Transcript Slide 1

“Workplace Mental Health and Psychological
Safety – Moving the Agenda Forward "
Ian M. F. Arnold
OEMAC 2010 Scientific Conference
Saskatoon ,Saskatchewan
Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives:
 Learn about the MHCC’s national approach to
training and certification in Peer Support
 Acquire knowledge on the business case for
improving workplace management of mental
health including Dr. Martin Shain’s new report
“Tracking the Perfect Legal Storm”
 Understand how a Workplace Standard on
Psychological Health and Safety will improve
the management of psychological health and
safety in the workplace leading to better
health for employees and their organizations.
The MHCC - in the beginning:
• Senate Standing Committee on Mental Health – Chaired by
Senator Kirby;
• Many studies completed including “Out of the Shadows at Last”;
• Public demand for a Commission on Mental Health recognized in
“Out of the Shadows at Last”;
• August, 2007 - Prime Minister Harper announced the formation
of the Mental Health Commission of Canada, Chaired by the
Honourable Michael Kirby;
• All governments in agreement - the Commission design,
structure and mandate is based on an understanding of
Canadian constitutional reality – health care is a provincial and
territorial responsibility.
What is the MHCC’s mandate?
• Non-profit, at arm’s length from all levels of
government, funding from Health Canada.
• Five strategic initiatives:






Mental health strategy for Canada;
Anti-stigma/discrimination initiative;
Knowledge exchange;
Homeless research demonstration
projects;
Partners for Mental Health.
MHCC Peer Support Project
• MHCC as “catalyst” for mental health
system transformation.
The MHCC’s Peer Project - Strategic Intent
• Create the conditions by which we can leverage, on
a wide scale, the acquired skills of people who have
lived mental health experience;
• Provide a robust enabling framework for
organisations and systems to enhance current peer
programs or launch new peer initiatives, build
capacity and reverse the current trends;
• Develop and Launch Peer Accreditation Canada
• [email protected]
The Peer Project – What is a “Peer”
 Two main components:
1. Peer Support Practitioners: enhance the utilization of
peer support through the creation and application of
national standards of practice*;
2. Peer Educators: encourage a change in societal
attitudes towards mental illnesses through peer based
education strategies specifically targeting adults in
workplaces and later youth in schools;
*
Current focus is on Peer Support standards of
practise (SoP)
End Objectives of the Peer Project
 Creation of a standardized national practice for peersupport (certification);
 Workplace readiness assessment for introducing peer
support systems;
 Peer support worker selection, training and professional
development;
 Peer educator training and development;
 Custom workplace mental health curriculum
development;
 A national, web-based peer support community of
practise;
 Peer Support mentoring and peer support case
management / advice.
Peer Project: Broad Project Timeline
Analyse:
consultation
results
Develop:
•Standards of Practise
•Certification Process
•Research Methodology
2011
2010
2012
Consult
Assess
Analyse
Develop
2014
2013
Adapt
Expand
Modify
Learn
Adapt
Modify
Assess findings
Implement pilot projects
Performance measurement
Measurement of outcomes
Progressive consultation:
•7 locations in Canada
•comprehensive survey
(Note : 569 Agencies and Peer
Support Workers across Canada)
Adapt:
Assist organizations to develop
adapted implementation models
So many issues…why
workplace mental health?
Changing
demographics may
increase competition
for talent
Productivity is linked to
employee mental health
Cost trends due to
turnover, disability
and absenteeism
may be increasing
Physical wellbeing is linked to
mental health
Seven million
Canadians will
experience a
mental health
problem this year
– that’s about one
in five of us
If we include
addictions, that’s
one in three
Injuries are linked
to mental health
Many, many more
if we add stress
and burnout
What are the goals?

To have employees who
want to come to work each
day

To enhance our ability to
maximize the potential of
each employee

To do no harm to employees

To improve the mental
health of our employees
O H P’s can take a leadership role in promoting
management of workplace psychological health and safety
Some people feel there is no need to
improve workplace mental health !
1. Not a workplace responsibility – it’s
personal
2. Costs too much money
3. Not enough time in the work day
4. We have benefits already
5. Our people are fine now
What is the Workforce Advisory
Committee Doing?
Six strategic initiatives:

Review of the jurisprudence psychological health
and safety in the workplace (Dr. Martin Shain)

Research project on employment sustainability for
persons with significant mental health issues (U of
T “Aspiring Workforce project”)

Research project to define existing best practices
(SFU – “Integrated Approach to Workplace M. H.”)

