Transcript Vernant
For Vernant, mind can at no time be separated from its society; every mental fact is also and always a social fact (and the inverse), and its presence is discernible in the multiple and multi-dimensional workings of that society. ' 'Whether it is a question of religious facts: myths, rituals, and figural representations-or of philosophy, science, art, social institutions, technical or economic facts, we always consider them as works created by men, as an expression of an organized mental activity." The institution of marriage is an excellent case in point. It can be studied historically as the changing customs of a social institution and also as a subject for mythological analysis, without any divorce between the two on grounds of incompatibility. In this emphasis on the formal structures and codes underlying the surface of the mythic narrative, myth assumes a function and meaning as a provisional problem-solving device; it is a kind of' 'logical tool" that each time aims to find some middle term to mediate "between contradictionsthat, in life, are actually insoluble." Refusing to accept the idea of' , a scattered and heterogeneous pantheon, a mythology of bits and pieces," he asks: "If this was the polytheism of the Greeks, how could these men, whose exacting rigor in the realms of intellectual consistency is extolled, have lived their religious life in a kind of chaos?" All the general trends and habits enumerated above can be found, I think, in the cultural tradition of The Other that serves as the fundamental and enduring model: the emphasis on mind from the noos of the Odyssey to Anaxagoras's deified Nous to Platonic and Aristotelian notions of intellection, the demand for reason and intelligibility, the gift for theory and formal categories of thought, the preoccupation with the analysis of society and social norms, endlessly debated, and the curiosity about human nature and what is often sentimentally called “the human condition.” …the paradox of gods who are endowed with bodies and yet are beyond corporeal limitations. They may eat but have no need of food, sleep but yet their eyes are open, and a blood courses through them that is not blood. In a face-to-face society, a culture of shame and honor where competition for glory leaves little room for the sense of duty and does not know that of sin, everyone's existence is continually placed under the regard of someone else. It is in the eyes of the one who faces you, in the mirror it presents you that the image of the self is constructed. There is no consciousness of one's identity without this other who, in facing you, reflects you and yet is opposed to you. Self and other, identity and alterity go together, are reciprocally constructed. Three ‘Others’ stand out. ..as particularly significant: the figure of the gods, the face of death and the visage of the beloved. Because they mark the frontiers within which the human individual is inscribed, because they emphasize one's own limitations and yet, by the intensity of emotions they arouse, also awaken the desire to overcome them, these three types of encounter with the other serve as touchstones for the testing of identity as the Greeks understood and adopted it. In making the goddess of the margins into a power of integration and assimilation, as when they take Dionysos, who incarnates the figure of the Other in the Greek pantheon, and install him at the center of the social system, right out front in the theater, the Greeks pass on an important lesson. They invite us, not to become polytheists, to believe in Artemis and Dionysos, but to construe the idea of civi lization as giving each his or her place. They invite us to an attitude of mind that not only has moral and political value, but that is properly intellectual and is called tolerance. “ [quote is from V himself] Six speeches, of which 2 are especially important. Phaedrus the rhetorician Pausanias the lawyer Eryximachus the doctor Aristophanes the comedian Agathon the dunce Socrates the philosopher Alcibiades [who’s been drinking…]