Transcript Slide 1
Glyn Bissix Knowledge and Adherence to Minimal-impact Techniques on the Cape Split Trail. Rive, K.; Bissix, G. & Kruisselbrink, D. (In Press) Identifying Key Messages to Encourage Minimal Impact on the Cape Split Trail. Liesure/Loisir: The Journal of the Canadian Association of Leisure Research. Volume 33 (2009), No. 2. Purpose The Location Theoretical Framework The Methodology The Results Conclusions Future Research Acknowledgements: The authors are indebted to Jeffrey Marion and Melissa Daniels of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University for permission to use the Leave No Trace questionnaire developed by them and for Dr. Marion’s continued assistance throughout the study. This study’s general purpose was to provide resource managers guidance in developing indirect management strategies for the Cape Split Trail and trail systems like it, and suggest additional direction for future research. This study identified the present level of Leave No Trace (LNT) knowledge of users and potential users of the Cape Split Trail in Nova Scotia, Canada It also assessed respondents’ environmental ethic and their corresponding self-reported behavior when engaged in recreation on the trail. Nova Scotia Canada Cape Split It provides a useful context for this study as it has experienced extensive (unmanaged) recreational impact over several decades It is currently a provincial park reserve; it has an extensively used trail situated within “1200 acres (405 hectares) of the Blomidon Peninsula”, located at the easterly tip of North Mountain, Nova Scotia Visitors seek its unique combination of biological and geological features as well as its isolation. The terrain is diverse, from steep basalt cliffs to flowered meadows and sheltered streams hosting a diverse range of species. Situated adjacent to the highest tides in the world where the Bay of Fundy meets the Minas Basin. Full provincial park designation, while likely providing more active management, is also likely to create even greater demand and amplify the need to address ecological impacts. Minimal impact knowledge levels, user behaviour and severity of impact is interreliant. The deficiency of one factor, such as minimal impact knowledge levels substantially affects other factors such as appropriate user behaviour and impact severity. The Little Split The need for understanding the efficacy of minimal impact educational campaigns is supported by 1) the continued demand for high quality outdoor recreation spaces that positively impact quality of life, 2) the need to better understand the relationship between outdoor recreation user knowledge and their ecological impacts, and 3) the requirement for a cost effective management approach to protect backcountry recreation spaces. The LNT program acknowledges the impact of outdoor recreation on the ecological community (soils, vegetation, water, wildlife and people) and prescribes strategies to significantly reduce these impacts. Its theoretical proposition: If you have the following knowledge you will minimize ecological and social impact. The seven principles are: Plan ahead and prepare Camp and travel on durable surfaces Pack it in, pack it out Properly dispose of what you cannot pack out Leave what you find Minimize use and impact of fires Respect wildlife and others. Respondents represented either current or potential users of the Cape Split Trail. Five groups from three distinct populations were sampled; users of the Cape Split Trail; members of a nature appreciation society--the Blomidon Naturalists Society; and three undergraduate classes drawn from Recreation Management, Biology and Interdisciplinary Studies at the same university. Other than the trailhead group, all respondents were selected through purposive sampling based on convenient access to appropriate populations. Substantially based on a question bank developed by Marion and Daniels (2001) Previously validated and tested by LNT staff, advocates, and agency partners (Daniels, 2004) Knowledge-based questions that gave useful insights into attitudes, beliefs and behavior (Weisburg, H., Krosnick, J. & Bowen, B., 1989), and also provided links between knowledge and corresponding actions The resulting set of questions were screened and validated through a two stage process by a panel of local experts; the second stage involved a modified Delphi technique (Dick, 2000; Dunham, 1996). A parallel sampling technique was used to collect and compare data from various groups (Mitra & Lankford, 1999) In total 219 surveys were completed. The survey results were analyzed to identify differences in the knowledge levels and self-reported adherence to the seven LNT minimal impact principles. Percentage and mean response values of the sample populations rather than more sophisticated statistical tests were determined adequate to reveal the differing knowledge and behavior of the canvassed segments (Mitra & Lankford, 1999; Veal, 1997). Without an existing standardized interpretative protocol, author judgment served to determine the satisfactory level of knowledge and self-reported behavior. Threshold levels were based on the perceived consequences, in the collective minds of the authors, of insufficient knowledge and inappropriate behavior. Trail Users 31% 60% 48% 84% 70% What is the best way to dispose of human waste (feces)? 