暴涨宇宙学与暗能量

Download Report

Transcript 暴涨宇宙学与暗能量

Interacting Dark Energy
Xinmin Zhang
Institute of High Energy Physics
Beijing
June 18, 2004
* Recent years Cosmology made big progress
DE (73%)  DM (23%)   B (4%)
* 4%: Particles in the standard model
but why no antimatter?
* Understanding the Dark Sector: Challenges to particle physics
Dark Matter:
Favored candidates:
Axion
Neutralino
Thermal Production & Non-thermal Production
For ex: consider a model with extra U (1)
B-L
U (1) broken
B-L
neutrino masses & cosmic string
Jeannerot,
String loop decay N R  l  h
~
~ Brandenberger
 l  h &Zhang, Jan. 1999
Thermal production
Non-thermal
1,
2, enhancing the parameter space

q

q
Weak interactions
3,
cold dark matter


q
q



q
q
“stronger” interactions
warm dark matter
CDM: “Nagging Problems”
•Prediction of cuspy dark halos
•Apparent prediction of too much substructures
thermal
Non-thermal
• Astrophysical explanations
Lin, Huang, Zhang & Brandenberger,
• Particle physics
PRL (2001)
Dark Energy:
* Negative pressure:
 / a  
a
4G
(   3 p)
3
   3 p  0 w  p /   1 / 3
* Smoothly distributed, (almost ) not clustering
Candidates:
* Cosmological constant (or vacuum Energy)
  0
a
T 

g 
8G
  p 
w  p /   1

 ( 2  103 eV ) 4
8G

m ~ 10-3 eV
But:  th /  ob ~ 10120 , cosmological problem!
* Dynamical Field: Quintessence, K-essence, Phantom etc
L
1
2 V, p  1 Q
 2 V
  Q  Q  V (Q )  Q  1 Q
Q
2
2
2
 1  wQ  1
Outline of this talk on Interacting DE
•Very briefly review on the current constraints on Dark Energy (Feng, Wang and
•A model of unifying DE (73%)
and  B (4%)
Zhang)
In the framework of Quintessence, introducing coupling:
•A model of neutrinos with varying masses
(Li, Feng Wang and Zhang)
Since the scale of DE,
Only comparable with mν, interesting to speculate on the possible
connection betweens the two:
Interaction between the neutrino and DE:
(Gu, Wang and Zhang)
•A model of DE and DM:
SUSY fermionic partner of Quintessence,Quintessino as DM particle
•Summary
(Bi, Li and Zhang)
Constraints on the Dark Energy
A quantity characterizing the property of Dark Energy:
Equation of state: w(Z)=P/ρ
For example :
* Vacuum Energy: w=-1
* Quintessence:
* Phantom:
Model independent analysis with the following parameterization:
1,w(z)=w_0 + w_1* z
2,w(z)=w_1 + w_a*z/(1+z) (E.Linder)
Using the recent 157 Supernova data published by Riess et al.
astro-ph/0402512)
* Within 2 σ, the cosmological constant fits well the data
* Data mildly favors a running of the W across -1
Feng, Wang &
Zhang
Astro-ph/0404224
Huterer & Cooray
Astro-ph/0404062
If the running of w(Z), especially a transition across –1, confirmed
in the future, big challenge to the model building
* Vacuum :
w=-1
* Quintessence:
* Phantom:
A new scenanio of Dark Energy : Quintom (Zhang et al.)
For ex:
single scalar:
multi-scalar:
Interacting Quintessence
* If Quintessence –like scalar field responsible for the current
acceleration of the Universe ,expected also to interact with the
matter directly. Open new possibilities for the detection.
*
Direct coupling with ordinary matter
Constraint from the limits on the long-range force
*
Interaction with derivative
Goldstone theorem: Spin-dependent force
a unified model of DE and Baryo(Lepto)genesis
Quintessino as DM
*
Interacting with DM
*
Interacting with neutrinos: mass varying neutrino
(Peebles et al )
Quintessential Baryogenesis
M.Li, X.Wang, B.Feng, X. Zhang PRD65,103511 (2002);
M.Li & X. Zhang, PLB573,20 (2003)
Lint  c
 Q
M
J B
In thermo equilibrium

Cohen & Kaplan
1/ 2
gb 
2
2
1
1
nB  b  nb 
E
(
E

m
)
dE

[

1

exp[(
E


)
/
T
]
1

exp[(
E
 b ) / T ] ]
2 m
b
2
T 2
g bT 3  b
b 3
g bQ

[
 O( ) ]  c
6
T
T
6M
2 2
s
gT 3
45
The value of

15c g bQ
  nB / s 
4 2 g MT
depends on the model of Quintessence
model:V (Q)  f (Q) Exp[( / mpl )Q] Albrecht & Skordis

Solution:Q 
PRL84,2076(2000)
4
3
1/ 2
10(2  4)
g
T2
Tracking
T
  0.01c
M
Decoupling T:B (TD )  H (TD )
 (TD )  0.01c
TD
 10 10
M
If B-violation is due to electroweak sphalerons T about 100 GeV
D
requires
Quintessential leptogenesis & neutrino mass limits
Lint  c
Q
M
J B L
Similarly:
TD determined by
L (TD )  H (TD )
which gives
for degenerate neutrino masses:
defining
m
i
i
Cosmological limits give
WMAP: TD  2.5 10 GeV
11
SDSS:
where
and
12
10
GeV 1/ 2 2
2
m

(
0
.
2
eV
(
) )

i
TD
i

 (TD )  0.01c
TD  4.2 10 GeV
10
L

TD
 10 10
M
T3
~ 0.0 4
f 2
l LlL
v2
 m ~
f
f
Minimal model of Baryogenesis
* In the Quintessence as Dark Energy scenario, this is the minimal model for
Baryogenesis in the sense that no extra particle beyond the standard model is
introduced .
* In ΛCDM model,
with f(R): function of Ricci scalar,
I.
If
,
Einstein equation give:
so, in radiation dominant Universe,
II.
Davoudiasl,Kitano,Kribs
Murayama and Steinhardt
We propose
, so
generating n /s naturally!
B
H.Li, M.Li,X.Zhang
Mass varying Neutrinos
• Motivations:
smaller than any scale in the particle Physics, however
comparable with neutrino masses
•
Any connection between the two?
Neutrino interacting with the Dark Energy
• In the Quintessence-like models for Dark Energy:
Possible couplings:
Or in the see-saw model:
Implication for Leptogenesis!
Where,
Corresponding the formula for the neutrino
mass upper limit now is:
Including the back reaction
Bi,Feng,Li,and
Zhang, in preparation
R.Fordon, A.Nelson and N. Weiner consider a case with δ, c=0
R. D. Peccei hep-ph/0404277
Quintessino As Dark Matter
•If susying the Quintessence:
Quintessence: Q
Squintessence: σ
Quintessino:
(X. Bi, M. Li
and Zhang)
q
Similar to : Axion, Saxion, Axino
Majoron, Smajoron, Majorino (R. Mohapatra and Zhang)
•If is lighter than  ,
could serve as Dark matter
•Susying the following interaction
(H: SU(2) doublet)
gives
gives
* Prediction: long-lived charged particle:
Summary
• Dark Energy Interaction with
I.
for Baryo(Lepto)genesis
II. neutrino: mass varying
Implication in Leptogenesis (Bi, Gu, Wang and Zhang)
Cosmological limits needs check
III. SUSY: Quintessino as Dark matter
• The Dynamics of the Dark sector might be very rich!
( remember that for the 4% sector, the dynamics is already very rich)
Thanks !