Transcript Slide 1
Greenville County Schools An Alternative Approach to Financing and Delivery of a Capital Program October 7, 2007 © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Greenville County School District, SC • 2006-2007 membership- 66,682 • District covers 800 square miles • 54th largest school district in the US and growing • 94 Schools – – – – – – Elementary – 47 Middle – 17 High – 14 Career / Technology – 4 Child Development – 5 Special Centers - 7 © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE This is Greenville… © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE But this is ALSO Greenville…. © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE The Growing Facilities Problem • In November of 1998, almost 10,000 of the 61,000 students in Greenville County were in “temporary” classrooms • Growing by around 1000 students per year • Lunch began at 10:30 with 3 shifts, only ½ students had seats in each shift • Most of the 83 schools were old and in desperate need of repair or replacement • Inflation was growing faster than their ability to pay • 2 failed referenda © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE SDGC LRFP…What happened? • • • • • • • The Baby Boom Schools got old Tax Cut Fever Parents became focused on Education Mold • Asbestos • Lead Paint • Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Baby Boom Echo Tax Cut Fever #2 In-Migration © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Impact of Inflation The same 1,000 student school: 1995 Cost = $6,000,000 2001 Cost = $11,500,000 (a real cost increase of 14% per year) © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE SDGC Long Range Building Plan • 1993 cost to cure = $336,000,000 – annual expenditure $30,000,000 • 1997 cost to cure = $554,000,000 – annual expenditure $40,000,000 • 1999 cost to cure = $712,000,000 – annual expenditure $65,000,000 • 2002 cost to cure = $783,000,000 • Debt Situation – Constitutional Debt Limit = $100,000,000 – Existing Debt = $100,000,000 • Projected to take 28+ years to complete LRFP © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Property Tax Increases (1990-2000) 90 70 Tax Rate 60 50 40 30 20 14 10 14 13 12 12 12 11 10 10 10 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 1990 © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Years to completion -----------------------Reassessment------------------------ 80 14 The Bottom Line “An analysis of the district's long-range facilities plan last year showed that the district might never have been able to complete the remaining schools with conventional financing, and construction costs would have topped $1.4 billion instead of the $800 million projected by Institutional Resources.” Greenville News, May 21, 2002 © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE The Perfect Storm • • • • • Confluence of factors made a solution possible A champion on the board of trustees An administration willing to take the chance A motivated group of minds from the private sector A community fed up with the decaying schools AND rising taxes © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE The Plan • “Equal” school facilities across the district • Fund all construction now through innovative use of installment purchase bonds • Maintain millage at or below 42.5 mills by using conservative growth assumptions in tax revenue • Complete the program in 5 years • Leverage economies of scale in design, procurement and construction to achieve cost savings • Allow the District to use a 5 year planning horizon © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Installment Purchase Revenue Bond Structure School District Creates Non-Profit Issuer (63-20 Corporation) Non-Profit Corporation Issuer Purchase Bonds $$ Bondholders Debt Service Installment Purchase Revenue Bonds Proceeds to School Construction Annual GO Issuance © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Bond Proceeds Labor Forecast- LRFP Construction Personnel Forecast – Direct Labor – Current LRFP CHART IIIb.1(E)1A © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Labor Forecast- Recommended Construction Personnel Forecast – Direct Labor – Recommended InRe Plan CHART IIIb.1(E)1B © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE The Reality • • • • Implementation was delayed by lawsuit First school groundbreaking in March 2002 Construction cost escalation impacted budgets Program converted from 2/3 renovate and 1/3 new to 2/3 new and 1/3 renovate • Assessed value of property and tax revenues grew faster than expected • Funds from additional growth were used to pay for “growth” schools • Expected completion of program mid-2008 (7 years versus projected 5) © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Construction Cost Escalation Impacts Total Budget 4600 4000 Actual timeframe to let contracts 4400 3500 Orginal expected timeframe to let contracts 4200 3000 4000 2500 Materials Cost Index 3800 2000 3600 Building Cost Index Source: Engineering News Record © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE 7/1/2006 4/1/2006 1/1/2006 10/1/2005 7/1/2005 4/1/2005 1/1/2005 10/1/2004 7/1/2004 4/1/2004 1/1/2004 10/1/2003 7/1/2003 4/1/2003 1/1/2003 10/1/2002 7/1/2002 4/1/2002 1/1/2002 10/1/2001 7/1/2001 4/1/2001 1/1/2001 10/1/2000 7/1/2000 4/1/2000 1500 1/1/2000 3400 Total Costs* 2041 