Transcript Slide 1

Community
Engagement at WCU
Carnegie Foundation Classification
Monday, June 23, 2008
AGENDA
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND
WCU – CAROL
OVERVIEW OF THE CARNEGIE
FRAMEWORK – CAROL
UNC TOMORROW/CARNEGIE –
MELISSA
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT &
SERVICE LEARNING – GLENN
UNPACKING THE FRAMEWORK IN
GROUPS - GARY
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
DEFINED
The collaboration between higher
education institutions and their larger
communities (local, regional/state,
national, global) for the mutually
beneficial exchange of knowledge and
resources in a context of partnership
and reciprocity.
Community Engagement







Equal partnership
Collaboration
Mutual benefits
Shared problem
identification
Shared problem
resolution
Knowledge exchange
Shared resources
Community Engaged Teaching,
Research, and Service
Engaged Service
Community
Engaged
Engaged Teaching
Engaged Research
Source: Community Campus Partnerships for Health
New Academy

Scholarship/Research → DISCOVERY

Teaching → LEARNING

Service → ENGAGEMENT
Community Engagement cont’d





How does community
engagement differ
from civic engagement?
Engaged scholarship?
Volunteering?
Community service?
Experiential education?
WHY CARNEGIE?
Receiving the Carnegie Classification as a
Community Engaged University is an
external recognition of what we value
internally.
WHY CARNEGIE?








Organizational development opportunity
Promotes “practice what we preach”
Helps us to define our community
Increases visibility for WCU
Connects to the QEP
Responds to UNC Tomorrow
Helps us identify our gaps/opportunities for
growth
Institutional accountability
Community Engagement
Framework
1.
Foundational Indicators
1.
2.
Institutional identity and culture (mission, pubs.,
web, recognitions, celebrations, community events)
Institutional commitment (Chancellor’s speeches,
budget allocations, strategic plan, faculty development,
assessment, infrastructure, community representatives’
roles)
Carnegie Engagement Framework
2.
Categories of Community Engagement


Curricular Engagement (e.g., service learning, internships,
community based capstones, faculty scholarship)
Outreach and Partnerships (professional development centers,
collaborative libraries and museums, extension courses,
partnerships)
Desired Strengths





Alignment of institutional identity, language,
culture, and commitments
Common definitions
Attention to record-keeping and reporting
Evidence of a culture of engagement
Rewards and recognitions support engagement
Common Limitations




Lack of community representatives on
university infrastructure
Lack of support for recruiting/hiring and
promotion/tenure rewards
Unfocused, haphazard, sporadic assessment and
at few levels
No or few institutional benchmarks and goals
related to engagement
Last Awards (2006)







44 public institutions
32 private institutions
36 doctoral
21 masters colleges
13 baccalaureate colleges
5 community colleges
1 specialized institution







5 curricular engagement
9 outreach partnerships
62 applied for combined
classification
Total of 72 Awards
NC State
UNC Chapel Hill
Elon University
Timeline





Post drafts on Web beginning in late July
On-Line Application
Due September 1
Review during September to December
Campuses notified in December, 2008