Transcript Document

Precise measurement of reactor antineutrino
oscillations at Daya Bay
Vít Vorobel (on behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration)
Charles University in Prague
HEP2007 Conference, Manchester, Jul. 19, 2007
1
The Daya Bay Collaboration
Europe (3) (9)
JINR, Dubna, Russia
Kurchatov Institute, Russia
Charles University, Czech Republic
North America (14)(54)
BNL, Caltech, George Mason Univ., LBNL,
Iowa state Univ. Illinois Inst. Tech., Princeton,
RPI, UC-Berkeley, UCLA, Univ. of Houston,
Univ. of Wisconsin, Virginia Tech.,
Univ. of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign
~ 150 collaborators
Asia (18) (88)
IHEP, Beijing Normal Univ., Chengdu Univ.
of Sci. and Tech., CGNPG, CIAE, Dongguan
Polytech. Univ., Nanjing Univ.,Nankai Univ.,
Shandong Univ., Shenzhen Univ.,
Tsinghua Univ., USTC,
Zhongshan Univ., Hong Kong Univ.,
Chinese Hong Kong Univ., National Taiwan
Univ., National Chiao Tung Univ.,
National United Univ.
2
13The Last Unknown Neutrino Mixing Angle
UMNSP Matrix
Maki, Nakagawa, Sakata, Pontecorvo
1
0

 0 cos 23

0 sin  23
U e1 U e 2

U  U 1 U  2

U 1 U 2
  cos13
 
sin  23  
0

i CP
cos 23 
e sin 13
0
atmospheric,
accelerator
23 = ~ 45°
U e 3   0.8
 
U  3  0.4

U 3  
 0.4
0 ei CP sin 13   cos12
 
1
0
 sin 12

0
cos13 
  0
reactor,
accelerator
13 = ?
U e 3  ?

0.6
0.7 
0.6 0.7 

0.5
sin 12
cos12
0
0 1
0
 
0 0 e i / 2
 
1 0
0
SNO, solar SK,
KamLAND
12 ~ 32°
0
0
e i / 2i
0
?
• What ise fraction
of 3?
23  45
• Ue3 is the gateway to CP violation in neutrino
sector: P(  e) - P(ˉ  ˉe) sin(212)sin(223)cos2(13)sin(213)sin
3





Measuring 13 Using Reactor Anti-neutrinos
Electron anti-neutrino disappearance probability
2
2





m
L

m
2
2
4
2
2
13
21 L
  cos 13  sin 212  sin 

Pdis  sin 213  sin 
 4 E 
 4 E 
Small oscillation due to 13
< 2 km
Large oscillation due to 12
> 50 km
Osc. prob. (integrated over E) vs distance
e disappearance at
short baseline(~2 km):
unambiguous
measurement of 13
Sin2213 = 0.1
m231 = 2.5 x 10-3 eV2
Sin2212 = 0.825
m221 = 8.2 x 10-5 eV2
4
Objective of Near Term 13 Measurement
Previous best experimental limit from Chooz:
sin2(213) <0.17 (m231=2.510-3 eV, 90% c.f.)
Build an experiment with sensitivity of  0.01 in sin2(213)
Increase statistics: Use powerful reactors & large target mass
Suppress background:
Go deeper underground
High performance veto detector to MEASURE the background
Reduce systematic uncertainties:
Reactor-related:
Utilize near and far detectors to minimize reactor-related errors
Detector-related:
• Use “Identical” pairs of detectors to do relative measurement
• Comprehensive program in calibration/monitoring of detectors
5
Daya Bay, China
Multiple reactor cores.
(at present 4 units with 11.6 GWth; in 2011, 6 units with 17.4 GWth )
Adjacent to mountains.
Up to 1000 mwe overburden at the far site.
6
http://dayawane.ihep.ac.cn/
4 x 20 tons target
mass at far site
Daya Bay: Powerful reactor close
to mountains
Far site
1615 m from Ling Ao
1985 m from Daya
Overburden: 350 m
Ling Ao Near site
~500 m from Ling Ao
Overburden: 112 m
Mid site
873 m from Ling Ao
1156 m from Daya
Overburden: 208 m
Ling Ao-ll NPP
(under construction)
22.9 GW in 2011
Construction
tunnel
Filling hall
entrance
Daya Bay
NPP, 22.9 GW
Ling Ao
NPP, 22.9 GW
Daya Bay Near site
363 m from Daya Bay
Overburden: 98 m
Total length: ~3100 m7
Detection of e
Inverse -decay in Gd-doped liquid scintillator:
 e  p  e  n
 + p  D + (2.2 MeV) (t~180μs) 0.3b
 + Gd  Gd* Gd + ’s(8 MeV) (t~30μs)
50,000b
Time, space and energy-tagged signal
 suppress background events.
E  Te+ + Tn + (mn - mp) + m e+  Te+ + 1.8 MeV
8
Antineutrino Detector
Cylindrical 3-Zone Structure separated by
acrylic vessels:
I. Target: 0.1% Gd-loaded liquid
scintillator,
diameter=height= 3.1 m, 20 ton
II. -catcher: liquid scintillator, 42.5
cm thick
III. Buffer shielding: mineral oil,
48.8 cm thick
With 192 PMT’s on circumference
and reflective reflectors on top and
bottom:

