Building Civic Capacity, Engagement, and Action

Download Report

Transcript Building Civic Capacity, Engagement, and Action

Community Participation, Civic Capacity & Neighborhood Identity

Findings from Focus Groups and Written Elicitations April 3, 2008 Commissioned by The Center for Health Equity, Louisville Metro Department of Public Health & Wellness

PURPOSE OF COMMISSION

• A social marketing campaign • Increase the community participation of west Louisville residents by …………..

• Reducing the barriers and, • Highlighting the benefits according to • The specific needs, values, beliefs, practices and interests of the residents.

Investigative Framework

1. To improve health and reduce health inequities requires changes in public policy and the arrangements in society that support inequality.

2. If residents of the City [State, Nation] understand and support policy goals, change and progress are more likely.

3. To change policies and societal arrangements that support inequality communities must have the capacity to engage civically.

4. We currently have group differences in the civic capacity of some communities and sectors, i.e., corporations, high income vs. low income communities, etc. 5. How do we rectify imbalances in civic participation and civic power?

Civic Engagement

   

Participation

 Formal and informal   Social and Political Organized community life

The capacity of people to organize in ways that bring about dialogue with and/or challenge a system.

May include individual or group acts

 Attending public meetings    Writing a letter to the paper or government official Signing a petition, etc.

Voting

Civic engagement and participation

 Confront & organize to address community issues  Lead to the ultimate goal of community practices for social justice.

Civic Capacity Building

 

Training, education, resource identification and resource building, organizational and personal development

Strengthens the ability of community organizations and groups

Build their knowledge, structures, systems, people and skills so they are better able to define and achieve their objectives Promotes sustainability and strengthens internal and external or bridging and linking social capital

Goals Civic Engagement

Mobilize residents to become civically engaged

• Identify issues • Examine issues • Ask questions • Organize • Take action • Be responsible for what they can control

MEASURING CIVIC CAPACITY

• • • •

Political Efficacy Social Cohesion Social Capital Collective Self Efficacy

How Does this Affect Health?

Policies that Reduce Availability of Affordable Quality Housing

Government Policies

Policies that Reduce Availability of Financial Resources Direct Material Effects of Poor Quality Housing Stress Associated With Income and Housing Insecurity Direct Material Effects of Income Health Status: Increased Morbidity and Mortality

Strategy and Research

• Part One –

Exploring current “landscape” of public understanding (focus groups, written elicitations)

• Part Two –

Message development - explanations in particular) (new “lenses” on the issue

Message testing - evaluating effectiveness (online, and in-person

Research Questions

• How do Louisvillians currently think about community participation?

• What role does neighborhood identity play? • What are the key obstacles to increasing participation?

• Are there promising directions for moving forward?

Methods

• Focus groups –

Recorded, transcribed

• Written elicitations • Looking for shared thinking patterns, e.g.: – – – –

Links between topics Topics that aren’t thought about Ideas that seem important Differences between how we want people to think and what they think

• Louisville residents • Non-experts, non-activists • 13 women and 7 men • 9 conservative, 10 liberal, 1 moderate • 12 White, 6 Black, 1 Hisp, 1 Nat.Am. • Mix of ages, educational backgrounds • From lifetime residents to newcomers

Subjects

FORMAT & SUBJECTS

• • •

Focus groups

– Six groups – 2 hours – Incentive $50 – Videotaped, audio taped, transcript

Pre-Screened Focus Group questionnaire

• • • • • •

Homeowners Low Income N.E. Christian Portland St. Stephen’s Youth 18-24 8 7 6 5 6 3

Ages

18-24 three

30-50 fourteen

> 50 eighteen

Gender

Female 19

Male 16

SUBJECTS

• •

Home ownership

Own 19

Homeless 1

– –

Rent Unknown 13 2 Race

African American 25

White 9

Hispanic 1

Education Levels

– College graduate 6 – Graduate degree 5 – High school 15 – Professional degree 1 – Some college 6 – Unknown 2

SUBJECTS

• • • • • • • •

Income > $75 $50-75 $35-50 $10-15 $15-20 $20-25 $25-35 3 4 6 2 2 4 6

• • • • •

GROUPS

1 group of young adults

– Ages 18-24 African American

1 group from Northeast Christian

– Adults

1 group from St. Stephen’s

– Adults

1 group of adults from Portland

– White

2 groups of adults from W. Louisville

– African American – Low income – Middle income

Expert View: External Factors

External Factors Health Outcomes

Social determinants

play a key role in determining health.