63% 55% 67% 74% 58% 62% 87% 93% 81% 74% 100% 92% 32% 38% 42% 39% 93% 90% 90% 91% 100% 97% 89% 79% 92% 57% 95% 98% 80% 83% 86% 70% 63% 79% 83% 71% 90% 78% 89% 83% Result (%) within each group Deposit human waste in a small hole When camping in popular or high use Concentrate use on existing areas…. trails and campsites How should dirty dishwater be disposed? When cooking, it is best to…. Strain out food particles and scatter the dishwater. Cook only what you need and pack out the wrappers. When you are hiking on a trail with beautiful wildflowers, you should... Never pick even one flower. If campfires are permitted, how should you gather wood? Gather pieces of wood from the ground that can be easily broken. Leave the fire ring free of excess ashes, burned wood and trash. If you use an existing rock fire ring for your campfire, you should….. Biology Class Blomidon Naturalists Question Correct Answer Which of the following kinds of Grasses vegetation are most likely to resist or recover from human trampling? First Year Recreation 58% Overall Sustainable NS Class Table 1: Knowledge Test Results 32% 38% 5.31a 5.53b 5.17c Trail Users Blomidon Naturalists Sustainable NS Class Biology Class Statement Significant Difference First Year Recreation Mean Score Table 2: Backcountry Ethics Behavior Mean Scores 6.74d 6.24e 1. I would postpone a trip to my favorite area if I thought my visit would be harmful to wildlife at that time. 5.76 0.000 2. The natural environment is very fragile and easily degraded by visitor use. 3. It’s OK to camp close to another group in the wilderness. 4. It’s best to leave a deer antler for others to find. 5.82 0.322 5.79 5.92 5.43 6.16 5.76 3.56 0.103 3.86 3.38 3.09 3.42 3.79 4.61 0.006 4.17a 4.34b 4.35c 4.89d 5.23e 0.932 6.21 6.21 6.00 6.26 6.11 6.36 5.21 6.28 5.39 5.74 4.83 6.47 5.11 6.57 5.75 5.46a 5.23b 4.65c 5.95d 6.00e F(4, 214) = 9.08, p>0.0011 F(4, 211) =3.68, p>0.012 5. The native animals that live in parks and forests 6.16 have a greater right to live undisturbed than my right to visit these places. 6. It’s acceptable to feed wildlife human food. 6.34 7. It’s OK to move up close to wildlife to get a good look 8. Cutting a switchback is OK, especially when I am in a hurry. 5.37 0.141 0.112 5.49 0.000 9. Outdoor visitors have a moral responsibility to avoid or minimize their impacts to natural environments. 10. Selecting an attractive place to camp is more important to me than finding a durable campsite. 6.40 0.093 6.40 6.38 5.87 6.79 6.52 5.08 0.173 4.79 5.08 4.61 5.32 5.38 11. Collecting a few interesting rocks or feathers as souvenirs of my outdoor visit is OK. 3.85 0.002 3.67a 3.65b 2.96c 4.16d 4.43e 12. When I come across a muddy patch in a trail, I often tiptoe around the area rather than walk through the mud. 2.88 3.21 2.68 2.47 F(4, 210) = 5.42, p>0.0013 F(4, 213) = 4.41 p>0.014 0.372 2.87 3.00 Sustainable NS Class Blomidon Naturalists Trail Users 2.00 33% 2.05 35% 2.53 58% 2.34 46% When hiking through popular areas during my trip I: 2.49 2.60 0.036 55% 53% 2.56 57% 2.41 39% 2.74 74% 2.74 73% 2.59 65% 2.45 52% 2.37 58% 2.74 76% 2.0 39% -N/A 1.5 0% 3.0 100% 2.62 63% -N/A 2.0 0% 3.0 100% -2.00 0.610 N/A 25% 1.87 25% -N/A 2.0 0% 2.5 50% -2.67 0.748 N/A 75% 2.63 71% -3.0 2.5 N/A 100% 50% -N/A 2.0 0% -N/A 2.0 0% -2.25 0.440 N/A 50% 2.12 29% -N/A 2.0 3.0 50% 100% 1) Did not stay on designated or wellestablished trails 2) Sometimes stayed… 3) Always stayed….. First Year Recreation 2.21 2.19 0.033 67% 80% Answers (From least to most LNT appropriate) Backcountry Practices Sig. Difference Before leaving on 1) Left my food in the original packaging my trip I: 2) Repackaged some of my food 3) Repackaged most of my food Question Overall Biology Class Table 3: Backcountry Practices and Overnight Visitor Responses (Mean and Percentages) From my trip I: 1) Kept several souvenirs that I found 2.62 2.60 0.134 2) Kept one souvenir 62% 68% 3) Didn’t keep anything from the area I visited. Overnight Visitors Before leaving on my trip, I: 1) Had no knowledge of my destination area’s camping regulations or recommendations -2.08 0.241 2) Was somewhat aware… N/A 42% 3) Was well aware of the area’s camping regulations or recommended practices. During my trip, I generally placed my tent on a spot with: After washing dishes I: 1) Forbs (erect-stemmed, broad-leaved plants) -2) Grasses or sedges 2.58 0.137 N/A 3) Bare soil, rock, gravel or sand. 58% 1) Poured the dishwater on the ground 2) Scattered the dishwater away from camp 3) Strained the dishwater to remove particles and then scattered it away from camp. I disposed of 1) Burning all leftovers the trash and 2) Burning some items and packing out others leftover food by: 3) Packing out all trash and leftovers. During my trip I: 1) Built a campfire using wood that could not be broken by hand 2) Built a campfire using downed wood that could easily be broken by hand. 3) Never Built a Campfire During my trip I: 1) Took no precautions to keep wildlife from getting into my food. 2) Hook a few precautions to….. 3) Hung my food or placed it in a container designed to protect it from wildlife 2.0 0% N/A 2.0 0% Substantial room for improvement in knowledge, ethics and behaviour Need for focused and targeted LNT type education as well as more generalized messages for the general public Focus educational efforts on weaknesses identified in Table 4. Results suggest priorities for on-site LNT messages Weaknesses raise the question as to whether Indirect Management Methods would be sufficient to protect the Cape Split environment. Durability Human Waste Dirty Dish Water Respecting Others Plan Ahead Campfire Alternatives Encourage “Camp & Travel on Durable Surfaces Encourage proper disposal of human waste Provide facts on how to properly dispose of dirty dishwater Promote respect for other wilderness visitors Encourage users to plan ahead Promote refrain or lessen impact from campfires Apply questionnaire to several popular hiking locations. Identify and survey other potential user groups such as Outdoor Equipment Store patrons and employees. Survey and observe actual user behaviour as participant observer (Ellis, 2005). Design, apply and evaluate the effectiveness of LNT messages on site.