Transcript Document
Chromatin-guided interpretation
of variation in a disease cohort.
• Methylome variability associated w/specific chromatin states
–
–
–
–
Methylation patterns primarily driven by tissue of origin
Little inter-individual variability, in hemi-methylated probes
Strong and weak enhancers most variable across individuals
Bi-modal and multi-modal probes depleted for promoter regions
• Methylome variability strongly genotype driven
– 55,000 methyl-QTLs, including 85% of most-variable probes
– methylQTL signal much stronger than for eQTLs or chromatinQTLs
– Depleted for promoter regions, enriched for enhancer regions
• Methylation changes associated with Alzheimer’s disease.
– Global hypermethylation signature across 7000 top-ranked probes.
– Enriched for brain-specific enhancers, depleted for promoter regions
– Motif enrichments for brain regulators in AD-associated probes.
Genetic and epigenetic data in 750 Alzheimer’s patients/controls
Chromatin States
PC / Repressed
Low signal
Heterochromatin
Repetitive
Active Promoter
Inactive/poised promoter
Promoter Flanking
Active Enhancer
Weak enhancer
Weak gene bodies
Strong gene bodies
Bradley Bernstein
• ROS & MAP studies:
Patients join study
cognitively normal
in middle age.
Patients followed
for 10+ years with
cognitive
evaluations.
Brain samples
(Dorsolateral
prefrontal cortex,
DLPFC) donated
post-mortem.
750 individuals (~50% w/AD) • Integrate:
Genotypes
imputed with
1000Genomes
Project
AD Phenotypes
Methylation and
genotype (DeJager
Lab)
486,000
methylation
probes
Philip DeJager
Reference
chromatin map
(Bernstein Lab).
Methylome driven primarily by tissue of origin.
Consistent between individuals, technologies and
studies.
Correlation heatmap
DLPFC,
this study.
Mean R2 ≈ 0.99
CD4+, Rakyan et
al., 2010, 27k array
CD4+, this study
Probe Standard Deviation
Profile of methylome reveals little
variation.
Mean methylation signal
4
Each state has a unique methylation profile
Average
Methylation level
Inter-individual
Variance
Active TSS flanking
Inactive/poised promoter
Inactive/poised promoter
Strong promoter
Strong promoter
CNV/Rep
CNV/Rep
Heterochromatin
Heterochromatin
Low signal
Low signal
PC Repressed
PC Repressed
Methylation
Strong promoters – little methylation, little variance.
Strong gene bodies – high methylation.
Polycomb repressed areas – high variability.
Per−CpG Methylation Variance
0.004
Active TSS flanking
0.003
Active enhancer
Two
highest
0.002
Active enhancer
1.0
Weak enhancer
0.8
Weak enhancer
0.6
Weak transcribed/
active proximal
0.4
Weak transcribed/
active proximal
0.2
Strong transcription
0.0
Strong transcription
0.001
Strong gene bodies
Weak gene bodies
Weak enhancer
Active Enhancer
Promoter Flanking
Inactive/poised promoter
Active Promoter
Repetitive
Heterochromatin
Low signal
PC / Repressed
DNA methylation probe variance by chromatin state
0.000
DNA methylation by chromatin state
Chromatin-guided interpretation
of variation in a disease cohort.
• Methylome variability associated w/specific chromatin states
–
–
–
–
Methylation patterns primarily driven by tissue of origin
Little inter-individual variability, in hemi-methylated probes
Strong and weak enhancers most variable across individuals
Bi-modal and multi-modal probes depleted for promoter regions
• Methylome variability strongly genotype driven
– 55,000 methyl-QTLs, including 85% of most-variable probes
– methylQTL signal much stronger than for eQTLs or chromatinQTLs
– Depleted for promoter regions, enriched for enhancer regions
• Methylation changes associated with Alzheimer’s disease.
– Global hypermethylation signature across 7000 top-ranked probes.
– Enriched for brain-specific enhancers, depleted for promoter regions
– Motif enrichments for brain regulators in AD-associated probes.
Autosomal Probes (2831)
Discovering variable probes through devonvolution
Individuals
Correcting for covariates
Bij = Rij + x0 + x1(age) + x2(gender) + x3(study) + x4(batch)
Enriched in areas of
low regulatory activity
*
Strong transcription
* *
*
Weak transcribed/
active proximal
*
* *
Weak enhancer
* **
Active enhancer
0.1
Active TSS flanking
0.3
Inactive/poised promoter
Strong promoter
CNV/Rep
Heterochromatin
0.4
Low signal
PC Repressed
Multimodal probes -- distribution
All probes
Bimodal
Trimodal
Bimodal+Trimodal
***
0.2
Depleted in active
promoters
*
* *
0.0
Chromatin-guided interpretation
of variation in a disease cohort.
• Methylome variability associated w/specific chromatin states
–
–
–
–
Methylation patterns primarily driven by tissue of origin
Little inter-individual variability, in hemi-methylated probes
Strong and weak enhancers most variable across individuals
Bi-modal and multi-modal probes depleted for promoter regions
• Methylome variability strongly genotype driven
– 55,000 methyl-QTLs, including 85% of most-variable probes
– methylQTL signal much stronger than for eQTLs or chromatinQTLs
– Depleted for promoter regions, enriched for enhancer regions
• Methylation changes associated with Alzheimer’s disease.
