EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, SESSION 6: MALE MATE PREFERENCES.
Download
Report
Transcript EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, SESSION 6: MALE MATE PREFERENCES.
Evolutionary Psychology Lecture 8:
Jealousy and Mate Retention.
Thoughts for the day.
“No woman no cry”. Bob Marley.
“He that is not jealous is not in love” St Augustine.
“Hey Joe. Where you goin’ with that gun in your
hand? Goin’ down to shoot my old lady. You know
I caught her messin’ around with another man”.
(“Hey Joe” Billy Roberts, 1966).
“When you’re in love with a beautiful woman,
watch your friends” (Dr Hook).
Learning Outcomes.
At the end of this session you should be able to:
1. Discuss the evidence for the adaptive
significance of romantic jealousy.
2. Evaluate theoretical predictions concerning sex
differences in jealousy.
Jealousy.
Romantic jealousy has been defined as:
"a fear and rage reaction fitted to protect,
maintain, and prolong the intimate association of
love" (Davis 1948).
Jealousy is generated:
"when there is a threat to, or an actual loss of a
valued relationship due to an actual or imagined
rival for one's partners attention” (DeSteno &
Salovey, 1996).
Evolutionary Explanations For Jealousy.
Mate retention is very important for both sexes, so males and
females should show jealousy to the same degree.
However, evolutionary psychologists predict that the sexes
may differ in terms of the events that activate jealousy, due
to the following:
1. Paternity Uncertainty: Males can never be certain that an
offspring is theirs. E.g. 9-13% of human children are being
unknowingly raised by their non-genetic father (Baker,
1996).
2. Mate Value: Young females are more reproductively
valuable, and a few males can monopolise them, so there will
always be males seeking to steal mates of other males.
Females may also seek extra-pair copulations if they find a
superior mate (Buss, 1999).
Costs of Cuckoldry.
Investing resources in another males offspring leads to
high costs for an unwitting cuckold:
1. He has lost the considerable efforts he has put into
courting the female - time, energy, risk, resources.
2. The time spent courting the unfaithful female could have
been better spent finding another.
3. He may unknowingly continue to pour resources into a
child who does not carry his genetic material.
We might therefore expect males to be particularly
sensitive about their partners possible sexual infidelity.
Psychological Adaptations.
Wilson & Daly (1992) argued that sexual proprietary
behaviours such as:
Mate guarding.
Male aggression.
Spousal Violence.
and certain attitudes such as:
Valuing female chastity.
Culture-wide concept of adultery as a property violation.
are evolved male solutions to the adaptive problem of
paternity uncertainty.
The Female Dilemma.
Females have faced a slightly different set of adaptive
problems.
If their partner commits a sexual infidelity, it has no effect
on her parenthood certainty.
However, she and her offspring stand to lose a considerable
loss of protection, status, and resources if the male devotes
his time to another female and her offspring.
We might therefore expect females to be particularly
sensitive to behaviours signalling their partners potential
emotional (and of course sexual) infidelity.
The emotion of jealousy is therefore adaptive for both
sexes.
But Males Stand To Lose More!
As males stand more to lose than females through sexual
infidelity, we would expect the following to be particularly
common in males:
1. Increased sensitivity to circumstances in which their
partner may have the chance to be unfaithful.
2. The increased likelihood of mate guarding behaviours to
reduce possible contact between their partner and other
males.
3. Greater willingness to perform actions to keep their
partner.
4. Increase of threatening and hostile behaviour to other
males.
Is there any evidence for this?
1. Mate Guarding.
Extreme mate guarding (harems, concubines, multiple
wives) arises when the chance for resource acquisition and
hoarding exist.
Even males with access to a single female will engage in a
variety of guarding behaviours:
Chaperoning.
Veiling.
Purdah (keeping males and females separate).
Chastity belts.
Genital mutilation.
Limiting education and equality.
Such cultural actions only occur with women of
reproductive age. They are often conducted by female
relatives to increase a girl’s mate value
Real-Life Example.
In an anthropological study of relationships in a Caribbean
village, Flinn (1988) found that:
Males whose mates were of reproductive age were more
often in their company than males whose mates were at
post-reproductive age, or were pregnant.
A woman’s fecundity was proportionally associated with
more antagonism in her mate’s interactions with her.
There was greater antagonism amongst mated couples who
were not strictly monogamous.
Males who were vying for the attentions of a particular
women were more antagonistic than during other malemale interactions.
2. Mate Retention.
Divorce is very common across all human societies and
cultures, e.g. between 50-67% of couples will divorce in
America (sexual infidelity being cited as a key cause).
This indicates that mate retention is a significant and
difficult adaptive problem.
Buss (1988) tried to isolate the kinds of behaviours that
individuals employ to retain a mate.
Sex differences emerged as males were more likely to
monopolise her time, display or provide resources and
threaten other males.
Women were more likely to use appearance enhancement,
and the inducement of jealousy as tactics of mate
retention.
Mate Poaching.
Schmitt & Buss (2001) found that around 50% reported
attempting mate poaching, while around 85% had been the
target of poaching attempts.
Nearly a quarter of males and females admitted that their
current relationship was the result of a successful poaching
attempt.
What makes a good mate poacher?
Schmitt & Buss (2001) found that successful female
poachers are assumed to use enhancement of their
appearance, and suggestions of sexual access.
Successful male poachers are assumed to be socially
dominant and have access to plentiful resources.
Successful poachers of both sexes are assumed to
denigrate the same sex partner by questioning their
commitment and attractiveness.
Retention Behaviour in Context.
