Transcript Slide 1
Washington State Archives Toolkit for the Future Electronic Records Preservation Presented by: Russell Wood State Records Manager Overview • Tools for preservation and the future • Chapter 434-662 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) • Partners in Preservation – Digital Archives Gone forever There are electronic records that are now extinct and gone forever • Governor Gardner’s administrative files (Wang system, erased) • Governor Spellman’s reports and letters (Mag Cards, unreadable) On the endangered list How many floppy disks, CD’s, tapes, DVD’s, or other soon to be obsolete media contain records of enduring value that are not well preserved and in danger of being unreadable and inaccessible? Archival Records The mission of the Washington State Archives is to preserve and protect archival records • To centralize • To make widely available • To ensure permanent preservation What does Archiving mean for Electronic Records? To protect and preserve machine readable records of enduring legal, historical or fiscal value from loss, alteration, deterioration and technological obsolescence in an environment independent from that which produced the record. Records in the Electronic Age “Digitized” Those records scanned or otherwise converted into a digital or electronic format “Born Digital” Records created on a computer or other electronic device WAC 434-662 Pursuant to the provisions of chapters 40.14, and 42.56, and 43.105.250 RCW, the rules contained in this chapter are intended to ensure that electronic public records are securely preserved for present and future access and/or are transferred to the Washington state digital archives for permanent retention so that valuable historical records of the state may be centralized, made more widely available, and insure permanent preservation. #1 in the Tool Kit Records Management “The efficient and systematic control of the creation, receipt, maintenance, use and disposition of records, including the processes for capturing and maintaining evidence of and information about business activities and transactions in the form of records”. ISO 15489 Also known as… “Should it stay, or should it go?” #2 in the Tool Kit Retention Schedules An approved legal document that specifies minimum retention periods for a record series and gives agencies ongoing disposition authority after approved retention periods are met The process • Schedules are developed, submitted for approval and become the legal authority for retention and disposition • Records series with enduring value are designated as “Archival” by the State Archivist • Archival designation appears on Records Retention Schedules Disposition • At the end of the retention period, one of two things happen – the record stays or it goes • Archival series are transferred to the custody of State Archives for preservation and protection #3 in the Tool Kit Applying the Knowledge Applying good recordkeeping fundamentals and using retention schedules to manage and protect electronic records #4 in the Tool Kit Using What You Have • Can use your existing resources • Do not need to purchase additional technology to manage your electronic records • Policies and procedures, education and training are key! Tools and tips • Make the most of the existing technology tools, maximize potential • Use records management and retention schedules to make information management effective and efficient A brief word on metadata THE IMPORTANCE OF METADATA • Descriptive information that facilitates management of, and access to, the objects being described – “data about the data” • A means of describing: – What is in the record – Circumstances of creation and use – the 5 W’s – Who, what, why, where, when • Need to maintain metadata as part of complete record to establish authenticity, facilitate retrieval, and to understand the record’s context and relevance Metadata happens • Can be automatic – Date and time stamp, creator, title and other identifiers for an e-mail • Can be manually applied – Elements can be manually applied to aid in indexing, searching and retrieval (subject, titles, record series, classifications and more) Using Metadata • Basic metadata – Minimal metadata provides the essential information about the item • Expanded metadata – Supports the management of a record, helps search and retrieval functionality – Identifies, provides context, and authenticates for electronic records management and discovery (FBI as case example) E-mail Metadata Basic • To and from • Date and time stamp • Cc • Subject For example Koziara, Leslie From: Sent: To: Subject: Koziara, Leslie Friday, July 18, 2008 9:15 AM Wood, Russell Electronic Records Preservation Training Packets Dear Russell: In developing the training and outreach for electronic records preservation, I came across an article written by the New York Times on that exact subject. I am attaching this article for your review. I plan on quoting Dr. Berman from the San Diego Supercomputer Center as to how preservation is something everyone is struggling with and try to raise the awareness of how digital information is in reality quite fragile, and that budget and costs sometimes are not seriously considered in maintenance and preservation for the long term. I’d like to include a copy of the article in the packets for the “Toolkit for the Future” workshop we are doing on July 31st. What do you think? Leslie Koziara Records Management Trainer Washington State Archives 360-586-4893 More e-mail metadata Expanded • Return path tells other computers who really sent the message and where to send error messages (bounces and warning) • Received field with its complete address and time stamp; this helps in tracking delivery problems • Message-ID, a unique identifier for this specific message. This ID is logged, and can be traced through computers on the message route if there is a need to track the mail • Bcc metadata Basic metadata Expanded metadata Scanning metadata Expanded • Even a physical item may have metadata – Barcodes – RFID (Radio Frequency ID) Metadata aids in inventory and location of physical items Even to the end • Metadata “stubs” provide evidence of the disposition process • Act as a record of the destruction of electronic documents - “in-house destruction” document for compliance Let’s play celebrity metadata • Pick a celebrity – Movies – Sports – Music – Art • Use key words to “file” that celebrity E-mail Management • E-mails are “born digital” and their metadata establishes their authenticity as a record • E-mails need to be retained in electronic format for their minimum retention period according to records retention schedules • By printing e-mails and destroying the electronic records you may damage the authenticity of the e-mail • Agencies can still print e-mails, as long as the electronic record is retained E-mail as a record • Not all e-mails are records • Risks with “auto delete” functions • “E-mail archiving” is just usually “e-mail storage”, it does not generally contain retention or disposition functionality How to keep • Identify key records series • Create classification and file structures • Develop naming conventions (controlled vocabularies) • Determine best storage method for your agency needs • Educate and train users, use desk guides and “cheat sheets” Electronic file cabinets Think electronic “file cabinets” Just like traditional metal cabinets used for paper Setting up the files • Can be individual “drawers” – working files set up in e-mail application • Can be work group or section “file cabinets” – files sent to shared drive or server used by group • Can be “central files” or “records center” – files sent to central storage or central repository E-MAIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY # 1 PRINT OUT E-MAILS (Not Recommended) Print ONLY if you are keeping electronic version according to retention PRO: • Paper easier to preserve • Can file with existing paper records E-MAIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY # 1 PRINT OUT E-MAILS (Not Recommended) CON: • • • • Metadata is lost Greatly reduced functionality – not searchable Authenticity issues – ability to manipulate before printing Court proceedings are increasingly finding paper copies inadequate and are requiring submittal of electronically stored information (ESI) in native file format – Armstrong vs. Executive Office of the President – hard copy is a “dismembered document” E-MAIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY # 2 FILE MANUALLY WITHIN E-MAIL SYSTEM PRO: • Saves metadata and remains searchable CON: • Access and use only by individual user – no central storage or access • Keeping in e-mail system slows system down – mailbox limits • Random filing practices, 10 people = 10 different ways of filing, 10 different file names, 10 different places to look How it works • Individual users move e-mails determined as records into folders they have set up – Should be able to do with any e-mail application • Users then are responsible for retention and disposition • Random filing practices, lack of naming conventions can make searching difficult Can look like this Another example E-MAIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY # 3 MANUALLY IN FOLDERS ON SECURED SHARE DRIVE OR SERVER PRO: • Provides consistent method for organizing and retaining electronic records • Centralized storage, accessible to multiple users simultaneously E-MAIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY # 3 MANUALLY IN FOLDERS CON: • Time-intensive and challenging to set up • Requires use of naming conventions, filing systems, authentication protocols/access restrictions • Requires developing and implementing a filing structure that is simple and logical for a large number of people • Remember that humans are resistant to change, will need to educate and train all users in new procedures How it works • Designated shared drive is used for storage or “respository” • Users save e-mails into specified folders • Users can retrieve and move at will • Uses standardized naming conventions (controlled vocabulary) • Generally no active retention or disposition applied, subject to ad hoc practices In addition • Can appoint administrator for the LAN server • More centralized than individual folders in e-mail applications • Increased search capability • Can apply retention and disposition to stored records Can look like this Next click Another click LAN Server – Another Basic Example Water Quality CAFO Program Stormwater Manual Boatyard Permits TMDL Dairy Farms W. Washington Stormwater Joe’s Marina Spokane River TMDL LAN Server – Using General Retention Schedule Basic Example Records Transient GS 50 Correspondence General Intermediate GS 09 Most GS 01 Long Term GS 10 Most GS 03 Archival GS 10 Most GS 03 Cash Receipts Banking Records Payroll (Retirement related) Rules Regulations (WAC’s) Explore your options • There are several options depending on your agency needs and resources • Do your homework and research • Take the time to develop standards and business classification schemes, use your retention schedules! E-MAIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY # 4 USING AN ELECTRONIC RM SYSTEM (E-mail archiving or document management systems) PRO: • Can take place manually or automatically (rule-based, filters, increased metadata elements) • Can manage e-mail alongside other electronic records • Centralized storage • Administrative controls applied evenly E-MAIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY # 4 USING AN ELECTRONIC RM SYSTEM (E-mail archiving or document management systems) CON: • Can be expensive • Initial setup is time-intensive and challenging • If entirely automatic, how do you ensure that e-mails are classified and managed correctly? (Remember Intel?) How it works: • User declares record under predetermined classification or classification scheme • Sent to repository • Administrators have access and control of centralized repository - search, access, authentication In addition • User can still retrieve own records, however users cannot delete • Retention and disposition handled by defined rules • Human intervention is still recommended • Auto deletion is not a good idea Can look like this Permit 2007 Application 555 Main St Declare Permit 2007 Issued 555 Main St Declare Permit 2007 Inspection 555 Main St Permits 2007 Applications Issued Inspections 555 Main St Declare Manual or auto Captured Administered Retention & Disposition Costs • Costs associated with keeping electronic records are already being imposed on agencies due to public disclosure and e-discovery (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Dec 1, 2006) • The costs increase as long-term electronic information has to be migrated or recopied over time – “technology happens” to keep up with demands for accessibility and storage Reducing Costs The WAC actively seeks to reduce the existing cost burden on state and local agencies for maintaining and preserving their archival electronic records by providing the mechanisms for agencies to transfer archival records (along with the associated costs for preservation) to the Washington State Archives Where to From Here? • Currently drafting responses to comments, suggestions and questions received on the draft Electronic Preservation WAC • Next step is minor edits and developing a cost benefit analysis • Phased compliance with e-mail and website management sections being considered • Working group to advise on implementation is being developed Thank you! Washington State Archives Partners in preservation and access www.secstate.wa.gov/archives