Expert View: External Factors

External Factors

Housing Economic opportunity Education Work status …

Health Outcomes

Diabetes Cancer Blood pressure Obesity …

Social determinants

play a key role in determining health.

Actual

Interpretation: Right Choices

CHOICES Character, Knowledge, Culture, Priorities, Values

Healthier

GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C

Less Healthy

Public assumes a

different causal story

: RIGHT CHOICES

Actual

Interpretation: Right Choices

CHOICES HEALTH OUTCOMES A “User-friendly” Conceptual Model:

simple

, easy to understand – seems like the whole story A Moral Model: Not just how things do work, but how they

should

work – outcomes seem

fair

A Limiting, Distorting Lens

HEALTH OUTCOMES

Q: Some people say the city of Louisville should do more to close the gap between those who are in good health and those in ill health. What do you think?

A: I think people need to eat better, exercise more, I think that ’ s a big issue here in Kentucky. The way we live. The way we eat. The way we don ’ t exercise, a lot of it is [contributing] to being overweight.

Conservative African-American woman, age 64

A Limiting, Distorting Lens

HEALTH OUTCOMES

[You] need to choose a different outlook and then from that different outlook that will perhaps guide you towards a healthier life ... If people understood they actually do have some amount of power – some amount of control in their lives, then that would be a healthier place to start – a healthier viewpoint.

Liberal white man, age 31 Note: Choices matter, but they’re

not the whole story

.

A Limiting, Distorting Lens

HEALTH OUTCOMES

Q: If you had to take a guess on what groups of people in Louisville would be healthier and what groups would be less healthy, what do you think?

A: The couch potatoes would be less healthy.

Conservative white woman, age 71

A Limiting, Distorting Lens

HEALTH OUTCOMES

Blacks don ’ t take care of themselves right. That ’ s why there ’ s more health problems with Blacks than Whites, because they just don ’ t take care of themselves right. They don ’ t eat right. They don ’ t exercise. They don ’ t go to the doctor like they should. That ’ s the problem with Blacks.

Conservative African-American woman, age 44

A Limiting, Distorting Lens

HEALTH OUTCOMES

Eating habits is one of the biggest things that ’ s causing most of the diabetes and stuff like that, because unfortunately the Black race has a rich diet. It ’ s got a bunch of grease in it and that ’ s causing cholesterol and all those stuff. Once we get educated on it we will be able to do better.

Conservative African-American man, age 60

A Limiting, Distorting Lens

HEALTH OUTCOMES

I think it has a lot to do with [African-American] culture. I ’ m being stereotypical, but based on what I know, they are OK with the bodies that they have. Some Black people have great bodies. Other Black people are bigger … but they ’ re okay with themselves, and I think White people have a harder image of what they need to live up to. There ’ s more of a pressure on White people, because we ’ re the dominant race.

Liberal White woman, age 22

A Moral Lens

Q: Do you think we as a society owe every person some kind of help for being healthy? Is something like that a right to have?

A: No. Not as a society, because see a lot of times people cause their health problems by the way they live.

Conservative African-American man, age 60

It ’ s your own personal responsibility to do what you can to improve your health and keep yourself healthy ... If I ’ m going out, [if] I smoke a lot, if I ’ m carrying on excess weight or if I have four or five alcoholic drinks every day – I ’ m making that decision. That ’ s my choice, so I hurting myself. I think there ’ s too much of people not taking ’ m responsibility for their actions and just letting it go and thinking, well, you know, let somebody else take care of me.