Leadership Initiative – the business case

Development of workplace standards for
psychological health and safety

Initiated development of an MHCC peer support*
accreditation and certification process under the
direction of Lt. Col. Stephane Grenier.
* Now a major MHCC project
separate from the WAC
Mental Health Leadership Initiative –
Moving forward – A Work in Progress
 The Mental Health Leadership Initiative builds on the pioneering
enterprise of the Global Business and Economic Roundtable on
Addiction and Mental Health;
 In 1998, the Roundtable coined the phrase "mental health in the
workplace“ and continues to support the vision that the mental
health of working Canadians is both a business and economic
asset;
 The Mental Health Leadership Initiative includes:
 Key aspects of the Roundtable’s 2007 “CFO Framework for
Mental Health and Productivity”;
 Evolving legal requirements;
 A comprehensive framework approach to manage Mental
Health in the workplace.
The Business Case is Clear
1. Corporate Social Responsibility
 Includes employees as well as external stakeholders
2. Cost Effectiveness
 In productivity as well as cost trend management
3. Risk Management
 OH&S, Human Rights, Disability Legislation
4. Recruitment and Retention
 The competition for talent
1. Corporate Social Responsibility
Towards employees, the community,
shareholders,
and other stakeholders
Whose responsibility is it?
“When it affects my business,
it is my responsibility.”
And...Bill C45* takes it even further.
*Bill C-45 is federal legislation that became law on March 31, 2004. It established new legal
duties for workplace health and safety; imposed serious penalties for violations resulting in
injuries or death; and provided new rules for attributing criminal liability to organizations,
including corporations, their representatives and those who direct the work of others.
Mental Health in the Workplace
Building Leadership Commitment
~
Don McKinnon
This Video is part of a series of Videos available at
http://www.mhccleadership.ca/
Some indicators that mental health
may be a concern…
 Employees, including managers, hiding stress until they reach
a breaking point or become ill
 Failure to achieve targets and meet deadlines
 Conflict among and between employees
 Good employees quitting or transferring
 People taking more time off than seems reasonable
 Difficulty in returning people to work from disability
Working can be good for mental health
Disability duration is less when:
 There is positive mental health (all disabilities)
 Good coping strategies for stressors exist
 Workplace issues are resolved quickly
Time off and return to work:
 The longer someone is off, the less chance
there is of a successful return to work
 6 months off – 50%, 9 months – 10%
 Focus on prevention and early intervention
2. Cost Effectiveness
The biggest single cause of workplace
related disability in North America is
associated with mental health conditions
Watson Wyatt Worldwide 2009/2010 Survey*
 In Canada, mental health is the
leading cause of both Short Term
Disability (STD) and Long Term
Disability (LTD), in the U. S. it is the
4th greatest cause for STD and the 3rd
for LTD
 Companies with the most effective
health and productivity programs:




