Transcript Slide 1
SEXUAL HARASSMENT: CHALLENGES IN THE EVOLVING WORKPLACE
Presented by: Annmarie Simeone Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.
Somerville, NJ 08876-1018 908-722-0700 [email protected]
Attorneys at Law
1
STATISTICS*
Attorneys at Law
2006 EEOC received 12,025 sex harassment complaints Annually, victims of sex harassment recoup upwards of $50 million from EEOC cases alone (not including NJ Division of Civil Rights complaints) Innumerable cases in state court The high profile case - $11.6 million punitives in Knicks case.
*Star Ledger Op Ed, October 2007, following jury award in Knicks case.
2
DEFINITIONS OF HARASSMENT
Attorneys at Law
Types of Harassment Quid pro quo
- (literally, “this for that”) an employee’s job advancement or continued employment or employment assignments are conditioned on submission to sexual demands or an employee suffers job detriment for refusing to submit to demands.
Hostile work environment
abusive working environment.
- conduct that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an 3
THE FOUR PART TEST
Attorneys at Law
Courts will use a four part test to determine whether a hostile working environment exists:
The complained-of conduct … 1) would not have occurred
but for gender
, the employee’s
2) and was severe or pervasive
enough to make a
3) reasonable woman
believe that (not hypersensitive plaintiffs) 4) the
conditions of employment are altered and
the working environment is
hostile or abusive
.
4
THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT’S LEHMANN DECISION
Attorneys at Law
Lehmann v. Toys ‘R’ Us, Inc.
Addresses the scope of an employer’s liability for a supervisor’s sexual harassment that results in a hostile work environment.
To state the claim:
a “female plaintiff must allege conduct that occurred because of her sex and that a reasonable woman would consider sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment.”
5
“THE HOOK”
Attorneys at Law
Protected Classes:
Sex Race Age Religion Color National Origin Disability Marital Status Sexual Orientation Gender Identity Domestic Partners Civil Unions Military Service You can’t discriminate against these classes.
You can’t harass someone because they belong to one of these classes.
6
SOME EXAMPLES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Verbal
Attorneys at Law
Referring to an adult as a girl, hunk, doll, babe, or honey Whistling at someone, cat calls Making sexual comments about a person's body Making sexual comments or innuendoes Turning work discussions to sexual comments Telling sexual jokes or stories Asking about sexual fantasies, preferences, or history Asking personal questions about social or sexual life Making sexual comments about a person's clothing, anatomy, or looks Repeatedly asking out a person who is not interested Making kissing sounds, howling, and smacking lips Telling lies or spreading rumors about a person's personal sex life 7
SOME EXAMPLES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Non-Verbal
Attorneys at Law
Looking a person up and down (elevator eyes) Staring at someone Blocking a person's path Following the person Giving personal gifts Displaying sexually suggestive visuals Making facial expressions such as winking, throwing kisses, or licking lips Making sexual gestures with hands or through body movements 8
SOME EXAMPLES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Physical
Attorneys at Law
Giving a massage around the neck or shoulders Touching the person's clothing, hair, or body Hanging around a person Hugging, kissing, patting, or stroking Touching or rubbing oneself against another person Standing close or brushing up against a person 9
Attorneys at Law
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
(U.S. Supreme Court)
A plaintiff does not need to show psychological injury in order to prevail on a claim of hostile work environment sexual harassment. (i.e., plaintiff need not prove the harassment “seriously affected [her] psychological well-being or led her to suffer injury.”) 10
Attorneys at Law
Tarr v. Ciasulli (N.J. Supreme Court)
Plaintiff can obtain redress for mental anguish, embarrassment without showing severe emotional or physical ailment.
Less stringent standard of proof than required for tort-based emotional distress cause of action.
Expert may not be necessary to meet proofs.
11
GENERALIZED HARASSMENT
Attorneys at Law
Lombardi v. Cosgrove (Federal)
One outburst by supervisor in which he used curse words not enough to make a working environment hostile or abusive.
Dungee v. Northeast Foods, Inc. (Federal)
Stray Remarks Doctrine
BUT SEE Ferraro v. Bell Atlantic (State)
Single outburst where supervisor referred to employee as a “bitch” may be evidence of hostile work environment.
12
AIDER/ABETTOR LIABILITY
Attorneys at Law
* Liability for discrimination when one knowingly gives substantial assistance or encouragement to the unlawful conduct of the employer.
Consider: 1) The nature of the act encouraged 2) The amount of assistance given by the supervisor 3) Whether the supervisor was present at the time of the asserted harassment 4) The supervisor’s relations to the others, and 5) The state of mind of the supervisor 13
AIDER/ABETTOR LIABILITY
(CONT’D)
Attorneys at Law
Brown Sanders alleged Thomas aided and abetted the harassment of MSG. The jury found “yes” as to hostile work environment, but “no” as to retaliation (because Dolan said he was sole decision maker on her termination following complaints of harassment).
