA University of Colorado at Boulder University of Delaware University of Hawaii University of Hull University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign University of Minnesota University of Missouri University of Nebraska University of Oklahoma University of Texas at Austin University of Virginia University of Washington University of Wisconsin, Madison Virginia Polytechnic Institute/University Whitman College Yale University

• •

New University of Melbourne, Australia University of Toronto, Knowledge Media Design Institute

23

Known Pilots and Production

• • • • • • • • • • Boston University School of Management Carleton College Foothill-De Anza Community College District Indiana University Johns Hopkins University Lübeck University of Applied Sciences, Germany Massachusetts Institute of Technology Northwestern University Rutgers Stanford University • • • • • • • • • • University of California, Berkeley University of California, Merced University of Cape Town, SA University Fernando Pessoa, Portugal University of Lleida, Spain University of Michigan University of Missouri University of Virginia Whitman College Yale University Growing pretty quickly.

Some Sakai Partner Projects: Examples of Early Community Contributions to the Sakai Project

25

The Berkeley Grade Book University of California, Berkeley funded development of an on-line grade book.

The UC Berkeley grade book is now in pilot on the Berkeley campus as a stand alone tool, and moving into pilot at IU.

It is part of the 1.5 release.

26

Grad Tools

The University of Michigan’s Grad Tools provides doctoral students and faculty a way of tracking degree progress from the point of choosing an advisor to degree conferral.

Doctoral students create their own site, which contains an automatically personalized dissertation checklist based on data from their department and from the graduate school. Students control access to their Grad Tools site, and use collaboration features common to CTools, including file storage, group email, email notification, structured discussion, and more.

27

Keeping track of student progress toward a degree.

More time for learning, and teaching.

28

Samigo – Testing and Assessment 29

Melete – Online Lesson Authoring Tool – Part of ETUDES Project

Foothill College’s Melete, an online lesson authoring environment, is the classroom component of ETUDES (Easy to Use Distance Education Software) that is being rewritten in Java for Sakai-based ETUDES-NG. Melete offers instructors the ability to author online learning modules. Melete features extra controls to assist online teachers/learners, such as the ability to set prerequisites and the pacing of material.

The Hewlett Foundation funded deployment of Sakai for the service provided to 48 California community colleges.

Part of 2.0 release 30

ETUDES Consortium – Sakai Pilots to Production

300 faculty from 17 community colleges (highlighted in red on next slide) from the ETUDES Alliance have committed to a pilot of ETUDES-NG (Sakai 1.5 + Samigo + Melete) in the spring and summer of 2005. Three colleges will go into production in the fall. More to follow in the spring. All 48 colleges migrate to Sakai by July 1, 2007.

31

Skins at Course Site Level

32

Melete – Lesson Builder

33

Composing

content online using a WYSIWYG Editor This is MELETE

Uploading

all types of documents for lesson components/content

Linking

to websites to supplement or support the content of a lesson 34

Ability to check for lack of compliance with

Section 508 accessibility guidelines Accessibility

metadata Will plug in to TILE from U Toronto.

35

Student View – Navigation & Licensing content

Navigation

is created automatically Authors can

license

their content 36

Open Source Portfolio Initiative (OSPI)

OSPI is a community of individuals and organizations collaborating on the development of the leading open source electronic portfolio software. The Open Source Portfolio software is individual-centered, enabling users to gather work products and other artifacts to be stored and shared with others, and used for personal growth and development. The ePortfolio toolset is being developed on the Sakai infrastructure providing a stand alone application as well as an integration of rich portfolio tools in the full suite of Sakai applications.

See www.theospi.org

Tracking Sakai releases – 1.5 and 2.0

37

All these are examples of distributed development of innovation – Sakai Partners building new tools, and sharing them immediately with the community, through the Sakai platform.

38

Building Contribution Community

• Receiving code fixes and folding them in • Receiving large tools and working to integrate them effectively – XWiki – Blog – Jabber Instant Messaging – SCORM player – RDF-based visual concept mapper Rapidly growing area. Possible because we’re open source. Thus anyone can contribute. Necessary to achieve goal of rapid innovation within mature system. We filter contributions to

SCA – Sakai Commercial Affiliates

First Generation – Open Source Software Support

Support for the Sakai codebase, or support of Sakai users = SCA Member

40

Sakai Commercial Affiliate Proposal “IBM and Sakai: Building a Successful Learning Ecosystem

‘Second Generation’ SCA Partners

41

• • • • • • • • •

Open Source Business and Learning Solutions Interoperable Learning Content Reference Architecture SW Stack and Offering HW Stack and Offering Hosting Stack and Offering Code Donations ‘Commercial’ SW Expertise Global Marketing and Sales

Both universities and commercial partners contributing code and expertise. Benefit of open source strategy.

42

and, recently… • Sun • Apple • Unisys

Are also asking about joining the Sakai Commercial Affiliates, and proposing to do similar things with the Sakai Community Validation of Open Source Model…

?

Open Source Dynamics

• Open Source Projects are crucial to supporting innovation in higher ed • We have some examples now of ‘for higher ed, by higher ed’ OS efforts • A literature is developing around the dynamics of open source communities Steven Weber • We learn from experience and add to our common stock of knowledge; we are learning institutions, after all.

The Sakai Project is a pioneer in this, devising its own open source strategy: Community Source.

44

• •

Part of Much larger Whole

Multiplying Open/Community Source Efforts

• integration, standards…innovation

Figuring out how to work together

• Development, operations, maintenance, timing, evolution, building open source community in HE Chandler/Westwood PKI

Dartmouth

45

46

So, join the Sakai Community

• Main site: www.sakaiproject.org

• Bugs: bugs.sakaiproject.org – open, active • Sakai-wide collaboration area – outward looking – collab.sakaiproject.org; sakai work sites, discussion lists, resources areas; working instance of Sakai – [email protected]

– open mail list, active – [email protected]

– open mail list, active • Sakai Educational Partners (SEPP) – Separate mailing lists, discussion areas; for internal use – Dedicated staff – technical and admin support – Two conferences per year; regular VTCs, phone calls 47

Summer Conference 2005

Conference Co-Chairs SEPP Partners – Yale and Cambridge Technical Description of 2.0 3.0 Dev & Contrib Processes Governance Discussion Underway Now Baltimore, MD, USA June 8-10 (soon) Over 400 attendees 14 countries, 31 states, 5 continents 48

(Aside) What’s in a Name?

A little history – the Sakai Project had the Chef Project as one of its precursors.

Chef = CompreHensive collaborativE Framework We named it that way for fun – we liked the Japanese ‘Iron Chef’ TV show.

SAKAI at one time meant: Synchronized Architecture for Knowledge Acquisition Infrastructure – too big a mouthful!

Now it is just ‘ Sakai ’ without all capital letters. It is just a nice word. We like the sound.

49

But, it is also…

The name of a famous Iron Chef. (More fun!) It is also: Which has connotations, we are told, of moving across boundaries, of being involved in a complex situation.

Appropriate for us.

50

Thank You sakaiproject.org

51

52

53