Class 2 - University of Southern California
Download
Report
Transcript Class 2 - University of Southern California
Module IV: Financial Strategy:
Dividend Strategy
Week 11 – April 4, 2006
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Objectives
Learn
about the institutional details of
– paying dividends and
– the types of dividends that exist
Understand
the theory of dividend policy
Examine the factors that actually determine
dividend policy
Avon case is requires exploring the above
issues
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
2
Introduction
The
dividend decision is one of the most
important decisions facing a corporation
How much of earnings given back to
shareholders?
– This is the same decision as how much of
earnings should be retained
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
3
Financial Decisions
Assets
are traded in the goods and services
markets
– The investment decision is main role of financial
management because goods markets can be inefficient
Liabilities
are issued and traded in the securities
markets
– The financing decision is second requirement of
financial management but managers face generally
efficient markets for securities
Distribution
of cash is the final decision
management must make
– The dividend decision returns resources to owners
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Types of dividends
Cash
dividends (either regular or extra) are
cash distributions from earnings and are the
most common
Liquidating dividend pay out all cash from
sale of assets to end operations of the firm
Stock dividends (issuing new stock as a
dividend) are like stock splits and are not
really what we mean by dividends since no
cash is paid
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
5
Other Distributions
Share
repurchases (through the open market
or a general tender offer) are another way of
distributing cash to shareholders
Some cash payments to shareholders are
made through direct negotiation, e.g.,
greenmail
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
6
Institutional Details
Dividends
are set by the board of directors
and are paid to all recorded shareholders.
There are typically legal restrictions on
dividends in order to protect bondholders
from agency costs.
– Otherwise, firms near bankruptcy could pay
“liquidating” dividends from capital, essentially
transferring wealth from bondholders to
stockholders.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
7
Procedures for Cash Dividends
Four
key Dates:
– Declaration Date: Board passes a resolution
to pay dividends to all shareholders of record
on a certain (payment) date.
– Date of Record: Declared dividends are
distributable to shareholders of record on this
day
» Dividends are not paid to those the corporation does
not believe are shareholders
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
8
Procedures: Continued
– Ex Dividend Date: Shares become ex dividend
on the date the seller is entitled to keep the
dividend
» Under NYSE rules. shares are traded ex dividend
on and after the fourth business day before the
record date
» Before the ex dividend date, shares trade cum
dividend (with the dividend)
– Payment Date: Dividends are mailed to
shareholders of record.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
9
Empirical Facts
In
recent years, U.S. corporations have paid
over half their after-tax profits as dividends.
Most corporations set a target dividend
payout ratio.
Corporations smooth their dividend
payments to shareholders
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
10
Empirical Facts
Managers
focus more on changes in
dividends than on the level of dividends.
Managers are unwilling to lower dividends.
– Changes in dividends are viewed as reflecting
changes in long-term profitability.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
11
Dividends and Valuation
In
the Gordon dividend growth model, stock
price is the present value of all future
dividends, so it appears that an increase in
dividends will raise firm value:
DIV1
P0
rS g Div
Critical
here is that rS is required return on
equity and gDiv will be determined by the
effects of dilution from new equity issues
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
12
Summary M-M Debate Issues
M-M
ISSUES
CAPITAL
(1) TAXES
STRUCTURE
IRRELEVANT (2) BANKRUPTCY
STATE
OF DEBATE
TRADEOFFS
(3) AGENCY
DIVIDENDS
IRRELEVANT
(4) EQUILIBRIUM
(1) INFORMATION
(2) TAXES
(3) MILLERSCHOLES
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
EVIDENCE
Dividend Policy: Theory
Dividend
policy should be chosen because
of the effect of changes in dividends on
share value
Most people believe that dividends are
shareholders’ reward for investing in the
firm.
– It seems logical that higher dividends are
associated with higher firm value
– This intuition can be misleading
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
14
Investment and Dividends
Firms
should invest in all NPV>0 projects
using the WACC which includes rS
Investment determines a firm’s value:
Inve stme nt Income Divide nds Equity
Value
of firm (with or without debt)
depends on the value from investments
Cash dividends may not use up excess cash
or may increase need for new equity
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Miller-Modigliani Theory
Dividend
policy is thus the trade-off
between share repurchases or new issues
and dividend payment.
Miller-Modigliani Dividend Irrelevance
Proposition (1961):
With perfect capital markets and no
taxes, the dividend policy of a firm does
not affect its value.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
16
M-M Dividend Irrelevance
Assumes
no taxation and efficient markets
Stockholders can create cash flows
equivalent to dividends by selling shares
Shareholders not needing cash can reinvest
dividends in stock
Reinvested earnings (not paid as dividends)
grow at firm’s rate of return and produce
gains
New equity dilutes old claims on income
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Issues in the Dividend Debate
Taxation
of dividends versus capital gains
Different tax treatments: individuals, mutual
funds, pension funds (clienteles)
Information in dividends
– Cash payment signals real cash flows
– Smoothing implies information on future cash
Tax
effects may be offset
– Miller-Scholes strategies can eliminate problem
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Tax Rates on Corporate Income
Bush
tax reduction on dividends
Equality in taxation?