14
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS OF FELLOW EMPLOYEES AND OUTSIDERS
Attorneys at Law
The EEOC has issued guidelines on sexual harassment which prohibit harassment by both fellow employees and non-employees: An employer may be action.
responsible for the acts of non-employees
where the employer knows or should have known of the conduct and fails to take immediate and appropriate corrective 15
CO-WORKER HARASSMENT
Attorneys at Law
When a co-worker engages in harassing conduct, the employer is liable only if management knew,
known
remedial action.
or in the exercise of reasonable care should have
, about the campaign of harassment and failed to take prompt 16
THIRD PARTY HARASSMENT
Attorneys at Law
Third party harassment is always a matter of hostile work environment harassment.
Employer liability is based on negligence: Whether the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take reasonable corrective action.
17
THIRD PARTY HARASSMENT
Attorneys at Law
CONTROL
EEOC GUIDELINES – Employer liability depends “on the basis of the total facts and
circumstances of each case, including employer knowledge, corrective action,
control, and other legal responsibility.” An employer who condones or tolerates the creation of a hostile work environment should be held liable regardless of whether the environment was created by a co-employee or a non employee, since the employer ultimately controls the conditions of this work environment.
18
RETALIATION
Attorneys at Law
The NJLAD provides that “[i]t shall be an unlawful employment practice **** for any person to take reprisals against any person because he/she has opposed any practices or acts forbidden under this act or because he/she has filed a complaint, testified or assisted in any proceeding under this act.” N.J.S.A. 10:5-12d.
19
RETALIATION
(CONT’D)
Attorneys at Law
Goal of recognizing retaliation claim:
“to promote the integrity of the underlying antidiscrimination policies of the Act by protecting against reprisals ‘any person’ who has sought to protect his or her own rights not to be discriminated against or who has acted in support of such conduct.” 20
RETALIATION
(CONT’D)
Attorneys at Law
Under LAD, a person engages in “ protected activity ” when that person opposes any practice that is unlawful under the LAD, such as gender discrimination. EXAMPLE: The plaintiff employee engaged in a protected activity when she turned to various levels of management with complaints regarding work environment sexual harassment and where management knew of the harassment.
21
RETALIATION
(CONT’D)
Attorneys at Law
A plaintiff must show an employer’s retaliatory motive
Usually there is no smoking gun document. Courts allow plaintiffs to rely on surrounding circumstances as evidence of retaliatory motive, such as: 1) Plaintiff was singled out by the company for enforcement of certain rules 2) The company failed to perform a thorough investigation of plaintiff’s complaints 3) The company initiated an extensive investigation of her work history 4) An employer’s timing in reassignment or termination – did it coincide with complaints of harassment?
22
E-MAIL/INTERNET ISSUES
Attorneys at Law
People will say in email what they would never say in person Email is a record Delete does not mean delete Employers will respond to harassing email under the same standards applicable to all harassment claims Emails can be evidence of other claims of discrimination 23
E-MAIL POLICIES/ISSUES
Attorneys at Law
Blakey v. Continental Airlines
Co-employees who allegedly published derogatory and insulting remarks about plaintiff on an on-line computer bulletin board which they knew would be published in New Jersey, could be subject to jurisdiction in New Jersey.
Also, simply because electronic bulletin board was located outside of the workplace it does not mean it is not part of the workplace and did not mean that employer might have no duty to correct harassment taking place through use of the electronic source.
Harassment can occur in a “work-related” setting.
Under Blakey, employer did not have duty to monitor employee’s private communications in NJ. This changed in 2005 in Doe v. XYC.
24
Employer’s Duty To Stop/ Report Worker’s Porn Surfing
Attorneys at Law
Doe v. XYC Corporation
Prior to Doe, employers were obligated to protect employees from hostile work environment.
Ruling in this case expands that obligation to protect 3 rd parties.
“We hold that an employer who is on notice that one of its employees is using a workplace computer to access pornography, possibly child pornography, has a duty to investigate the employee’s activities and to take prompt and effective action to stop the unauthorized activity, lest it result in harm to innocent third-parties. No privacy interest of the employee stands in the way of this duty on the part of the employer.” 25
E-MAIL/INTERNET POLICIES
Attorneys at Law
Personal use of E-Mails/Internet at work is very high Companies must respond under the same standards applicable to all harassment claims Evidence of Other Claims of Discrimination Adopt E-Mail/Internet Policies Reserve the Right to Review and Monitor 26
ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
Attorneys at Law
Both federal and state courts now allow for the demand and production of electronically stored information.
– How Does This Relate to Sex Harassment?
Predominance of e-mails and use of electronic means to perpetuate harassment Proof of effective policies Litigation preparation 27
Where Do You Find Electronically Stored Information (ESI)?