E
~
12.2%
14%
,  vertex  14cm
13cm
E (MeV)
9
Inverse-beta Signals
Antineutrino Interaction Rate
(events/day per 20 ton module)
Daya Bay near site
Ling Ao near site
Far site
Prompt Energy Signal
1 MeV
960
760
90
Ee+(“prompt”) [1,8] MeV
En-cap (“delayed”)  [6,10] MeV
tdelayed-tprompt  [0.3,200] s
Delayed Energy Signal
8 MeV
6 MeV
10 MeV
MC statistics corresponds to a data taking with a single module at far site in 3 years.
10
Muon “Veto” System
Resistive plate chamber (RPC)
Surround detectors with at least
2.5m of water, which shields the
external radioactivity and
cosmogenic background
Water shield is divided into two
optically separated regions (with
reflective divider, 8” PMTs
mounted at the zone boundaries),
which serves as two active and
independent muon tagger
Augmented with a top muon
tracker: RPCs
Outer water shield Inner water shield
Combined efficiency of tracker
> 99.5% with error measured to
better than 0.25%
11
Backgrounds
Background = “prompt”+”delayed” signals that fake inverse-beta events
Three main contributors, all can be measured:
Background type
Experimental Handle
Muon-induced fast neutrons (prompt recoil,
delayed capture) from water or rock
>99.5% parent “water” muons tagged
~1/3 parent “rock” muons tagged
9Li/8He
(T1/2= 178 msec, decay w/neutron
emission, delayed capture)
Tag parent “showing” muons
Accidental prompt and delay coincidences
Single rates accurately measured
Background/Signal:
Fast n / signal
9Li-8He
/ signal
Accidental/signal
DYB site
LA site
Far site
0.1%
0.3%
<0.2%
0.1%
0.2%
<0.2%
0.1%
0.2%
<0.1%
12
Systematic Budget
Detector-related
Baseline: currently achievable relative uncertainty without R&D
Goal:
expected relative uncertainty after R&D
Swapping:
can reduce relative uncertainty further
Reactor-related
13
Daya Bay Sensitivity
Assume backgrounds are measured
to<0.2%.
Use rate and spectral shape.
Input relative detector systematic error
of 0.2%.
Milestones
Fall 07 Begin civil construction
June 09 Start commissioning first two
detectors
June 10 Begin data taking with near-far
90% confidence level
3 year of data taking
14
Daya Bay: Status and Plan
•
•
•
•
Passed DOE scientific review
Passed US CD-1 review
Passed final nuclear safety review in China
Began to receive committed project funding for 3 years
from Chinese agencies
Start civil construction
Anticipate US CD-2/3a review
Start data taking with 2 detectors at Daya Bay near hall
Begin data taking with 8 detectors in final configuration
Oct 06
Apr 07
Apr 07
Apr 07
Oct 07
Oct 07
May 09
Apr 10
0.04
Sensitivity
C.L.)
sin2sin
21322
(90%
13
•
•
•
•
0.03
0.02
0.01
Goal: 0.01
0
1
2
3
4
Run Time
Time (Years)
Run
(Years)
155