– Global hypermethylation signature across 7000 top-ranked probes.
– Enriched for brain-specific enhancers, depleted for promoter regions
– Motif enrichments for brain regulators in AD-associated probes.
Most epigenomic variability is genotype-driven
P-value (-log10P)
Manhattan plot of 450,000 methylation probes
Chromosome and genomic position
• Cutoff of 10-14 (10-2 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction).
• Prune for probes disrupted by SNP.
140,000 CpGs associated with genotype at 1% FDR
55,000 at Bonferoni-corrected P-value of 10-2
From most variable 1% of CpGs: 85% are SNP associated.
11
*
0.05
*
Strong transcription
0.20
Weak transcribed/
active proximal
*
Weak enhancer
0.10
Active enhancer
*
Active TSS flanking
Inactive/poised promoter
Strong promoter
CNV/Rep
Heterochromatin
Low signal
0.15
PC Repressed
SNP-associated CpGs depleted in
promoters, enriched in enhaners
*
All probes
meQTL probes
*
*
*
0.00
12
Chromatin-guided interpretation
of variation in a disease cohort.
• Methylome variability associated w/specific chromatin states
–
–
–
–
Methylation patterns primarily driven by tissue of origin
Little inter-individual variability, in hemi-methylated probes
Strong and weak enhancers most variable across individuals
Bi-modal and multi-modal probes depleted for promoter regions
• Methylome variability strongly genotype driven
– 55,000 methyl-QTLs, including 85% of most-variable probes
– methylQTL signal much stronger than for eQTLs or chromatinQTLs
– Depleted for promoter regions, enriched for enhancer regions
• Methylation changes associated with Alzheimer’s disease.
– Global hypermethylation signature across 7000 top-ranked probes.
– Enriched for brain-specific enhancers, depleted for promoter regions
– Motif enrichments for brain regulators in AD-associated probes.
Global hyper-methylation in 1000s of AD-associated loci
P-value
QQ plot: Many loci with weak effects?
8
480,000 probes, ranked by Alzheimer’s association
6
4
Methylation
Observed (-logP)
10
Top 7000 probes
2
0
0
2
4
6
8
Expected (-logP)
10
Alzheimer’s-associated probes are hypermethylated
• Global effect across 1000s of probes
Alzheimer’s
Normal
– Rank all probes by Alzheimer’s association
– Observe functional changes down ranklist
– 7000 probes show shift in methylation
Complex disease: genome-wide effects
Hypermethylated probes
(repressed)
Estimating functionally enriched Alzheimer’s probes
0.00
PC Repressed 44109
Low signal 98450
Heterochromatin 2980
CNV/Rep 902
Strong promoter 109360
Inactive/poised promoter 46041
Active TSS flanking 25106
Active enhancer 14365
Weak enhancer 32342
Weak transcribed/low signal proximal to active regions 65825
Strong transcription 31433
−0.05
(Obs − Exp) / Total
0.05
Strong enhancers / TSS flanking regions
Heterochromatin
0
100000
200000
Probe Rank
300000
400000
Alzheimer’s prediction vs. likely biological pathways
NRSF
All probes, ranked by AD assoc. P-value
ELK1
All probes, ranked by AD assoc. P-value
CTCF
Predictive power: 7k probes + APOE
Regulatory motifs associated
with Alzheimer-associated probes
suggest potential pathways
We have not solved Alzheimer’s, but new insights gained
Chromatin basis of methylation variation in disease
• Methylome variability associated w/specific chromatin states
–
–
–
–
Methylation patterns primarily driven by tissue of origin
Little inter-individual variability, in hemi-methylated probes
Strong and weak enhancers most variable across individuals
Bi-modal and multi-modal probes depleted for promoter regions
• Methylome variability strongly genotype driven
– 55,000 methyl-QTLs, including 85% of most-variable probes
– methylQTL signal much stronger than for eQTLs or chromatinQTLs
– Depleted for promoter regions, enriched for enhancer regions
• Methylation changes associated with Alzheimer’s disease.
– Global hypermethylation signature across 7000 top-ranked probes.
– Enriched for brain-specific enhancers, depleted for promoter regions
– Motif enrichments for brain regulators in AD-associated probes.
Reference epigenome maps: context for natural variation, disease
Enhancers: most variable, genotype-driven, disease-associated
Systems view of complex disease: 1000s of variants, weak effects
Opportunity: Interplay between genotype, epigenome, disease
Acknowledgements
• Kellis group:
–
–
–
–
Manolis Kellis
Pouya Kheradpour
Luke Ward
Gerald Quon
• UCLA:
– Jason Ernst
• De Jager group:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Gyan Srivastava
Lori Chibnik
Brendan Keenan
Phil De Jager
Joshua Shulman
Cristin Aubin
Towfique Raj
• Rush University:
– David Bennett