• Laptops/Desktops • Servers • Phone Systems (VoIP) • Printers & Copiers • PDA’s/Cell Phones • CD’s/DVD’s • USB Thumb Drives
Attorneys at Law
28
Production of Documents R. 4:18-1 & FRCP 34
Attorneys at Law
Amendment Implications
Employer defendants are integral part of process:
Assess and understand company’s information management Meta data is potentially discoverable; sound recordings are also to be considered as potentially discoverable Attorney and client must work to identify: – key custodians – – relevant ESI on the client’s system locations of data storage devices 29
Production of Documents R. 4:18-1 & FRCP 34
Attorneys at Law
Amendment Implications
Preservation obligation attaches once “triggers” surface: – notice of a lawsuit – litigation that is “reasonably anticipated” Attorney and client must preserve ESI 30
Production of Documents R. 4:18-1 & FRCP 34
Attorneys at Law
Amendment Implications
Notify employees of obligations to preserve ESI Consider offices in other geographic locations Formulate a cost-effective strategy for reviewing and managing ESI 31
Production of Documents R. 4:18-1 & FRCP 34
Attorneys at Law
Amendment Implications
Suspend automated document destruction policies, and place “hold” on key ESI 32
Production of Documents R. 4:18-1 & FRCP 34 (CONT’D)
Attorneys at Law
Litigation “holds” must be: – communicated in writing – issued by someone with authority – tailored to identify purpose of the hold – specific in detailing which data should be maintained and why – periodically confirmed 33
Case Management Conference R. 4:5B-2, R. 4:10-2 & FRCP 16
Attorneys at Law
Amendment Implications
Implement procedures to ensure compliance Discuss the “reasonable accessibility” of ESI Must make these efforts a “high priority” Assemble team of corporate representatives Formalize instruction to employees in writing Monitor employee preservation efforts Factor costs of e-discovery in litigation budget 34
EMPLOYER DEFENSES
Attorneys at Law
Smith v. Nordstrom
A company which has a (1) well-publicized anti-harassment policy (2) with an effective complaint structure, and (3) which responds promptly and forcefully when apprized of misconduct, cannot be held vicariously liable for that misconduct.
35
EMPLOYER DEFENSES
Attorneys at Law
Gaines v. Bellino. et al.
Plaintiff, a County employee, alleged she was sexually harassed by a supervisor in 1990. Her co-workers encouraged her to file a formal complaint against him, as permitted under the sexual harassment policy in place. She initially chose not to file a formal complaint. However, she did informally complain to various people, including supervisors. Employer was denied affirmative defense. Supervisors admitted they had not received training on anti-harassment. Supervisors joked when they heard complaint or told her to drop it because no one would believe plaintiff. “An employer’s anti harassment policy must be more than the mere words encapsulated in the policy.” 36
PREVENTIVE POLICIES
Attorneys at Law
To establish an effective anti-harassment policy in the workplace, an employer must establish the following:
1) Formal policies prohibiting harassment in the workplace.
2) Complaint structures for employees’ use, both formal and informal.
3) Anti-harassment training, which must be mandatory for supervisors and managers, and must be available to all employees of the organization.
4) The existence of effective sensing or monitoring mechanisms to check the trustworthiness of the policies and complaint structures.
37
PREVENTIVE POLICIES
(CONT’D)
Attorneys at Law
5) An unequivocal commitment from the highest level of the employer that harassment would not be tolerated, and demonstration of that policy commitment by consistent practice.
6) Formalize instruction to employees in writing 7) Monitor employee preservation efforts 8) Factor costs of e-discovery in litigation budget 38
PREVENTIVE POLICIES
(CONT’D)
Attorneys at Law
An employee’s known or suspected illegal activities impose new duties on employers:
1) Conduct thorough investigation.
2) Take prompt and effective remedial action to stop the activities (may need to terminate employee).
3) Prevent harm to third parties is the goal.
4) May need to enlist help of law enforcement under appropriate circumstances.
5) Preserve evidence to justify and explain employer’s actions.
Failure to comply with these duties can subject employer to liability to third parties harmed by the illegal activities.
(Doe v. XYC case) 39
TO DETERMINE IF YOUR BEHAVIOR IS INAPPROPRIATE, ASK YOURSELF THE FOLLOWING:
Attorneys at Law
1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Would you behave the same way (or say the same things) if a family member was within hearing distance?
How would your comments or behavior appear to others if it were featured on the front page of your local newspaper or in a clip on the evening news?
Would you want someone to behave the same way toward your son or daughter?
Is there equal power and participation between the person I’m interacting with?
Would I act the same way with my supervisor or if my supervisor was watching?
WHEN IN DOUBT, DON’T!!
40
SEXUAL HARASSMENT: CHALLENGES IN THE EVOLVING WORKPLACE
Presented by: Annmarie Simeone Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.
Somerville, NJ 08876-1018 908-722-0700 [email protected]
Attorneys at Law
41