Moderate White woman, age 75

Response to Causal Claims

External Factors

Housing Economic opportunity Education Work status …

Health Outcomes

Diabetes Cancer Blood pressure Obesity …

Response to Causal Claims

External Factors

Housing Economic opportunity Education Work status …

Health Outcomes

Diabetes Cancer Blood pressure Obesity … • External factors as

outcomes

, not causes poverty, racial isolation) (people create their own

A lot of discrimination is self-imposed ... [Blacks] get 25 years old and they don’t have an education, they don’t know how to speak properly. Mainstream isn’t going to take them in, because they’re not mainstream.

Conservative White man, age 29

Response to Causal Claims

External Factors

Housing Economic opportunity Education Work status …

Health Outcomes

Diabetes Cancer Blood pressure Obesity … • External factors as

obstacles that should be overcome

examples of people doing fine) (many

You can still make a way if you try. I’ve seen people do it . . . It’s all based on your choices.

Liberal White woman, age 30

RIGHT CHOICES Summary

• •

Comfort

with disparities

Resistance

to Causal Claims • Right Choices as a powerful lens

with no real competition

Where “Right Choices” Comes From

• Natural tendency to think “Little Picture” • American emphasis on Individualism, Personal Responsibility (to

exclusion

of other views) • Reinforcement in the media

“Right Choices” in the News

• Media “tells the story” through choice of stories, language, images, etc • Right Choices as a natural reading,

even when it’s not stated directly

Troutman, who is nationally known for his work fighting racial health disparities, said there are complex factors behind the problem such as poverty, access problems and discrimination. Jesse Penick, a 41-year-old African American getting a checkup at the Portland clinic this week . . . cannot resist eating such foods as pork chops and fried chicken. "It's kind of hard to eat right," he said.

Courier-Journal,

12/24/05

Opportunities

This report has so far focused on the “bad news.” The research also suggested very promising ways of moving forward.

Opportunities

Approaches with the potential to bring about a shift in thinking • Health gradient – – –

It’s about

everyone

avoids traps about groups Potentially a

clear and concrete

A totally

new idea

idea potential for “aha!” effect?

• Very clear causal stories –

i.e. that can “

compete

” with Right Choices

Opportunities

• Frame social determinants as Opportunities for health • Convey a “Positive Vision” –

Clear, practical image of interventions that can succeed

Opportunities

• Familiar case studies –

where it’s

impossible to pin blame on individuals

E.g. lack of green space? lack of full service grocery stores? Rubbertown?

Recommendations So Far

• Ask the following question about

every communication:

Does it allow people to focus on individual choices/behaviors?

• Don’t bother focusing on disparities per se.

• Talk about practical and effective changes/interventions

Recommendations So Far

• Make

causal stories

possible as concrete and irresistible as

[email protected]

www.cullturallogic.com

Building Civic Capacity, Engagement, and Action

What are We Dealing With?

• •

Many of the inequalities in health- are due to inequalities in the social conditions in which people live and work.

– Valentine, et. al, PloS Medicine 2006; 3(6): e106. TH commission on the Social Determinants of Health

Tackling these conditions- social determinants health- underlying causes of poor health can contribute to improving health and health equity.

Central Questions?

• • • •

Why are you civically active?

Why are you not civically active?

What is your view of west Louisville?

What issues concern you?

– Parameters for this discussion • Local economy • Neighborhoods • Your family • Jobs, wages • Educational opportunities

What Ideas or Theories Do We Want To Explore?

What are their views of West Louisville?

What Issues concern them?

Why do they participate or not participate ?

Why Do Individuals Elect Not To Participate?

  

Because They Can’t……

Legal restrictions

• Intimidation, fear, road blocks –

System makes participation/voting difficult

• Internalized powerlessness or racism

Because They Don’t Want to…

– Will this do any good?

• Is this effective in achieving economic or non-economic benefits? • Self-interest • Is there a perceived benefit?