Before
Dividends Gains Interest
Corporate Tax Rate
35%
35%
0%
Personal Tax Rate
35%
15%
35%
Total Tax
70%
50%
35%
How
After
Dividends
and Gains Interest
35%
0%
15%
35%
50%
35%
to achieve neutrality (0% corporate tax rate)
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Stock Prices and Dividends
In
theory, the stock price falls by the
amount of the dividend on the ex date:
– For example, consider a stock selling for $30
that will “pay” a $2 dividend tomorrow. If the
price tomorrow is not $28, there is an arbitrage
possibility. Say the price will stay at $30. I
buy the stock now, get the $2 dividend, and
then sell tomorrow, making an arbitrage profit
of $2. So, the price tomorrow must be $28.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
20
Ex Dividend Date Price Behavior
Ex Dividend Date
Stock
Price
Declaration Date
In a friction-free
world, $2 is the ex
dividend price drop
Payment Date
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
21
Dividends and Prices: Reality
Stock
prices do fall on the ex dividend date,
but typically by less than the full amount of
the dividend. Possible explanations:
– Personal taxes may cause a drop by 90-95% of
the dividend.
– The payment of the dividend may result in
positive stock price movements
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
22
Dividend Policy in Practice
As
in the case of capital structure, the M-M
proposition is important because it focuses
attention on what is meant by dividend
policy, and what factors affect the choice of
dividends.
In reality, M-M theory cannot explain some
important puzzles regarding dividend
policy.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
23
Dividend Puzzle I
Capital
Markets
Firm
Shareholders
Firms often borrow money to pay dividends
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
24
Dividend Puzzle II
Firm A:
No Dividends
Capital gains
are taxed when
stock is sold
Firm B:
Dividends
Earnings paid
as dividends
are taxed now
Paying dividends Increases Shareholder Taxes
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
25
Real-World Dividend Policy
In
the real-world, dividend policy seems to
matter considerably.
Three views on dividend policy all have
adherents
– Dividends are value enhancing
– Dividends are value decreasing
– Small changes in dividend policy have little
effect
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
26
Dividends Create Value
Dividends
may increase firm value. Why?
– Dividends are signals of profitability (“Cash is
king”) since the firm’s true value may be
unobservable.
– Dividends absorb excess cash flow, reducing
agency costs and managerial waste.
– Dividends attract institutions, broadening the
shareholder base, increasing liquidity and
lowering the cost of capital
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
27
Recent Events and Dividends
Controversy
concerning reported earnings
with firms providing pro forma earnings
based on “normal” operations
Earnings manipulations using legal and
illegal accounting methods
Charles Schwab calling for elimination of
tax disadvantage of dividends to encourage
firms to pay cash to investors
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Evidence for Dividends’ Value
Researchers
have found a positive
relationship between price-earnings ratios
and dividend-earnings ratios.
– This, however, does not mean that dividends
cause higher stock prices.
But
stock prices do not fall by the full
amount of the dividend payment
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
29
Clientele Effects
High Net Worth
Individuals
Firm A:
No Dividends
Tax Exempt
Institutions and
Corporations
Firm B:
Low Tax Bracket
Individuals
Dividends
Firms attract clienteles based on their dividend policy
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
30
Summary of Dividend Policy
Dividend
policy is a crucial strategic
decision for the firm
Many aspects of dividend policy are
puzzling.
The available evidence suggests that for
most firms, small changes in dividend
policy have little effect.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
31
Module V:
International Capital Markets
Week 12 -- April 6, 2006
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Objectives
Understand
basics of global capital markets
and recent developments for corporate
financing decisions
Understand how foreign firms raise capital
in the United States and elsewhere
Examine factors relevant to firms’ cost of
financing in using international sources of
financing
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
International Cases: Context
The
Hostile Bid for Red October
– Russian equity market risks
» Inflation
» Liquidity problems
» Reporting and transparency issues
» Political risk: taxation, regulation, favoritism
Genset
Initial Public Offering
– France in 1996
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Example Stock Markets 2001
Number of
Firms
Market
Capitalization Percent of Global
(Billions)
Total
Country
U.S.A.
Japan
United Kingdom
France
Germany
South Korea
7,534
2,561
1,904
808
1022
1308
$15,104
3,157
2,577
1,447
1,270
172
47.42%
9.91%
8.09%
4.54%
3.99%
0.54%
Non-OECD
China
Taiwan
1086
531
581
248
1.82%
0.78%
World Total
35,044
35,346
Source: S&P Stock Market Factbook 2001
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
100.00%
Issues in Global Markets
Integration
of capital markets
– How much or how little do events in one
market reflect events in other markets
– Expected real returns across markets
Benefits
of diversification
– Risk reduction through correlations of returns
– How to choose portfolio allocations
Risks
of international investing
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Recent Findings
Importance
of global effects has increased
in the “new economy” of the 1990’s
Emerging country specific risk has
increased dramatically since the crises of
the 1990’s while developed-country specific
risk has declined
Industry factors, especially technology,
probably explain higher correlations
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Global Financial Management
Investment
in assets
– Find highest NPV or highest return projects on
a risk-adjusted basis
– Cash flows measured in purchasing power of
owners (maximize shareholders’ wealth!)
