Transcript Dia 1

‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
ACLE
Fourth Annual Competition & Regulation Meeting on
the specialty topic of ‘EC Competition Enforcement
Data’
Eline Poelmans, Research Doctoral Candidate,
Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
1. The emergence of a ‘common’ competition policy in the ECSC
2. The competition laws of the ECSC
3. Data Issues
4. Conclusions
5. Acknowledgements
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
1.
The emergence of a ‘common’ competition policy in the ECSC
•
•
•
US: first federal ‘competition law’: Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)
Europe: first ‘European’ competition laws only in the second half 20th century
1952: foundation of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) by West
Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, The Netherlands and Luxembourg
Analysis of
- how the concept of ‘competition’ was perceived
- how the ECSC competition laws were implemented in the first 15 years of the
ECSC (1952-1967)
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
2. The competition laws of the ECSC
•
The obligation of the HA to liquidate any restrictions on the competition
principle (articles 2 and 5)
•
Article 65: deals with prohibiting ‘anticompetitive agreements’
•
Article 66: deals with ‘concentrations’ and ‘misuses’ of economic power
•
A ‘notification obligation’ to the High Authority (for article 65 and 66)
•
Made law by the HA in July 1953 for article 65 and in May 1954 for article 66
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
3.
Data Issues for ‘agreements’ and ‘concentrations’
eg. for ‘concentrations’
•
I. Approval Ratio
•
1. Method
- # approval requests for ‘concentrations’ submitted to the HA
- # approved requests for concentrations
•
2. Sources
- ‘yearbooks’ of the ECSC + common yearbook of the ECSC, Euratom and the EEC
- other sources (Archives of the European Commission in Brussels)
- the authorizations for concentrations made by the HA
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
•
3. Approval ratio (ar) (eg for the ‘concentrations – article 66)
136 [ ie # of approved concentration requests ]
ar = -------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 0.415 ( = 42 %)
328 [ ie # of concentration approval requests]
But ...
(see table: Requested versus approved concentrations in the ECSC between 1952 and 1967)
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
Year
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
T
# new procedures
requested
0
1
14
38
40
11
12
20
14
14
16
19
31
39
34
25
328
Total # new
procedures
requested
(cumulative)
0
1
15
53
93
104
116
136
150
164
180
199
230
269
303
328
328
# procedures
approved
0
1
6
4
9
7
5
7
5
7
6
8
16
22
21
12
136
Total #
procedures
approved
(cumulative)
0
1
7
11
20
27
32
39
44
51
57
65
81
103
124
136
136
# procedures
concluded
0
1
13
14
18
15
13
38
18
10
10
10
19
25
28
35
267
Total #
procedures
concluded
(cumulative)
0
1
14
28
46
61
74
112
130
140
150
160
179
204
232
267
267
Pending at the end
of the year
0
0
1
25
47
43
42
24
20
24
30
39
51
65
71
61
/
Total #
procedures at the
beginning of the
year (pending +
new)
0
1
14
39
65
58
55
62
38
34
40
49
70
90
99
96
/
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
Year
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
T
# requests that weren’t
approved (yet) or
where it wasn’t
necessary to submit a
request
0
0
7
10
9
8
8
31
13
3
4
2
3
3
7
23
131
(1) Art 66 not
applicable
0
0
1
7
7
3
8
29
12
3
3
2
2
3
3
9
92
(2) Further
investigation needed
(§5)
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
(3) Approval request
for concentration that
occured before
ratification of article
66
0
0
4
2
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
12
(4) Exemption (§3)
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
14
24
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
•
•
136 [ ie # of approved concentration requests ]
ar = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 0.596 (= 60%)
228 [ ie # of conclusions (267)
- # of pending investigations (3)
- # of requests for concentrations already established before
article 66 became law (12)
- # of exemptions (24) ]
 approval ratio increases from approximately 42 to 60 %
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
•
II. Characteristic features of the companies that were successful in having their
‘concentration’ requests approved by the High Authority
•
Sources
-
‘yearbooks’ of the ECSC + common yearbook of the ECSC, Euratom and the EEC
other sources (Archives of the European Commission in Brussels)
the authorizations for concentrations made by the HA
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
•Successful approval requests by country (1952-1967)
25
20
Italy
the Netherlands
Luxembourg
15
Belgium
Community
10
France
5
West Germany
ECSC
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
0
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
•
Possible questions: concentrations
–
–
–
•
by country (also ‘cross border’ decisions)
by type of concentration
• simplified: eg coal, steel or coal-steel concentrations
• more specific: different subdivisions:
– steel-steelprocessing
– coal-carbopetrochemicals
– etc…
by concentration procedure
• acquisition of part of the shares
• establishment of a new firm
• merger
• etc…
Conclusions: biased by big countries (ie West Germany)
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
•
Goal: analysis of
-
how the concept of ‘competition’ was perceived
how the ECSC competition laws were implemented in the first 15 years of the ECSC
(1952-1967)
 were there certain characteristic features of the concentrations in certain countries?
 can we find a link between the type of approved concentration and the relative
importance of the coal and steel industries in the total industry of the different countries?
 what historical explanations can we find?
 etc…
‘Agreements and Concentrations’ in the ECSC Countries
between 1952 and 1967: Data Issues
4. Conclusions
5. Acknowledgements
Eline Poelmans, Research Doctoral Candidate,
Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium