Fundamentals of Law (BL502)
Download
Report
Transcript Fundamentals of Law (BL502)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Law of Contract
Revision
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
6 elements of a valid contract
Objective\Subjective Tests
Domestic agreements
Invitation to Treat
Withdrawing an offer
Rejection of offer
Lapse of offer
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Law of Contract
Acceptance
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Accepting the Offer
Only person to whom the offer was made may
accept
Acceptance must be final & unqualified
Must be communicated to the person who made
the offer (some exceptions)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Accepting the Offer (Cont.)
Acceptance must be final & unqualified
“Subject to Formal Contract” – 3 possibilities
1. There is a contract & one of terms is that
documentation be prepared
2. There is a contract but nothing can
happen until contract prepared
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Accepting the Offer (Cont.)
Acceptance must be final & unqualified (cont.)
“Subject to Formal Contract” (cont.)
3. There is no contract
Masters v Cameron (S&OR p82)
Plastyne Products v Gall Engineering
(S&OR p83)
Communications after acceptance are
irrelevant
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Acceptance Must be Communicated
Silence does not amount to acceptance
Acceptance by large companies
Who must receive acceptance?
Depends on intention of parties
Acceptance usually occurs when the
communication is received in the ordinary
course of business or would have been
received if ordinary course of business were
followed
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Acceptance Must be Communicated
Internet
Electronic Transactions Act
Receipt occurs when it enters the
addressee’s designated information system
Otherwise, when it comes to attention of
addressee
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Acceptance Must be Communicated
Express Communication of Acceptance is not
necessary where
Implied from past dealings between parties
Industry custom
Acceptance indicated by conduct
Unilateral contracts
Postal rule applies
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Acceptance Must be Communicated
The Postal Rule
Applies where offeror has expressly or
impliedly accepted post as the means of
communication of acceptance
Acceptance occurs at time of posting not
receipt
Applies to all situations where noninstantaneous communications are used
Often determines jurisdiction
Berinkibon v Stahag Stahl (S&OR p 86)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Acceptance Must be Communicated
Mode & timing of acceptance must conform to
offeror’s requirements
BUT, nominating a mode of acceptance may not
set the only mode of service
Spectra v Pindari
Agent of the person to whom the offer was made
may accept on their behalf
Powell v Lee (S&OR p87)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Has an offer been
made?
No
No Contract
Yes
Did the offeror
intend to revoke
the offer?
Yes
Did the offeror
communicate
revocation?
No
Has the offer
lapsed?
No
Yes
Yes
No
Has acceptance
been received by
the offeror?
Yes
No
Contract
Yes
Was acceptance
made under the
postal rule?
No
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Fundamentals of Law
Consideration
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Two Types of Enforceable Agreement
Deeds
Contracts that comply with special rules
Do not require consideration
Simple contracts
Do require consideration
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Deed
In writing
Maker of deed must sign, seal and deliver the
document
Independent witness
Special attestation clause
SIGNED SEALED AND DELIVERED )
by the said JOE BLOGGS
)
in the presence of:
)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration
Every simple contract must be supported by
consideration
The law will not enforce a gratuitous or bare
promise
Lack of consideration may be overcome by
the equitable doctrine of estoppel
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
What is Consideration
Consideration must flow from both sides of the
contract
Can be:
A promise to do something
A promise not to do something
Doing something
Refraining from doing something
A benefit for the promisee
A benefit for a third person at the promisee’s direction
A detriment to the promisor
Anything of real value to the promisee
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration Must Move From Promisor
Only the person who has “paid” for the
promise can enforce it
Dunlop v Selfridge (S&OR p101)
Dunlop
Contract
Wholesaler
(bought tyres from Dunlop, sold to retailers)
Contract
Selfridges
(broke promise to wholesaler not to discount)
Called “Privity of Contract”
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Joint Promisee Rule
If a promise is made to two or more people
jointly then only one promise need give
consideration
All promisors must be parties to the contract
