LIGHTING BASED ENERGY EFFICIENCY UPGRADES

Download Report

Transcript LIGHTING BASED ENERGY EFFICIENCY UPGRADES

LIGHTING BASED ENERGY
EFFICIENCY UPGRADES - LESSONS
LEARNED
Christopher Richard, PhD, P.E., CxA
Smart Building Systems, Inc.
April 17, 2013
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
Project Overview
Proposed Solutions
Accepted Solutions
Issues Encountered /Lessons Learned
Conclusion
2
Project Overview
• ARRA-funded lighting
replacement and
controls upgrade for GSA
• Project dates: January
2010 through August
2012
• Building size: Eight
federal courthouses &
office buildings in
Alabama and Georgia,
~2.5 million ft2
combined.
• Four designs taken to
implementation
3
Diverse Building Characteristics
• Ages
– historical(1932) to modern (2002)
• Sizes
– 100,000 SF to over 1million SF
– 5 floors to 25 floors
• Uses
– call centers, courtrooms, private offices, large
open offices, prisoner holding areas, etc.
4
Proposed Solutions
•
•
•
•
•
Luminaire Replacements
Spectrally Enhanced Lighting
Relamping
Delamping
Controls
– Local
– Global
– Daylight Harvesting
5
Luminaire Replacement
• Primary ECM:
3 lamp 32WT8
replaced with 2 lamp
28WT5
– Improved energy
performance
• Parabolic luminaires
replaced with
volumetric luminaires
– improved light
distribution with no “cave
effect”
6
Spectrally Enhanced Lighting
• Take advantage of
human perception of
brightness
• Use lamps with
higher Color
Temperature /CRI
Lamps (e.g. 5000K 82
CRI vs more common
3500K 75CRI) more
like natural daylight
• Use lower light
intensity (Fc)
• Increased visual
acuity
7
Spectrally Enhanced Lighting
• Lower light levels (fc) result in equal visual
acuity and perceived brightness
• http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/news
/news_detail.html?news_id=10382
8
Relamping and Delamping
• Relamping
– Replace older technology lamps (e.g.
incandescent) with newer, more efficient lamp
types (e.g. CFL or LED), cost permitting
• Delamping
– Remove lamps in over lit areas to comply with
recent energy guidelines (AHRAE 90.1)
– Replace 3 lamp luminaires with 2 lamp
luminaires
9
Improved Controls
• Local – Occupancy and Vacancy Sensors
• Global – Building wide lighting controllers
(multiple OFF sweeps per day based on time)
• Daylight Harvesting
– Dimming or extinguishing lightings during times
of abundant natural light
10
Accepted Solutions
•
•
•
•
•
Luminaire Replacements Retrofits
Spectrally Enhanced Lighting
Relamping
Delamping
Controls
– Local
– Global Rezoning
– Daylight Harvesting
11
Retrofit Kits
• Less costly than full luminaire replacements
• Structural parts of the original luminaire
remain
• Kits still allow for
conversion from
parabolic to volumetric
• Kits still allow for
3 lamp to 2 lamp
conversion
12
Rejection of SEL
• GSA disapproved SEL due to unproven nature
of the approach
• GSA did approve conversion to consistent
higher color temperature lamps (4100K vs
5000K for SEL and the original 3500K for
most existing lamps)
13
Local Controls
DT Ceiling
Mounted
Sensor
PIR
Switch
Sensor
14
Rezoning
Goal is to reduce the number of lights
energized for a single person or small group
working in an area of the building outside of
normal business hours.
With flour globally controllable zones per floor,
only a quarter of a floor
15
Zone Layout
Existing wiring and cost restriction limited the
project to two zones (vs proposed four) per floor.
16
ISSUES ENCOUNTERED
AND
LESSONS LEARNED
17
Retrofit kits
• Kit Installation was an issues. Not all 2x4 recessed
luminaires are created equal
• Historic building contained a large variety of luminaire
styles and sizes
• Some sites had “metric” 2x4 (600mm x 1200mm)
• Had to resocket and reballast in some locations as kits
would simply not fit.
18
Occupancy and Vacancy Sensors
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sensor density (Cost vs. Coverage)
Ceiling height (wall mounted vs ceiling mounted)
High walled cubicles
“Added” walls during remodel
Doors, furniture and other obstructions
White noise generator
Sensor settings
– Occupancy mode (auto on) or vacancy mode (manual )
– Dual Tech trigger setting (e.g. both to trigger on, either to hold
on)
– Time delay settings
– Sensitivity
19
General
• Wiring
– Renovations make existing circuits poor zone
choices for control zones (local or global)
– Wiring not up to code
– No neutrals a switch location (can’t use most
dual technology sensors)
20
CONCLUSIONS
21