Port Facility Security Compliance with ISPS/SOLAS

Download Report

Transcript Port Facility Security Compliance with ISPS/SOLAS

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
28th
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting
Vancouver, Canada
5-8 September 2006
Progress and Future Plan of
ASEAN-Japan Regional Action Plan
on Port Security
Yasuyuki NISHIO
Senior Coordinator for International Affairs, Ports & Harbours Bureau
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan
MLIT-Japan
1
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
ASEAN/Japan Maritime Transport Security Program (AJMT-2)
A/J 1st Seminar on Maritime Security and Combating Piracy (2003.12)
Seminar in Indonesia (2004.3)
A/J Seminar in Cambodia (2004.5)
A/J WS in Philippines (2004.4)
A/J WS in Vietnam (2004.6)
A/J Seminar in Myanmar (2004.5)
2004.7- SOLAS/ISPS entered into force
1st stage:
How to comply
with SOLAS
A/J 2nd Seminar on Maritime Security and Combating Piracy (2005.3)
2005.10 JICA Training Course on Port Facility Security
2nd stage:
How effectively &
continuously
implement SOLAS
A/J Seminar/WS in Thailand (2005.7)
WS in Myanmar (2005.11)
APEC WS in Vietnam (2005.12)
JICA/APEC Seminar in Indonesia (2005.12)
A/J Seminar in Cambodia (2006.4)
APEC Seminar in Malaysia (2006.6)
ASEAN-Japan Regional Action Plan on Port Security
3rd stage:
How to check &
upgrade security
MLIT-Japan
2
measures
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
Processes for preparing
ASEAN Japan Regional Action Plan on Port Security
<Background>
 The idea of RAP was proposed at “A/J Dialog on Port Security” (on Oct
2005 in Tokyo) and approved as 2005-06 work-plan at ATM on Nov 2005.
<Preparation of IAPs>
 Each country (inc. Japan) is requested to prepare its draft individual
country’s action plan (IAP) in accordance with the provided template.
<Draft RAP & discussion at expert meeting >
 Based on the IAPs, MLIT prepares a draft RAP. The draft plan will be
discussed at “A/J Port Security Experts Meeting” held in Bangkok on 1011 April 2006.
<Finalization & approval>
 Based on the draft RAP, each country will get each Gov’s approval of its IAP.
An ad-hoc meeting might be held during APEC Transportation WG27 Hanoi
on May 2006 if major amendments are required. Finalized RAP was
submitted to “A/J Transport Policy WS” held in Miyazaki-Japan on June
2006 for approval. The approved RAP will also be submitted to STOM/ATM
held in Bangkok on November 2006.
MLIT-Japan
3
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
ASEAN-Japan Regional Action Plan on Port Security (RAPPS)

Consist of Individual country’s & collective action plan
aiming at enhancing port security in the region under A/J
Maritime Security Program (focusing on port security)

The goal of the RAP is to establish PDCA (Plan-DoCheck-Action) cycle to enable effective and continuous
implementation of security measures at port facilities in
each country

The plan starts from 2006 and ends in 2009 (to review & if
necessary, upgrade PFSP by July 2009)

Non-binding and open plan, basically unclassified
MLIT-Japan
4
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
Sample of Individual Action Plan
II.
Ensuring effective & continues implementation of security measures at port facilities
Action Items
Action taken so far
Remaining issues and future actions
(with timeline)
a) Developing capacity
of PFSOs and
security personnel
- Continuous conduct of training for PFSO and
port security personnel
- Competency of PFSO is tested thru
verification/audit of their port facility
- Training of other personnel performing
port security duties
- Will develop advance PFSO Course
centered on Plan implementation, review
b) Ensuring
implementation of
exercises and drills
- Records of exercises and drills are being
looked into during verification/audit of the
- Conduct training in the proper conduct of
drills and exercises
- Require facilities to conduct regular
drills and exercises
c) Ensuring smooth
Inter-agency
coordination
- Encouraged Port Facilities to regularly
convene their Port Security Advisory
- Encouraged all PFSOs to include in their
Port Facility Security Advisory Committee
(PFSAC) all other agencies involved in Port
operations and security matters as
Monitor port facilities having problem on
Inter-agency coordination
d) Testing the
effectiveness of the
PFSPs
- Prior to approval of PFSP,
verification/audit of the Port Facility is
done to determine if what are written are
- Regular conduct of verification/audit of
Port Facilities
- PFSAs are reviewed to determine if there is
a need to update same and as a means of
enhancing the effectiveness of PFSP
- Continue conduct audit of port facilities
- Require port facilities to conduct
Assistance needs
- Provide
training in the
planning and
proper
execution of
drills and
exercises
- Report on
observation of
foreign ships
MLIT-Japan
5
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
Collective Actions

Holding Training Courses, Seminars and Workshops

Developing Tools





Manuals for PFSA &PFSP
Manuals for Declaration of Security (DoS)
Standard Specification of Security Equipment & Facilities
Good Practices Book
Joint Communication Exercise
MLIT-Japan
6
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
The 2nd ASEAN-Japan Port Security Experts Meeting
1. Schedule: October 10-12, 2006
2. Venue: Yokohama, Japan
3. Invited Countries: ASEAN (Singapore will join as lecturers)
4. Agenda
(1) Development manuals & standard
Development manuals for PFSA, PFSP, DoS
Development standard specification of security equipment and facilities
(2) Joint communication exercise
Planning & coordinating joint communication exercise among member
countries
(3) Site visit
Site visit to port facilities at Yokohama port
MLIT-Japan
7
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
Image of ASEAN-Japan Joint Communication Exercise
on Port Security Incident
ASEAN+Japan
Receive incident information from
Indonesian DA
Disseminate the information to the
domestic facilities and instruct search
Gather feedbacks and check the
Bangkok
effectiveness of domestic
Laem Chabang
communication network in each country
Tokyo
Cai Lan
Haiphong
Tokyo
Danang
Subic
Manila
Batangas
Other Ports
Even if the relevant ships
do not call the country,
may instruct domestic
facilities to check the
facilities considering that
suspicious cargo might
be T/S
Ho Chi Minh
Cebu
Sianoukville
Mindanao
Penang
Port Klang
Muara
Tanjung Pelapas
Singapore
Tanjung Priok
Shipping lane
Port
Tanjung Perak
Indonesia
Threat information obtained (bomb)
Incident occurred (unloaded container exploded at a container yard,
other suspicious cargo might be already unloaded at other countries)
Communicate incident information to other domestic ports and other
countries (date, facility, outline, calling vessels etc.)
Japan
Advise to the exercise
Find problems through
debriefing
Point out howMLIT-Japan
to improve 8
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
The 2nd JICA Training Course on Port Facility Security
1. Schedule: October 1, 2006 – October 21, 2006
2. Venue: JICA Yokohama Centre, Japan
3. Invited Countries: ASEAN (Singapore will join as lecturers)
4. Curriculum
(1) Basic knowledge
Basic knowledge on ISPS, security regime and initiative under IMO and
major countries
including Japan, security threat and terrorist activity
(2) Table-top exercise
Table-top exercise by role-playing the key players on port security
(3) Site visit
Site visit to various types of port facilities at Yokohama and Nagoya ports
(4) Application
Interactive exercises on PFSA, PFSP and Audits
MLIT-Japan
9
2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/042
Act Together,
advance together !
Terima Kashi
MLIT-Japan
10