Transcript Aucun titre de diapositive

EUROHEAT & POWER
CLIMESPACE PRESENTATION
Cooling – The New Market
Dimension
 Paris District Cooling Network
Cooling – The New Market
Dimension

Contents :



Growing demand of cooling in Europe
Paris Cooling Network
Advantages and Environemental impact
Growing Demand in Europe


Market share of district cooling in Europe is between
2 to 3 TWh cooling
DC should be able to take 25 % share of market,
which can be between 500 and 700 TWh in 2012
 Why Such an interest ?
 The case of Paris
Company

Concessionaire for Paris City since 1991

Turnover in 2003 : 37 M€

Turnover in 2004 : 43 M€

Turnover in 2005 : 50 M€

Groupe SUEZ
CPCU
22%
Groupe GdF
Cofathec
50%
Shareholders :

Cofathec : 50 %

Elyo :
28 %

CPCU :
22 %

Investments since 1991 : 273 M€

Staff : 76 people.
Elyo
28%
Cofathec
Elyo
CPCU
Network



Power : 8 MW
Cooling Tower


Under construction : 52 MW
Industrial chillers
Free cooling
River Cooling



Power : 52 MW
Industrial chillers
River Cooling 


Power : 33 MW
Industrial chillers
Including 20 MWh for ice storage
Cooling Tower




Capacity : 12 000 m3
Equivalent installed power : 10 MW
Power : 42 MW
Indusrtial chillers
Ice Storage under
construction
Cooling Tower



Power : 33 MW
Industrial chillers
River Cooling
Connected power
MW
{275 MW
260
235
210
185
160
135
110
85
60
35
10
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Years
Environnemental Comparison between
Paris Network and Conventional cooling
Climespace
- 5 Sites
- 1 Network
- 400 Clients
Conventional Cooling
- 400 conventional Chillers
 Studies asked to an independant university specialized in cooling
solution (Armines)
 Comparison :
Global Nuisances :
Local Nuisances :
Electric consumption
Frigorific gases impact
Water
Chemical Product
Sanitary Risk
Noise
Visual Impact
Architecture constraint
Space saving
Comparison Between Climespace Network
and owned conditionning system

Method :

Analyze of Climespace Network performance





Electricity cnsumption
Energy sold
Frigorific gases leakage
Analyze of Climespace Client profile and Consumption
Comparison :


ARMINES took figures of conventional chillers per client profile
ARMINES made a model changing all our client putting adapted
conventional chillers, corresponding to their consumption profile
g.
or
rs
100
nc
n.
ct
.
Fi
pe
ve
di
te
t
en
m
ix
.
x
s
te
l
m
ge
s.
s
lo
au
t
co
m
re
an
ur
ho
bu
re
st
a
Nbre de clients .
Clients per activity
120
P<50kW
50<P<200
200<P<700
P>700 kW
80
60
40
20
0
Total Equivalent Warming Impact

This index determines CO2 impact, taking into
account:


Direct effect: frigorific gases leakage (measure for
CLIMESPACE, and estimation for conventional chillers)
Indirect effect: Electricity consumption (Climespace
consumption / performance data for conventional
chillers)
Water and chemical products
Consumption

Water consumed by Climespace /
consumption estimated for autonomous
chillers with cooling tower
Global Environnemental Impact
Electrical Consumption
Frigorific Gas Impact
TEWI (Total Equivalent Warming impact)
- 20%
- 30%
-30%
Water Consumption
- 55 %
Chimical Product
- 80%
Global
Nuisances
Local Environnemental Impact
Sanitary Risk
Noise reduction
Visual Impact
Architectural Impact
Space Saving
Local Nuisances
local impact
local impact