– Can I trust the people in power?

– Attitude influences participation

Because Nobody Asked

– Mobilization Theory- participation is based on contextual cues and political opportunities in the environment of the individual- media messages, campaign spending, conversations with friends/neighbors, etc. – Participation influences political attitude, efficacy, and sophistication – Mobilization mediates the effects of SES and attitudes on participation.

– Mobilization accounts for approximately half of the decline in voter turnout since 1960.

Sidney Verba, Kay L. Schlozman, Henry Brady and Norman Nie, “Resources and Political Participation,” paper prepared for the 1991 annual meetings of the American Political Science Association

Expected Outcomes

A report:

 How people in west Louisville think about civic participation [

in comparison to…..

]  A look at the issues that concern them  How they think about west Louisville  Recommended messages and activities  Preliminary ideas for a communication strategy  Preliminary ideas for evaluation  Be prepared to grow, change, and make midcourse corrections based on our observations.

• • •

Recruitment How & Who?

1 group of young adults

– Ages 18-24 African American

1 group of adults from Portland

– White

2 groups of adults from W. Louisville

– African American – Low income – Middle income

Deliberation

• An exchange of views – What is my position and experience on this?

• Jointly digesting and reflecting on information, facts • Dialogue – Reflect on common good – Offer reasons why others should change their minds • May be unable to find a common position • Only if worldviews are incompatible • And reasonable

THEORY

Old Theory SES Model Attitudes Behavior Resources-time, money, skills Political Action New Theory and Ideas Mobilization Model •The quality and type of participation affects another kind of participation •SES still affects action & behaviors but we now know that ….

Participation Mobilization Political Attitudes & Efficacy •Mobilization mediates the effects of SES and attitudes on participation.

•Mobilization accounts for approximately half of the decline in voter turnout since 1960.

THEORY (cont’d)

Participation

Deliberative Discussions Civic Engagement Agency A Voice

Both externally and internally driven

Attitudes, resources – time, money skills- mobilization, informal political discussion, etc.

Not simply voting

–consider context, kinds of actions, over what period of time and constraints….may be organizing, mobilizing for collective action… Leighley, J. Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 1 Mar. 1995, 181-209.

Building Civic Capacity

   Teach and demonstrate the importance of democratic practices at the community level Premise: people--citizens of their own communities, can and must be the driving force and the principal agents of change for social justice and democratic practices Method: – Format: Issue-driven – Basis: Social change discourse & deliberation – Community Dialogues- meetings, selected readings, deliberation, critical thinking, scenario driven role-playing  Evaluation- longitudinal, data-driven, with a control group [maybe] to measure social change practices, actions, and participation

Civic Capacity Building

   

Community competence

– Confront its own problems

Strengthens the ability of community organizations and groups

– Build their knowledge, structures, systems, people and skills so they are better able to define and achieve their objectives

Training, education, resource identification and resource building, organizational and personal development Promotes sustainability and strengthens social capital

Social Capital As a Process Towards Community Practice

  

Connections among individuals, other communities, the government

– Intercommunity – Intra-community – structural – cognitive

One person may possess social capital but it doesn’t take place unless there is more than one person.

Channels of communication with a large number of people both inside and outside a community.

Connect the Dots Down Stream-

-------------------------

Up Stream

A Message Diabetes Obesity Lung Cancer Infant Mortality Behavioral Risk Factors Lifestyle Do We Care About What They Care About?

Relationships Public Policy Process Self-Interests Structural Change

Rational Public Policy Process

 Problem Identification  Gain Agenda Status  Policy Formulation, adoption, funding  Policy Implementation  Policy Evaluation Adjustment, Termination

Goals, Objectives & Theory

 To increase civic engagement – collective action and mobilization- at the community level through the use of dialogue, deliberation, and action.

• Redefine the factors that determine civic participation- attitudes, SES.

• Broaden the outcomes of civic engagement beyond simply voting.

• Motivate citizens to engage in dialogue, group will-making and collective action resulting in social change.