Transcript Document
MODERNIZATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION (EUROPEAN CONTEXT) Senia Terzieva 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY An European Union agenda for the modernisation of higher education • Europe needs more graduates • Quality, relevance and employability • Higher education’s contribution to economic recovery and long term growth Lene Oftedal, Policy Officer, Higher Education and Erasmus, DG EAC Bologna and Higher Education Reform Experts, Lisbon 06.10.2011 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Higher education institutions in time of change To achievement the general objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy, a central role assigned higher education institutions. The European Commission , in subsequent communications released in 2011, 2012 and 2013, stressed the importance of education – and higher education in particular – as a key enabler of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. How innovations can support higher education in times of change? 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Higher education institutions in time of change What are the main challenges facing higher education and driving innovation in this sector? What are the key differences in terms of regional and institutional contexts for achieving successful innovation in higher education for different constituencies? How does innovation in higher education involve key system components and how does it influence – directly and indirectly – the system functions? What are the key processes and the roles of the key stakeholders in implementing innovation? What are the major outcomes of innovation in higher education and what main bottlenecks and blockages exist in achieving them? Brennan, John, Broek, Simon, Durazzi, Niccolo, Kamphuis, Bregtje, Ranga, Marina and Ryan, Steve (2014) Study on innovation in higher education: final report. E C Directorate for Education and Training Study on Innovation in Higher Education, 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Functions of higher education systems Teaching and learning · Curriculum development; · Student assessment - Mobility; · Accreditation; -New knowledge creation ; · Testing and measurements; · Experimentation; · Validation of results; · Protection of Intellectual property; Creation of spin-offs · Contracts with industry; · Contracts with public bodies; · Participation in policymaking; · Involvement social environment; · Public understanding of science 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Policy for changing in university management Teaching and learning process − Awareness of the reason from the implementation of the − − − − innovation, stimulates openness to innovation and changes Involve faculty members in implementation of new learning technologies Stimulate cross-institutional collaboration to improve quality and student posibilities to choice individual educational plan (and possibly to decrease costs) Put in place adequate measures for skills development of teaching staff Regularly review of the existing organisational linkages with partners and stakeholders based on: Brennan J., & all, Study on innovation in higher education: final report (2014): final report, European Commission 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Overcoming the boundaries and more synergies between Business manufacturing and services, primary sectors, financial sector, creative industries, social sector, large firms, SMEs, young entrepreneurs, students with business ideas, cluster and business organisations. Research research bodies, universities, science and technology parks, NCPs, Technology transfer offices, Horizon2020 committee members, regional ESFRI roadmaps etc. Public administration Different departments, if relevant at different government levels, agencies e.g. for regional development, business advice, public procurement offices, incubators, etc. Civil society NGOs and citizens’ initiatives related to societal challenges for which innovative solutions would be helpful, consumers associations, talents, etc. 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Policy for changing in university management − Identify the students characteristics and needs analys of learners expectations of education; − Ensure learner access to relevant technologies and possession of necessary skills to gain maximum benefits from them; − Provide appropriate processes, tools and support activities so that Faculty are able to fully utilise the rich data generated through analytics to enable them to respond to individual student needs and to further develop their teaching; − Clarify the roles of the different actors (within and beyond the institution) involved in meeting these needs; − Build supportive relationships and trust between the relevant actors (students, academic staff, support staff, IT staff, managers and, where applicable, employers). 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Policy for changing in university management Policy to face globalisation and internationalisation Higher education institutions should consider the need to: − Balance commercial, educational and reputational considerations in formulating overall international strategy − Consideration the interconnected factors such as student mobility and placements, qualification recognition, funding implications, curriculum and pedagogic implications, and labour market linkages − Consider the needs of different actors including home and international students, academic and support staff, quality assurance agencies, employers − Establish how much to ‘export’ from the home institution − Establish how much to ‘import’ from the international activities to reshape the home institution − Satisfy different national regulatory and quality assurance regimes 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Policy for changing in university management − Clarify the funding implications, intended outcomes and timescales for the innovation − Collect and analyse feedback information (from learners, institutions, employers etc) on performance and impact, and inform all relevant actors − Identify any unintended consequences of the innovation (e.g. for other functions, for widening participation or labour market linkages) − Establish a clear regulatory including: quality assurance mechanisms, credit recognition processes and intellectual property right regulations 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Policy for changing in university management Research results are integrated into entrepreneurship education and training Integrating research results into entrepreneurship education and training can show the breadth of entrepreneurship – for example, by discussing entrepreneurship in different contexts such as: • Business models; • Forms of ownership; • Social and societal entrepreneurship; • Entrepreneurship in transition economies; • Corporate entrepreneurship; Etc. 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Innovative university ? Enterprenuerial education "Entrepreneurial higher education institutions are designed to empower staff and students to demonstrate enterprise, innovation and creativity in research, teaching and pursuit and use of knowledge across boundaries. They contribute effectively to the enhancement of learning in a societal environment characterised by high levels of uncertainty and complexity and they are dedicated to creating public value via a process of open engagement, mutual learning, discovery and exchange with all stakeholders in society - local, national and international.“ Gibb, A.A. (2013, submitted), "Developing the Entrepreneurial University of the Future. Key Challenges, Opportunities and Responses", OECD, Paris. 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Innovative university Enterprenuership develeopment in teaching and learning Collaborating and engaging with external stakeholders is a key component of teaching and learning development in an entrepreneurial higher education institution. The higher education institution validates entrepreneurship learning outcomes. Entrepreneurial behaviour is supported throughout the higher education experience; from creating awareness and stimulating ideas through to development and implementation. Staff take an entrepreneurial approach to teaching in all departments, promoting diversity and innovation in teaching and learning. The higher education institution is structured in such a way that it stimulates and supports the development of entrepreneurial mindsets and skills. 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Innovative university Engagement stakeholders in process for development teaching and learning in an Entrepreneurial Higher Education Institution Guest lecturers, life case studies, interviews, are appropriate formats. Some co-delivered courses (team-teaching ) by academics and practitioners. Programes oriented in the devepoment of learning experience in entrepreneurial practice. (The practitioners benefit: academic reflection about their practices, networking with students as potential future recruits and gaining insights into up-to-date research methodologies and results.) Now in Bulgaria we have a regulations obstacles. In addition, such practitioners can be involved in developing or reviewing the strategy of the higher education institution on entrepreneurship co-operation as well as in reviewing programme content and models of teaching. 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Innovative university Support the entrepreneurial behaviour. Creating awareness and stimulating ideas through to development and implementation of new ventures. The objective of entrepreneurship education is the systematic and effective development of enterprising individuals, who are responsible towards society and the communities they live in. For the practical implementation of entrepreneurship education, however, this must be narrowed down into broad learning objectives and practical aims, such as: • Creative thinking; • Self-initiative and responsibility; • Tolerance for and overcoming failure; and, • Commercial literacy for business creation and growth. 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Innovative university Provide the learning environment , which stimulate and support the development of entrepreneurial skills The establishment of academic positions will help to promote entrepreneurship development in teaching and learning. An example is a chair or professorship in entrepreneurship. Such formalised entrepreneurship champions can support further work on developing an entrepreneurial spiritthrough the following activities: • Initiating student projects to develop ideas on how to make the higher education institution more entrepreneurial; • Taking over responsibility for developing workshops on entrepreneurial activities and academic spin-offs for students and/or faculty; • Developing closer collaboration with different types of successful entrepreneurs, including alumni that could serve as role models and source of inspiration. 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Key policy messages • • Increase attainment levels (in line with Europe 2020 agreed national targets), including among underrepresented Progression routes and recognition of prior learning and experience Outreach to underrepresented groups, guidance and targeted financial support Reduce drop-out Improve quality and relevance - Graduate employability - Tailoring learning modes to a diverse student body - Motivating and rewarding excellent teachers - Programmes informed by and adapted to labour market needs. underrepresented Lene Oftedal, Policy Officer, Higher Education and Erasmus, DG EAC Bologna and Higher Education Reform Experts, Lisbon 06.10.2011 1 – 8 March 2015 SEMEY Q&A Thank You for Your Attention