Completion $3.21 Billion 2007 Completion $1.88 Billion BEST Program Best Program Installment Purchase “Pay As You Go” Traditional Financing 5% inflation 5% Inflation *Source- Greenville County School District © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE 2052 Completion $4.982 Billion “Pay As You Go” Traditional Financing 6% inflation 6% Inflation © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Other Highlights • Community brainstorming sessions yielded 528 documented suggestions of which 418 were implemented • Minority participation increased 9 times over previous construction programs • “Mass customization” through development of automated, district-wide ed specs customized for each school’s curriculum and programmatic needs © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Other Highlights (cont.) • Development of comprehensive, district-wide design guide • Innovative techniques and technologies to reduce future maintenance, operations or capital renewal expenditures • “Green Schools” implemented • Long-term maintenance plan and forecasting system developed • All school design, warranty and maintenance documentation electronically captured and stored in an online retrieval system © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Prototype Design Mountain View ES Simpsonville ES Blythe ES Robert E. Cashion ES Paris ES Thomas E. Kerns ES Sue Cleveland ES © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Southeast Area ES Cherrydale ES Monaview ES Tax Millage Used for Greenville Plan Where it Will Go if 5 Yr. Reassessments & Growth Match the Last 10 Years 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 14 0 © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Tax Revenue Impact 300,000,000 250,000,000 Total Value 42. 5 Mils (1) Value of 42.5 mils. 200,000,000 150,000,000 Total Funds "Requested" for Program by InRe (2) 100,000,000 Capacity Reserved By SDGC 50,000,000 Funds Required for $800 Million BEST Bonds Debt Service 0 2002 © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 Wall Street Reaction “The associated Standard & Poor’s underlying rating upgrade on Greenville County School District, SC’s GO bonds to ‘AA’ from ‘AA-’ reflects the district’s addressing of its unmet and significant capital needs by the issuance of the $800 million installment purchase revenue bonds, issued through BEST Corp. Prior to this issuance, the district was hampered by a restrictive, unvoted GO bond debt limit that seriously hindered its ability to effectively address, on a timely basis, its capital requirements.” Standard & Poor’s – March 11, 2002 “Moody’s Investors Service has upgraded the Greenville County School District general obligation underlying rating to Aa3 from A1. The rating upgrade affects $95 million of debt and is based on Moody’s belief that the district’s plan for funding its sizable capital program will result in a manageable debt burden while addressing pressing long term capital needs.” MANAGEABLE DEBT POSITION EVEN WITH SIZABLE BORROWING PLAN “Moody’s believes that the district’s plan to issue $760 million of Installment Purchase Revenue bonds through a non-profit entity will enable the school district to address pressing capital needs without placing significant fiscal constraint on the district” Moody’s Investors Service – August 22, 2001 © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE The Domino Effect School District Capital Needs Results Dorchester 2, SC $132 million Financed construction of 4 new schools, 6 renovations, and 2 site acquisitions to meet growing enrollment. The district was able to maintain the same tax millage and received a credit rating upgrade. Berkeley, SC $230 million Financed construction of 3 new schools and 7 additions and renovations while reducing millage by approximately 10%. $18 million in funds added to program from interest earnings. Lancaster, SC $39 million Financed construction of new schools for rapidly growing Indian Land area. Avoided 13.5 mill increase to fund existing debt and received ratings upgrade. Newberry, SC $84 million Financed 2 new schools, 7 additions and renovations, and additional technology. Maintained millage below their 56 mill self-imposed cap. Laurens, SC $16 million Financed construction of high school wing and the replacement of primary school. Maintained millage. Fort Mill, SC $84 million Financed 2 new elementary schools, additional wing at new high school, athletic facilities and technology upgrades. Maintained millage. © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Can This Be Accomplished Elsewhere? © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE This May Never be Done Again, but if you want to try: • • • • Have political courage Assemble a great team Clearly demonstrate and quantify needs Identify revenue source to pay for those needs with reasonable assumptions (including savings to be realized from program) • Develop a financing alternative that is cost effective Time = Money • Persevere, persevere, persevere © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Questions/ Comments © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE Contact Information Didi Abi-Arrage President, In Re Financial, LLC Tel. 864-918-3816 30 Patewood Drive, Suite 200 Greenville, SC 29615 [email protected] © InRe Financial, LLC DO NOT DUPLICATE