Transcript 2010 MASSP/MCCTA Fall Conference Listening, Learning, Leading

2010 MASSP/MCCTA
Fall Conference
Listening, Learning, Leading
Listening, Learning, Leading
Margie Vandeven
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Quality Schools
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Administrative arm of the State Board of Education

School-improvement and regulatory

Operates Missouri School for the Blind (St. Louis), Missouri
School for the Deaf (Fulton) and the statewide system of
Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled.

Administers state’s vocational rehabilitation and sheltered
workshop programs which provide services for adult
Missouri citizens with disabilities.
◦ 522 school districts
◦ 892,000 students (K-12)
◦ 71,000 classroom teachers
The Department of Elementary
and Secondary Education
Vision: Missouri public schools: the best
choice… the best results!
Mission: To guarantee the superior
preparation and performance
of every child in school and in
life.
The Department of Elementary
and Secondary Education
“If we continue on our current course, and the
number of nations outpacing us in the education
race continues to grow at its current rate, the
American standard of living will steadily fall
relative to those nations, rich and poor, that are
doing a better job.”
Tough Times or Tough Choices: The Report of the New Commission on the Skills of
the American Workforce Source: www.skillscommission.org/executive.htm 37
The Urgency

Missouri’s students will rank in the top 10 on
national and international assessments of
student performance.

Missouri will provide quality early childhood
educational opportunities.

Missouri will recruit, prepare, retain and support
effective teachers and leaders.

The Department will improve departmental
efficiency, operational effectiveness, and effective
relations with internal and external constituents.
Department Goals

Work toward serving all 3-5 year old children in a
voluntary pre-k program

“If Missouri's children are to keep pace with their
peers around the world, we must dramatically
ramp up the preparation we give them − from
pre-school through graduate school.” (Governor
Nixon’s remarks at the Higher Education Summit,
August 17, 2010)

Screen ALL children beginning at 6 months of
age in health and developmental domains.

Focus on Family and Parental Involvement
Early Learning

Across-the-board academic gains this year

Largest gains in mathematics

More than 67,000 high school students took the
Algebra I end-of-course exam, and the percentage of
students demonstrating proficiency or advanced
improved by 4.6 percentage points, to 57.3 percent.

In English, high school students nudged the bar in
English II by 0.6 percentage points.

Percent Proficient and Advanced needs increase
MAP Scores
ACT Scores
Missouri School Improvement Program
 A good school is one where
◦ Students perform to standards
◦ School is improving its performance over time
◦ Individual students make growth
Educational resources, processes and
outcomes
 Districts with highest need are prioritized
in the Department’s review schedule

School Improvement

Did we follow the right process?

Did we look at the right things?

Did we identify the right schools?

Did we do what we were supposed to do to
help?

Did what we did make a difference?
4th Cycle Results








Early Intervention
Growth Models
Interim Assessment
College and Career Readiness
Adult Accountability
Early Learning
New Assessment SY 2013-2014
Purpose of the APR
Upcoming Focus






The district provides adequate postsecondary preparation for all students.
ACT, SAT, or college and career-ready high school
assessment
Percentage of students who successfully
complete CTE or Advanced Courses
Percentage of high school graduates who earn a
college- and career-ready diploma
Percentage who earn college credit while still in
high school
Percentage who require remediation upon
entering college
Post-Secondary Preparation
Fall
Semester
of…
Public
PostSecondary Number
Pct
ACT Avg.
ACT
Tested
% ACT
Tested
Pct in
Remed
Math
Pct in
Remed
English
Pct in
Remed
Reading
Total Pct
in Remed
2009
aggregate
200
100.00%
21.2
141
70.50%
42.50%
29.00%
23.00%
50.50%
2009
4 year
71
35.50%
23.2
68
95.80%
11.50%
4.60%
1.10%
11.50%
2009
2 year
129
64.50%
19.4
73
56.60%
60.00%
31.50%
31.50%
67.90%
2008
aggregate
247
100.00%
21.8
174
70.40%
37.20%
21.90%
15.40%
44.90%
2008
4 year
101
40.90%
23.9
98
97.00%
9.90%
5.90%
suppressed
13.90%
2008
2 year
146
59.10%
19.42
76
52.10%
56.20%
32.90%
26.00%
66.40%
2007
aggregate
252
100.00%
21.1
183
72.60%
43.30%
22.20%
21.00%
48.40%
2007
4 year
87
34.50%
23.13
85
97.70%
11.50%
4.60%
1.10%
11.50%
2007
2 year
165
65.50%
19.43
98
59.40%
60.00%
31.50%
31.50%
67.90%
Aggregate vs. Disaggregated Remediation






