Transcript Slide 1

In conclusion, there are 3 scenarios that may lead to Polygyny: (1) Females have no other choice but to mate with a mated male (2) Females may be deceived (3) Males control access to resources, but also Females may actively assess the consequences of their decisions and make an adaptive choice ....let

’ s examine this relationship between resources and females more closely in mammals....

Understanding variation in Mammalian mating systems is best understood in terms of what leads to a high or low POLYGYNY potential E.g., Female reproductive success is limited by access to resources, thus the distribution of females depends on

resource dispersion

(1) If females are

clumped

in space or

predictable

in time there is a higher POLYGYNY potential than if not clumped or predictable (2) If males can

defend

a territory or access to females either directly or indirectly via competition for resource rich sites there is a higher POLYGYNY potential than if defense is not possible

A Comparative Survey of Mating Systems in Mammals

Even distribution of resources, little polygamy potential Patchy distribution of resources, high polygamy potential

Females solitary and range defensible by males : In 60% of mammalian species the female is solitary and the male defends a territory that overlaps one or more female ranges - If female ranges are small relative to the area a male can defend – polygyny - If female ................ large ............................................................ - monogamy In the latter, usually the male deserts after mating, but in ~3% they stay to give parental care.

Marmosets carry young African wild dogs – coop. hunting, feeding Klipspringer - defense

Females solitary and range

not

defensible by males: Temporary, and wandering, association during estrus - monogamous

Orangutan Moose

Females

social

and range defensible by males: Can lead to permanent harem attached to male ’ s territory Several males (often relatives) may defend larger groups more successfully and increase length of tenure of a harem Colobus monkeys Hanuman langurs

Females social, range

not

defensible, but Female movements are predictable: Males defend small ranges and

wait

for females to pass through on the way to predictable routes...

...on the way to the waterhole...

...or to rich feeding grounds

Females social, range

not

Female movements

not

defensible, predictable Males

follow

females Elephants – small female groups

Seasonal Harems Seasonal estrus (predictability in time) – allows males to build up energy reserves for mating season and aggressively defend harems for the one month females are fertile. Permanent Harems when females do not all come into estrus at the same time ( unpredictability ) –

Summary: in mammals, mating systems are determined from the complex relationships between female range size, movement, sociality, predictability in time and space, and the male ’ s ability to defend a range solitary defensible range small: Mono large: Polygyny social Polygyny (harems) non-defensible Monogamy Polygyny of various sorts (including harems) depending on predictability of female movement and estrus

= 5.0

= 5.0

♀  ♀

β

= 3.8

= 3.8

= 7.6

Lastly, multiple mating systems can occur within a single species, sometimes driven by environmental circumstances ♀

= 6.7

♂ 

= 3.7

β

= 3.0