Transcript PERFORMANCE BASED ALLOCATION SYSTEM (PBAS)

PERFORMANCE BASED
ALLOCATION SYSTEM
(PBAS)
Project retreat
Ouaguadougou 4-5 nov.09
Mohamed Tounessi
1
Background of the evolving PBAS
System
•
•
•
•
IFAD’s Sixth Replenishment (2004-2007)
Enhance development effectiveness
Maximize impact of scarce resources on rural poverty
Focusing resources on the best opportunity for
accelerated and sustained rural poverty reduction
• PBAS: decision making tool, integrated into
Corporate management process
• PBAS:
– policy dialogue tool with Government
– link with COSOP and PSRP
2
PBAS Objective
 Ensure that countries that have created a
conducive national, sectoral and local
framework for sustainable rural poverty
reduction, receive ex-ante allocations of IFAD
resources in line with their demonstrated
ability to use such resources effectively.
3
Key PBAS Indicators
3 levels
• Country performance assessed at three levels:
• Level 1: Macro and Broad Framework, that
influence all growth and poverty reduction
process, including rural poverty reduction
• Level 2: Rural development sector framework
• Level 3: Portfolio Performance
4
Level 1:Indicators of Broad
Framework
Achievements
• IFAD’s mandate – Rural Poverty Reduction
• No competence to produce performance
assessment of the broad framework
• Analysis Sources: Country Policy and
Institutional Assessment (CPIA)
5
CPIA Criteria
4 key areas under screening
• 1. Economic Management
–
–
–
–
Management of inflation and macroeconomic Imbalances
Fiscal policy
Management of external debt
Management and sustainability of the Development
Programme (Governance)
• 2. Structural policies
–
–
–
–
Trade policy and foreign exchange regime
Financial stability
Banking sector efficiency
Competitive environment for private sector
6
–
–
–
–
–
–
3. Policies for Social Inclusion/ Equity
Gender
Equity of public resources use
Building up human resources
Social protection and labour
Monitoring and analysis of poverty outcomes and
impacts
7
4. Public Sector Management and
Institutions
– Property rights and rule-based governance
(Governance)
– Quality of budgetary and financial management
– Efficiency of revenue Mobilization (Governance)
– Quality of public administration (Governance)
– Transparency, accountability (Governance)
– Corruption in the public sector (Governance)
8
Indicators of Rural Sector Framework
(Level 2)
• Strategic framework 2008-2012 and rural policy
papers are IFAD’s indicators for sustainable rural
poverty reduction
• 5 key areas under screening
– 1. Strengthening the capacity of the rural poor and their
organizations
– 2. Improving equitable access to productive natural
resources and technology
– 3. Increasing access to financial services and markets
– 4. Promoting equitable gender relations
– 5. Improving governance relative to rural development
issues and activities
9
Sectoral Policy and Institutional
Assessment Scoring
Cluster
Indicator /sub indicator
A. Strengthening the capacity of the rural poor and organizations
(i)
Policy and legal framework for rural organizations
(ii)
Dialogue between government and rural organizations
B. Improving equitable access to productive natural resources and
technologies
(i)
Access to land
(ii)
Access to water for agriculture
(iii)
Access to agricultural research and extension services
C. Increasing access to financial services and market
(i)
Enabling conditions for rural financial services development
(ii)
Investment climate for rural business
(iii)
Access to agricultural input and produce markets
D. Gender issues
(i)
Access to education in rural areas
(ii)
Representation
E. Public resource management and accountability
(i)
Allocation and management of public resources for rural
development
(ii)
Accountability, transparency and corruption in rural areas
Score
10
Indicators Portfolio Performance
(Level 3)
• Individual Project Performance
• “Project at Risk” (P.A.R.) methodology
• “ Problem Project” not meet criteria for
Implementation Progress (I.P)
• And or Achievement of Development
Objectives (D.O.)
• IFAD Portfolio Review
• IFAD’s Project Status Report (P.S.R)
11
IFAD P.A.R. flag indicators
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
•
Loan effectiveness
Compliance with loan covenants
Project Management Performance
Availability of counterpart funds
compliance with procurement procedures
Quality and timeliness of audit
Disbursement rate
Performance of M & E System
Beneficiary participation
Responsiveness of service providers
Gender focus in implementation
Poverty focus in implementation
Rating guidelines by indicator from 1 to 4
(Annex 3 handout)
12