Buss & Shackelford (1997) argued that the psychological
adaptations underlying mate retention behaviours may be
sensitive to 3 contexts:
1. Mate value: Reproductive or parental potential is a key
factor. Age and attractiveness (for males), resource
acquisition or potential (for females).
2. Perceived mate value discrepancies: In some pair bonds
there will be differences in the couples respective mate
values.
3. Perceived probability of infidelity: An important cue
signalling a failure of mate retention is that of the suspicion
of infidelity.
Predictions.
Buss & Shackelford (1997) assessed mate retention
behaviours. They predicted that individuals fulfilling the
following criteria would devote more time to mate
retention:
Men married to younger and more attractive women.
Women married to men with many resources, or excellent
prospects.
Individuals who suspected that their partner may be
unfaithful.
They also predicted that:
Males would attempt to retain their mates by providing
resources.
Females would attempt to retain their mates by enhancing
their physical appearance.
Results.
1. Men married to younger women and to women they
perceived as being more very attractive devoted great
efforts to mate retention.
2. Women married to males with plentiful resources also
showed more mate retention behaviours.
3. Men (but not women) whose partners they suspected
may become unfaithful significantly increased certain
retention behaviours.
4. Men were more likely to use resource-based tactics (and
aggression) to retain a mate, while women were much
more likely to use physical enhancement.
3. Adultery and Culture.
All human societies have some form of ritualised ‘marriage’
arrangement, and all have strict laws dealing with adultery.
In most societies, adultery is defined only as a married
woman having an affair with another man.
Adultery is often explicitly treated as a property violation,
with the victim being entitled to violent or economic
revenge (return of the dowry).
In many countries, and in several states of the USA (up to
the 1970’s), murder on the discovery of a wife’s infidelity is
not considered a crime.
Until recently, husbands were legally entitled to confine
their wives against their will and use force to obtain their
conjugal rights.
Psychological Studies of Jealousy.
Buss et al., (1992) predicted that males and females would
be differentially concerned about potential sexual and
emotional infidelity.
Males >distress to sexual infidelity.
Females >distress to emotional infidelity.
Participants presented with 2 dilemmas, each concerning
hypothetical sexual or emotional infidelity of their partner.
60% of males reported greater distress to sexual infidelity
compared to 17% of females. 83% of females showed
greater distress to emotional infidelity.
The findings were confirmed using electrophysiology.
Males with experience of a sexual relationship showed
more distress to sexual infidelity than those lacking such
experiences.
Cross-Cultural Studies.
Buunk et al., (1996) presented the jealousy-invoking
scenarios to participants from the USA, Germany and the
Netherlands.
In each sample (containing more than 200 participants)
males were much more likely to choose the sexual infidelity
scenario as the most upsetting.
The largest effect was for the American group - the
Germans and Dutch have long histories of sexual freedom
and equality.
Culture can influence the strength of the adaptive response
but the response is still significant.
Buunk et al., (1996) Results.
From Buunk et al., 1996, p361
Comparison of the Techniques.
Pietrzak et al., (2002) compared the various techniques.
Participants selected a scenario which would distress them
more and provided continuous ratings while physiological
variables were being monitored.
73% of males reported greater distress to the sexual
infidelity scenario.
96% of females opted for the emotional distress scenario.
Males reported stronger feelings of anger, rage and
betrayal whilst imagining sexual infidelity.
Females reported stronger feelings of anger, anxiety and
fear while imagining emotional infidelity.
Males showed greater physiological responses to the sexual
infidelity scenario while females showed greater
physiological responses to emotional infidelity
Experience of Infidelity.
Sagarin et al., (2003) also used both forced-choice and
continuous rating scales and found the predicted sex
differences using both measures.
In addition they assessed prior experience of infidelity,
hypothesising that such experiences would make the
individual particularly sensitive to the possibility of future
infidelity.
As predicted the experience of being the victim of a
previous infidelity led to males reporting greater distress in
response to sexual infidelity, but this did not occur for
women.
However, women that had perpetrated an infidelity showed
greater distress while men who had perpetrated an
infidelity did not.
Responses to Infidelity.
Shackelford et al., (2002) focused upon sex differences in
response to a partner's infidelity.
They reasoned that a single instance of female infidelity
would have a large impact on male paternity certainty.
A single instance of male infidelity would have no impact on
female reproductive success. However, continued male
infidelity resulting in a shift in his emotional commitment
could have long-term consequences for the female in
question.
They thus predicted:
Men would find it more difficult to forgive and be more
likely to break up with a partner who committed a sexual
infidelity.
Women would be less likely to forgive and more likely to
break up with a male who committed emotional infidelity.
Shackelford et al (2002) Findings.
In their study 256 students were presented with several
forced-choice dilemmas covering their responses to a
sexual and emotional infidelity.
Which would they find more difficult to forgive?
Which would they consider more likely to lead to a breakup of the relationship?
As predicted, the majority of males (65%) found it more
difficult to forgive a sexual infidelity and felt that such an
infidelity (55%) would be more likely to break up the
relationship.
The comparable figures for females were 52% and 42% of
women respectively.
Characteristics of a Rival.
The status of a jealousy-inducing rival is of course
important.
Dijkstra & Buunk (2001) presented men and women with
scenarios of rivals flirting with their partners at a party.
After reading the scenario participants turned the page and
saw a photograph of the rival (attractive or unattractive)
and a personality description (dominant or passive).
The physical attractiveness of a rival did not affect men's
feelings of jealousy but their dominance status did.
The reverse was true for females as physical attraction
made a big impact but status did not.
The sexes are thus primarily threatened by rivals who
embody what their partners may seek.