Second-Best Pricing for the US Postal Service
Download
Report
Transcript Second-Best Pricing for the US Postal Service
Second-Best Pricing for the
US Postal Service
Roger Sherman and Anthony
George
Presented by Ian Fetters
•US Postal Service operates under economies of scale
•Marginal cost pricing deficits
•Postal Reorganization Act [1970]
•Organized Postal Service, formerly Post Office Department into corporation
•Goal: to break even – given budget constraint
•How should the USPS price?
Conditions
• Economies of scale, so MC pricing deficit
• Budget constraint limits deficit
• Some services have substitutive or
complementary relationships with private sector
services
Previous models
• Ramsey, Boiteux – framework for second-best
models
• Davis/Whinston, Baumol/Bradford, Lerner –
models assuming no public/private sector
interactions
• Mohring – considers cross-price elasticities in
public sector, but not private sector
• Bergson – considers cross-price elasticities, but
no budget constraint
Assumptions
• No intermediate goods
• No interdependencies between goods
• Private firms do not respond to public
sector prices
Derivation of price
Utility function
Subject to income constraint
Demand function
Derivation of price
Seek to maximize welfare
Constraints: incomes and costs equal,
Firm only earns B
Derivation of price
Substitute for optimal price
Solve for derivation from MC in terms of elasticity
Implications
• If E = 0, then optimal pricing a la
kj
Baumol/Bradford
• If Ekj =/= 0 among public sector services, then
situation similar to Mohring
• If Ekj =/= 0 between public/private sector
services, then situation similar to Bergson
Implications
• As budget constraint is more important,
α 1, price further from MC,
substitute/complementary services more
important
• If private service tends to be complement
to public, public service will be cheaper
than if ignoring complemancy
Implications
• USPS estimates MCs very low
– α approaches 1, influence of private sector
less important
• Others estimate MC of USPS higher
– α approaches 0, must consider private sector
when pricing in public sector
• Estimates of MC increase over time