Standards-based Accountability
Status/Improvement/Growth
Closing the Achievement Gap
College and Career-Readiness
Distinction in Performance
Early Intervention
Scoring Guide Discussion
School Year 20102011
5th year of 4th Cycle
 Develop MSIP 5

School Year 20112012
Piloting MSIP 5
 Pilot MSIP 5
Districts scheduled for 
reviews during the 5th
year of 4th cycle
SIG districts or
districts in need of
review
School Year 2012 2013
1st year of MSIP 5
 Fully Implement
MSIP 5
Accountability – 4th cycle
standards
Accountability – Choice to Accountability – MSIP 5
use 4th cycle standards or standards
newly- piloted MSIP 5
Data – All 4th Cycle
standards
Data – MSIP 5 standards
only
standards; Group Specific
MSIP 5
Data – All 4th Cycle &
MSIP 5 standards
Transition from 4th Cycle to MSIP 5

Outstanding Schools Act of 1993

Primary goal: to ensure that all students who graduate
from Missouri high schools are well prepared to pursue
advanced education and employment.

44,100 students benefited

Effective August 28, the Missouri Department of Higher
Education will begin administering the postsecondary
scholarship component of the A+ program.

The Department is working with high schools to identify
students (via transcript and the student information data
collection system (MOSIS) who are eligible for A+
scholarships.
A+ Schools

Missouri has adopted the k-12 and college and career
ready Common Core Standards in English language
arts and in mathematics.

Working with higher education institutions to advance
their adoption of the college and career-ready
standards as their admissions requirements.

Work is underway to develop common standards in
science, social studies, fine arts and other areas.

Watch your email for notification about these drafts
and for other assessment updates.
Common Core Standards

Missouri is one of 32 states in the Smarter-Balanced Assessment
Consortium. Missouri is one of 17 “governing” states.

$160 million awarded by the U.S. Department of Education to
support development of a next-generation assessment system
development.

The system will include formative, interim/benchmark and
summative assessments including both end-of-course and end-ofhigh school (college and career readiness) tests.

Assessments will include items similar to those in the current
system—multiple choice, constructed response, and performance
events. All assessment will be available on-line.

The system will replace our current MAP/EOC tests for English
language arts and mathematics starting in 2013-2014.
Common Core Assessments
Internationally benchmarked
 Research-based
 Cost-effective
 Reduces the burden on local teachers
and leaders

Why Common Standards and
Common Assessments?
Missouri Common Core State Standards
Rollout Schedule
Grade-Level and EOC assessments will continue to be aligned to the v2.0
GLEs/CLEs through the
2012- 2013 school year.


Collaborative of states working to upgrade the
rigor of the high school diploma in the United
States.
The states in the network are guided by the
following efforts:
◦ Align high school standards with the demands of college
and careers.
◦ Require students to take a college- and career-ready
curriculum to earn a high school diploma.
◦ Develop statewide high school assessment systems
anchored to college- and career-ready expectations.
◦ Develop reporting and accountability systems that
promote college and career readiness.
American Diploma Project
Network Discussion
SFSF II Reporting requirement
District to submit:
 A description of the system used to evaluate the performance of
teachers and principals;
 The manner in which the LEA uses the results of the evaluations
for making decisions on professional development, compensation,
promotion, retention, and removal;
 Whether the evaluation includes student achievement outcomes
and student growth data; and
 The number and percent of teachers and principals rated at each
performance rating or level for each LEA.

Template provided for internal use.
Educator Evaluations
•At this time
•Conservative planning and expenditures
•Foundation formula
•Jobs bill
•Sources of revenue for schools in 2008-09
were 58.4% local, 33.2% state, and 8.4%
federal.
Budget
•Charter school funding and accountability
•Open enrollment
•Proration of the foundation formula
•Unaccredited school districts
Key Legislative Issues for 2011

Effective Aug. 28, state law requires
school districts to put the terms “cyberbullying” and “electronic communications”
into their anti-bullying policies.
Cyber-bullying

A Thoughtful and Relentless Focus on
Instruction

Flexibility and Accountability

Not only Raising the Rigor
◦ Redesigning classroom approach so students
can reach increased standards
Leadership Matters
Margie Vandeven
Office of Quality Schools
[email protected]
573.751.4234
Thank you!