A Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State in OECD Countries
Download
Report
Transcript A Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State in OECD Countries
GLOBES conference,
Tel Aviv, 12-13 December 2010
Key Labour Market and Social Policy Challenges
facing Israel: an OECD perspective
John P. Martin
Director for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, OECD
(www.oecd.org/els/)
Israel has weathered the global recession
rather well
OECD harmonised unemployment rates in selected OECD countries, December 2007 to October 2010*
%
October 2010
December 2007
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
* June 2010 for Greece; August 2010 for the United Kingdom; September 2010 for Denmark, and Norway; and 2010 Q3 for Israel (OECD harmonised
unemployment rate data are not available on a monthly basis for this country).
Source: OECD Main Economic Indicators.
The key labour market & social policy
challenge is too-high poverty
Denmark
6.1
Hungary
6.4
Netherlands
Arabs
OECD
average
Haredim
Others (Non-Arab, Non-Haredi)
7.2
Sweden
8.4
70
Canada
11.4
Italy
11.4
2005
60
2007
Korea
2006
Japan
Poverty rate (%)
15.0
15.7
Russian Federation
17.0
Turkey
17.0
United States
17.3
Israel
19.9
Mexico
21.0
0
5
10
15
Poverty rates
20
25
O
E
C
D
2007
50
OECD
average
40
1997
1997
30
20
1997
2007
10
20
30
40
50
Employment rate (%)
Poverty rate thresholds set at 50% of median (equivalent) household income data refer to the late
2000s from the OECD Income Distribution questionnaire, and OECD (2010) ,Labour Market and
Social Policy reviews: Israel
60
70
Israel is a divided society, and demographic
trends warrant inclusive policy action quickly
The proportion of children entering primary school
belonging to the poor minority groups will increase
from just below 50% at present to 75% in 2030.
Employment is the best route out of poverty
Policy should change now to increase employment
among Arabs and Haredim….
Mobilizing these resources is key to enhancing
economic growth and social cohesion
Public policy and investment towards minority
groups has to become more effective
Low-paid work is relatively widespread
in Israel
Sweden
Italy
OECD-22 15.9%
Portugal
Finland
Denmark
Belgium
Australia
Ireland
France
Japan
New Zealand
Czech Rep.
Greece
Spain
Germany
Netherlands
Poland
Canada
United States
United Kingdom
ISRAEL
Hungary
Korea
0
10
20
30
Prevalence of low-paid work: per cent of employees with earnings of less than two-thirds of the
national median. Source: OECD (2010) ,Labour Market and Social Policy reviews: Israel
An effective policy response includes better
enforcement of labour laws...
Israel has a general problem of failing to enforce its
labour laws.
Especially detrimental to the more vulnerable workers
(low-paid, foreign, employed through temporary work
agencies or sub-contracted).
Ineffective enforcement of labour laws does
not get the policy attention it deserves
Labour inspectorate
underfunded and
understaffed
Sanctions for
employers who fail to
respect labour laws are
derisory
Policy has to become more effective: a New
Deal for Arabs?
Government should lead by example by stamping
out discriminatory practices:
Recent initiative to invest 800mn NIS in
infrastructure in 13 Arab localities is a step, but
it’s too small to overcome large infrastructural or
educational deficiencies.
More investment in Arab schools to redress
disadvantage
Take enforcing public sector employment quotas
seriously: currently at 7% rather than the avowed
objective of 12%.
Israel needs more effective employmentoriented social policies...
Very disappointing “Wisconsin” fell through.
OECD evidence shows that well-designed and
implemented mutual obligation policies can work:
Clients have to look for work/engage in training or be subject
to a benefit sanction
Policy has to provide an effective package of employment
services, vocational training and childcare supports. Spend a
bit more on cost-effective ALMPs
Counsellors in Israeli PES have far too high a caseload (350
unemployed compared with an OECD norm of 100).
To some extent you get the poverty rates
you are willing to pay for.
Increase EITC payments
for low-paid workers to
give a real incentive to
take work
France
Sweden
Denmark
Germany
Italy
This could be partly
financed by reducing child
allowances.
United Kingdom
Japan
Canada
OECD
19.3%
United States
Israel
Turkey
Mexico
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Public social expenditure as % of GDP. Data concern 2007: OECD Social Expenditure database, .
Foreign workers in Israel make up a greater
proportion of the labour force than in most
OECD countries
Foreign workers (FWs) seem to displace Israeli workers.
25
2007/08
20
15
10
5
0
Foreign workers as % of the Labour Force: OECD Review.Source: OECD (2010), Labour Market and Social
Policy reviews: Israel
The system of foreign labour
management needs improving
Impose labour market test and prevailing wage and
working conditions on employers recruiting from abroad.
Only recruit workers for jobs which Israelis refuse or
cannot fill
High agency fees ineffective in encouraging
employers to hire locally, exploitative and negatively
affect employment conditions
Consider unlimited stay for employment for jobs
where demand is structural/permanent
Favour cross-border workers over foreign workers
...and improve the labour system for foreign
workers (continued).
Improve transparency and address illegal brokerage
fees
Use short-term permits for seasonal work in
agriculture
Eliminate middlemen and labour brokers
Develop bilateral agreements for recruitment
Reinforce inspectorate, including with interpreters.
Strengthen sanctions for employers and bar
violators from future recruitment
Further reading
www.oecd.org/els/israel2010