Transcript Document

Homology Modeling
David Shiuan
Department of Life Science
and Institute of Biotechnology
National Dong Hwa University
Why Modeling ?

X-ray diffraction  electron diffraction
map  electron density map 

Missing chains and residues in PDB
structures

No structure available
Erwin Schrodinger
John Pople
1964 Noble
Computation
Chemistry
Walter Kohn
1960 Noble
DensityFunction
theory
Polypeptide Chain
Structural Models are a unique source of
information
The first solved protein crystal structure was of Sperm
Whale myoglobin determined by Max Perutz and Sir
John Cowdery Kendrew in 1958. They were awarded
the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1962
Modeling – Prediction of 3D Structures

Homology Modeling
Structures of similar molecules available

Threading
Prediction-based threading detecting the fold type
and aligning a protein of unknown structure and a
protein of known structure for low levels of sequence
identity ( < 25%)

Ab initio
predicts the structure of proteins from the sequence
and using molecular energy calculations (Schrodinger
equation), do not use experimental parameters.
Threading, A new approach to protein
fold recognition. Nature 358 (1992 ) 86-89

An alternative strategy of recognizing known
motifs or folds in sequences looks promising

Threading is an approach to fold recognition
which used a detailed 3-D representation of
protein structure. The idea was to physically
"thread" a sequence of amino acid side chains
onto a backbone structure (a fold) and to evaluate
this proposed 3-D structure using a set of pair
potentials and (importantly) a separate solvation
potential.
View saccharide with
JMol-Applet
Chemis3D-Applet
Ab initio
Structure Prediction
Bystroff C & Shao Y. (2002). Fully automated
ab initio protein structure prediction using ISITES, HMMSTR and ROSETTA.
Bioinformatics 18 Suppl 1, S54-61.
Comparative Protein Modelling

Proteins with high sequence similarity is reflected
by distinct structure similarity

Comparative protein modelling (Homology
Modeling) is presently the most reliable method.

Comparative model building consist of the
extrapolation of the structure for a new (target)
sequence from the known 3D-structure of related
family members (templates).
Building The Model
1. Framework construction

By averaging the
position of each atom
in the target sequence,
based on the location
of the corresponding
atoms in the template
Building The Model
2. Building non-conserved loops

Although most of the known
3D-structures available
share no overall similarity
with the template, there may
be similarities in the loop
regions, and these can be
inserted as loop structure in
the new protein model
Building The Model
3. Completing the backbone

Since the loop building only
adds Ca atoms, the
backbone carbonyl and
nitrogens must be
completed in these regions.

This step can be performed
by using a library of
pentapeptide backbone
fragments derived from the
PDB entries
Building The Model
4. Adding side chains

For many of the protein
side chains there is no
structural information
available in the templates.
These cannot therefore be
built during the
framework generation
and must be added later
Building The Model
5. Model refinement

Idealisation of bond
geometry and removal of
unfavourable non-bonded
contacts can be performed
by energy minimisation
with force fields such as
CHARMM, AMBER or
GROMOS.
How to Superimpose Two Proteins




Open the PDB file 11MUP
Open the PDB file 21OBP
Color by secondary structure
Use the "Iterative Magic Fit"
or the“Improve Fit" item of
the "Tools" menu
How SWISS-MODEL works
Probabilities of SWISS-MODEL accuracy
for target-template identity classes
224 aa
224 aa
Example/Swiss
Model:
Insulin-like growth
factors in C. elegans.
We have identified three new families of insulin
homologs in C. elegans.
Comparative protein modelling remarkably confirms
these predictions