Coulls v Bagot Executor and Trustee Co
(S&OR p 102)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Privity of Contract - Exceptions
Statutory exceptions
Insurance Contracts entered into with the
intention of benefiting another
Where one party acts as agent for another
person
Contractual benefits held on trust for another
Contractual benefits may be assigned
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration May Not Be Past
A promise can be executed (i.e. present execution) or
executory (i.e. future execution) but cannot be past
A promise must be paid for but if consideration has
already been given then there is nothing being paid
for the new promise
Roscorla v Thomas (S&OR p103)
Settling unsettled aspects of a past transaction may
be consideration
Re Casey’s Patents: Stewart v Casey (S&OR
p104)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration May Be Inadequate
Consideration must be sufficient i.e. have
some value in the eyes of the law
Need not be equal in value to the promisor’s
promise
The very nature of contract law is to let the
parties make their own bargain
However, doctrine of unconscionable conduct
has developed to overcome resulting
injustices
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration Must Be Sufficient (Cont)
Settling disputes
Forbearance to sue (i.e. an offer not to sue) is
good consideration provided
The claim (defence) was reasonable
The promisee had an honest belief that the claim
had a reasonable chance of success
The promisee has not concealed any facts that
might affect the validity of the claim
Wigan v Edwards (S&OR p106)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration Must Be Sufficient (Cont)
Renegotiating a debt
Pinnel’s Case (S&OR p109)
( approved by House of Lords in Foakes v Beer)
Exceptions
Composition with creditors
Payment by third party
Ways around
Deed
Payment in kind
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration Must Be Sufficient (Cont)
Promising to perform an existing contract is
not consideration
To be binding, there must be a promise to do
something additional to contracted duty
Stilk v Myrick (S&OR P 107)
Rule may be undergoing change
Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (S&OR p108)
A practical benefit is conferred
No duress
Followed in NSW
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration Must Be Sufficient (Cont)
Promise to perform an existing contractual
duty to a third party is sufficient consideration
Performance of a public duty is not sufficient
consideration
Collins v Godefroy (S&OR p110)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration Must Be Sufficient (Cont)
Illusory promises are not consideration
E.g. “in consideration of natural love and
affection”
Too uncertain to be enforced
Dunton v Dunton (S&OR p 106)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Consideration Must Be Sufficient
$1 for a Rolls Royce
“I promise to be an honest public servant”
“I’ll give up my legal claim against you”
“I will pay you less than I owe you if you
forget the rest”
“In love and affection”
“I promise to carry out my contractual
obligations”
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Fundamentals of Law
Capacity to Contract
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Contracts with Minors
Anyone under 18 years of age
Contracts with minors can be
Valid – legally enforceable
Voidable – legally enforceable until
repudiated by the minor
Void – no legal effect
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Contracts with Minors (Cont)
Valid contracts
Supply of necessaries
Contract for the supply of goods and services
that are suitable to the condition in life of the
minor and to his actual requirements at the time
of sale and delivery
Onus is one person seeking to enforce contract
against minor
Nash v Inman (S&OR p116)
Reasonable price not contract price
Beneficial contracts of service
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Contracts with Minors (Cont)
Benefical contracts of service
E.g. apprenticeships
Must be for the benefit of the minor
Ratification by Minor after turning 18
Contract becomes valid and enforceable
Statutory modification
NSW & SA
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Fundamentals of Law
Certainty
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Agreement Must be Certain
Must be sufficiently certain in all its essential
elements especially:
Subject matter
Price
Must not contain unclear, ambiguous or
contradictory terms
Courts will uphold contract where possible
Implying a reasonable price
Whitlock v Brew (S&OR p 89)
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Agreement Must be Certain (cont.)
Agreement to agree
Agreement to negotiate
Subject to contract
Subject to finance etc
THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Reminder
Exam next week
Australian Legal System
Week 1 material
Revision material from Week 2
Multiple choice
30 minutes
Closed book
Can use approved dictionary
No electronic devices