Financing
– Minimize cost of funds on a risk-adjusted basis
International
finance: analysis of currency
and political risks that are unique to foreign
operations
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Currency and Political Risk
Currency
risk is variability in cash returns
due to variations in exchange rates
– For important currencies can be hedged in
financial markets
– Often can be hedged on the balance sheet by
operating and financing policies (recall
American Airlines and Canada and G.E. turbine
sales examples
Some
currencies cannot be hedged: what
kind of risk is currency risk (systematic,
liquidity, etc.)?
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
International Capital Flows
Where
are highest real returns to be
found in the world today?
– Emerging market economies (educated,
hard-working labor, low capital stocks)
– The United States? (capital inflow, new
economy, benign business environment)
– Europe? (opening to East, Euro,
restructuring)
– Latin America?
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Determinants of Capital Flows
Take
advantage of higher returns
– Japanese investments in Asian neighbors
– OPEC investments in diversified economies
Benefits
from diversification
– Pension funds and other institutional flows
Arbitrage
risk-return differentials
– Temporary differentials that are expected to go
away, as from political threats that can be
managed by diversification
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Issues in International Investing
Taxes
and/or restrictions of payment of
dividends or proceeds of sale
Currency related issues
– Ability to hedge and/or convert cash flows
– Costs of currency hedging and/or conversion
– Currency risk due to economic fundamentals
(devaluation/revaluation)
Liquidity
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
and transaction costs
Equity Trading Costs
(One-Way Mean, in Basis Points)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Implicit
0
OECD
Latin
America
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Explicit
East
Europe
Asia
Emerging Market Equity Issues
Private
equity versus public issues
– Role played by private investors (like venture
capital)
– Importance of marketability for some investors
Second
board markets
– Examples: MOTHERS in Japan, U.S.
NASDAQ Small Cap markets
– Hong Kong GEMs, Korean Kosdaq, Sesdaq
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Markets and Venture Capital
Emerging
market economies in Asia have
been active in developing venture capital
industries
– Most successful (like U.S.) is Taiwan
– Others differ from U.S. experience, partially for
cultural reasons
– Organizational forms and exit possibilities
Second
board markets in Asia have not
represented a reliable exit strategy
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Trends in Equity Trading
Global
integration in equity trading
– Natural economies of scale in markets: size
promotes liquidity
– Technology
– History and legal system
Three
models of future markets
– Concentration, as in NYSE in U.S.
– Alliances (e.g. Singapore and Australia)
– Electronic markets (ECNs)
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Advantages of U.S. Listing
Liquidity
provided by large markets
Established market with global reputation
and known and enforced rules of conduct
Prestige of listing
Attractiveness to investors
– Domestic U.S. retail investors
» Reporting and currency issues
– Institutional investors
» Liquidity and liability concerns
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
American Depository Receipts
American
depository receipts (ADRs) are
used for foreign companies to trade on U.S.
markets
– Shares deposited in custodial bank in firms’
home countries
– ADRs have grown in popularity since 1980’s
» Institutional investors wishing international
diversification
» Foreign firms wishing to raise funds in U.S.
Several
levels of ADRs
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Levels of ADRs
Level
I
– Simplest but unlisted and traded over-the-counter (pink
sheets)
– Reporting requirements are minimal (Form F-6)
Level
II
– Required to list on exchanges (NYSE, AMEX,
NASDAQ)
– Disclosure but not meeting U.S. standards
Level
III
– Full compliance with U.S. reporting requirements
(using GAAP standards)
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
ADRs on NYSE 2000
Country/
Region
China
Japan
S. Korea
Taiwan
Asia
Europe
L. America
ADR
Issues
13
13
5
4
64
174
103
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Shares Volume Market Cap
($)
(mill)
($ mill)
166.5
5,631.0
2,480.3
242.8 22,588.0
10,594.5
351.0 15,469.9
6,649.5
229.1 14,299.0
2,858.8
2,346.1 920,617.6 45,331.2
9,763.3 514,235.1 399,607.2
3,563.4 141,416.9 79,795.9
Who Owns Foreign Corporations?
SOEs
partially privatized
– Shares traded in China
– Ownership by a variety of institutions
Stakes
–
–
–
–
in firms also owned by
Regional governments
Government ministries
TVEs
Pension funds and TICs
Goal
of management?
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Next Week – April 13, 2006
Review
topics covered in RWJ, Chapters 1,
14, 20
Read and think carefully about issues of
corporate governance in Circon (A) case for
discussion on April 20 and remember that
this is the last individual case write-up
Use week of April 24 to review for final
exam by reviewing course syllabus, weekly
objectives and slides, and case notes
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Next Week – April 13, 2006
Review
text material on international capital
markets (e.g. RWJ, Chapter 31)
Prepare Genset Initial Public Offering
group write-up before class for discussion
on April 13, 2006
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006