Transcript Slide 1
Double beta decay
Ruben Saakyan
UCL
25 March 2004
Outline
Motivation
bb status
Situation in the UK
Future projects and UK
involvement
Sensitivity and time scale
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
2
Neutrino mass.
What do we want to know?
e
1
Ue12
2
3
Ue22
Ue32
Mixing
normal
~0.01 eV
25/03/2004
inverted
~0.05 eV
( Dirac)
oscillations
OR
(Majorana)
Superbeams
-factories
degenerate
0bb only
preferred by theorists
•
•
•
•
Hierarchy (-osc and 0bb)
CP-violation (-osc, 0bb+3H)
Relative mass scale (-osc)
Absolute mass scale
(0bb+3H+cosmology)
> 0.1 eV
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
3
Double beta decay
2bb
1
T1/02 (0 0 ) G 0 ( E0 , Z ) M
m
2
2
N
U mi
2
ei
i
N
0 2
m 2
i
U
e
ei mi
2
Main candidates:
48Ca,76Ge,82Se,
100Mo,136Xe,116Cd,
130Te,150Nd
0bb
2
i
~2-3 MeV
Neutrino nature (Dirac vs Majorana)
Absolute neutrino mass scale.
Possible sensitivity ~0.01 eV (3H – 0.2 eV, KATRIN)
IF degenerate hierarchy, we can measure “everything”
The Experimental Problem
( Maximize Rate/Minimize Background)
Natural Activity:
t(238U, 232Th) ~ 1010 years
Target: t(0bb) > 1024 years
Detector
Shielding
Cryostat, or other experimental support
Front End Electronics
Cosmic ray induced activity
Low-energy, ultralow-background eperiment.
Overlap in experimental techniques with dark matter, solar ’s
UK expertise exists
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
5
Where are we now?
<m> < 0.35 – 0.9 eV
mscale ~ 0.05 eV
mass scale from
oscillation experiments
normal
~0.01eV
inverted
~0.05eV
degenerate
>0.1eV
(S. King et al.
hep-ph/0402121)
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
6
Heidelberg-Moscow experiment
claim (end 2001)
<m> = 0.4 eV ???
2.5-3 s
bb community immediate response:
Claim is at least premature
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
7
Heidelberg claim.
Recent developments
unknown
hep-ph/0403018. Data acquisition and analysis of the
76Ge double beta experiment in Gran Sasso 1990-2003
accepted for publication in NIM A
• Data reanalyzed with improved
214Bi
214Bi
binning/summing
0bb
• Peak visible
• Effect reclaimed with 4.2s
• <m> = (0.2 – 0.6) eV, 0.4 eV best fit
<m> = (0.1 – 0.9) eV (due to NME)
Problems (my view)
71.7 kgyr
25/03/2004
• Looks more like 2.5s of effect
• Unknown peak at 2030 keV?
• 214Bi line intensities do not match
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
8
Situation in the UK
At least 4 bb experts in UK (3
academics, 1 postdoc)
UCL in NEMO – one of two
experiments currently taking data
Sussex, Warwick – COBRA, new
approach R&D
Meeting at RAL, Sep 2003 – Interest
bb decay group > 40 people from
particle and nuclear communities
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
9
Situation in the UK
bb steering group: Sacha Davidson,
Brian Fulton, Sean Paling, Ruben
Saakyan, James Stirling (chair), Kai
Zuber
IPPP workshop 21-23 April. Think
about tackling NME problem
bb strategy for UK suggested by
steering group
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
10
Where to go from here to reach
10-50 meV?
A Great Number of Proposals
UK steering group suggested roadmap
CAMEO
Cd-116
1 t CdWO4 crystals
DCBA
Nd-150
20 kg Nd layers between tracking chambers
SuperNEMO
Se-82, Various
100 kg of Se-82(or other) foil
COBRA
Te-130,Cd-116
CdTe semiconductors
CANDLES
Ca-48
Several tons CaF2 crystals in liquid scint.
CUORE
Te-130
750 kg TeO2 bolometers
EXO
Xe-136
1 ton Xe TPC (gas or liquid)
GEM
Ge-76
1 ton Ge diodes in liquid nitrogen
GENIUS
Ge-76
1 ton Ge diodes in liquid nitrogen
GSO
Gd-160
2 t Gd2SiO5:Ce crystal scint. in liquid scint.
Majorana
Ge-76
500 kg Ge diodes
MOON
Mo-100
Mo sheets between plastic scint., or liq. scint.
Xe
Xe-136
1.56 t of Xe in liq. Scint.
XMASS
Xe-136
10 t of liquid Xe
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
11
Future experiments expected to start in 2008/10
(5 yr exposure)
Experiment, Source and
cost
Mass
estimate
Sensitivity
to
T1/2 (y)
Sensitivity
to
<m> (eV)*
Majorana
$50M
76Ge,
500kg 3×1027
0.03 – 0.07
CUORE
$30M
130Te,
2×1026
0.04 – 0.17
EXO
$50M-100M
136Xe
8×1026
0.05 – 0.12
SuperNEMO
$30M
82Se(or other)
2×1026
0.04 – 0.11
*
750kg(nat)
1 ton
100 kg
5 different latest NME calculations
SuperNEMO
NEMO-III
(25 G)
3m
B
COBRA
CdTe, CdZnTe
Criteria for choosing projects
• Competitiveness
• UK role
• Complementarity
Suggested Future UK programme
Two steps: SuperNEMO and COBRA
SuperNEMO
Quick start due to >15 yr of R&D experience; 40-50
meV by ~2014, likely to be first; if observed,
disentangle mechanism of 0bb decay
UK one of the main proponents; suggested to host in
Boulby mine
COBRA
Novel approach; potential for large masses;
possibility 10-20 meV by ~2020-2025; possibility to
disentangle 0bb mechanism
Idea of Kai Zuber (Sussex)
Highly complementary!
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
14
Summary
0bb decay is indispensable for solving
neutrino mass puzzle
Great interest in particle and nuclear
physics community. Highly
complimentary to existing UK neutrino
programme
An opportunity for UK to lead 0bb
research
We may be not far away from the
effect…
25/03/2004
Ruben Saakyan, UCL
PPAP meeting at RHUL
15