11% > revenue per employee
< medical trends by 1.2%
1.8 fewer days absent per employee
28% > shareholder returns
* The study involved 282 U. S. and 70 Canadian organizations representing more
than 11 million employees in all major industry sectors
http://www.towerswatson.com/research/648
The Cost of Doing Nothing
Negative trends in costs:
 Absenteeism
 Presenteeism/lost productivity/quality
 Grievances/complaints /reputation
 Disability
 Turnover
 Serious injuries/illnesses
 Annually, related to mental illnesses, the
private sector spends between $180 and $300
million on short-term disability benefits and
$135 million for long-term disability
benefits*.
* Institute of Health Economics, Final Report, June 2010
Mental Health in the Workplace
Building Leadership Commitment
~
Rob MacLellan
This Video is part of a series of Videos available at
http://www.mhccleadership.ca/
3. Recruitment and Retention
Engaged employees generate 43% more
revenue than disengaged ones*
* Hay Group – “Engage Employees and boost performance 2001”
Recruitment and Retention:
Towards sustainable organizations
Employees today expect organizations to support personal and
professional growth – good mental health is one of the keys to success
Attracting
employees in
a competitive
market is a
challenge
Prospective
employees are
looking for the
“right culture”
to support their
personal and
professional
ambitions
Positive workplace mental health enhances organizational
sustainability, including employee recruitment and retention.
4. Risk Management
Dr. Martin Shain, in his 2010 report to
the MHCC, said...
“We observe seven major trends in the
law becoming stronger by the year.
We can characterize these trends as
pressures building toward a perfect
legal storm, where the whole is far
greater than the sum of the parts.”
A psychologically safe workplace is no
longer a “nice to do”.
It is now a “must do”.
Remedies available to employees
 “For the first time in Canadian history, it
appears that real redress for harm to
psychological health is within reach of
many, if not most workers” (Shain, 2010)
 Financial awards
 Have been large on occasion and have
increased in size over the past six years
by as much as 700%
 Systemic, remedial orders to fix
conditions of work that contribute to
mental injury
 Varied across the country
Influences on the Duty to Provide a
Psychologically Safe Workplace
Employment
Standards
Legislation
Labour
Relations Law
Duty to Provide a
Psychologically Safe
Workplace
Employment
contract
Occupational
Health and Safety
Legislation
Human
Rights
Legislation
Law of Torts
(negligence)
Workers
Compensation
Law
Mental injury and psychological
safety in the workplace
 Mental injury is not the same as mental illness. It is harm to
mental health [mental suffering] that significantly affects the
ability of employees to function at work and at home.
 “A psychologically safe workplace is one in which every
practical effort is made to avoid reasonably foreseeable injury
to the mental health of employees” (Shain, 2009)
Tracking the Perfect Legal Storm (Shain, 2010)
 A perfect legal storm is
brewing in the area of mental
health protection at work
 This storm brings with it a
rising tide of liability for
employers who fail to provide
a psychologically safe work
environment
 Yet, employers lack the tools
to assess and address
workplace risks to
psychological health
Shain (2009) recommendations for psychological
safety at work: Corporate and national policy levels
 Corporate level:
employers wise to
identify, measure, assess
and abate threats to
psychological health
 National policy
 Population health policy
– zero tolerance
 National standards for
measurement and
management along with
training, education,
advice and consultation
Key WAC Initiative – A National
Standard on Psychological Health and
Safety in the Workplace
 December 2009 - MHCC/WAC, with Great West Life, holds
consensus meeting in Vancouver – National Standard
supported by all attendees, consensus statement issued:
“It is our vision to see the development of a National
Standard of Canada on psychological health and safety in the
workplace by December 1, 2011, and uptake by employers
resulting in a measureable improvement in psychological
health and safety within three years of that date.”
 Early 2010, discussion held with Canadian Standards
Association (CSA) and the Bureau de Normalization du
Quebec (BNQ)
 02/10 Statement of Understanding agreed to by MHCC,
CSA, BNQ
Psychological Health and Safety in the
Workplace – a National Standard for Canada
 Objective: to provide employers
with a methodology that will lead
to measurable and sustainable
improvements in psychological
health and safety
 Stand alone, voluntary standard
 To be developed jointly by the
Canadian Standards Association
and the Bureau de Normalization
du Quebec, contracted by MHCC
 Will align with other international
efforts.
Psychological Health and Safety in the
Workplace – Alignment with other Standards
 Will be consistent with the British
Standards Institutes Guidance
document, the OHSAS 18000 and
CSA Z 1000 Health and Safety
Standards, and the BNQ Healthy
Enterprises standard
 Standard to follow the ISO
framework with 5 key elements:
 Policy and commitment
 Planning
 Implementation and Operation
 Checking and Corrective Action
 Management Review
Action Plan for the Workplace
– A Sustainable Approach
A sustainable approach is needed:
1. Set Policy, demonstrate commitment
2. Plan – assess where you are now and where
you want to go – define needs



Financial impact (absenteeism, presenteeism)
Employee health impact (HRAs, other data)
Structural attributes that promote good mental
health (e.g. Guarding Minds at Work)
3. Implement programs that address your
organizations defined needs
4. Evaluate program operation and effectiveness
5. Review, reassess and improve
Conclusions
 Peer support systems will benefit those with mental health
challenges and ease the workload for other professionals;
 A systematic and sustainable approach for psychological health
and safety, on a parallel with how physical health and safety is
managed, is becoming a business imperative;
 The business case is clear – social responsibility, cost
effectiveness, recruitment and retention, and risk management;
 Development of a standard on psychological health and safety in
the workplace will provide a solid basis for action: leadership
commitment, policy, planning, implementation, measurement,
and review will ensure continual improvement for employees and
employers.
The time to act is now
A selection of resources that are available on-line
The MHCC Leadership Initiative: http://www.mhccleadership.ca/
The Peer Support Project: [email protected]
The Shain Reports:
http://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/Key_Documents/en/2
009/Stress%20at%20Work%20MHCC%20V%203%20Feb%202009.pdf
Guarding Minds at Work: http://www.guardingmindsatwork.ca/
The Great West Life Centre for Mental Health:
http://www.gwlcentreformentalhealth.com/english/index.asp
Working Through It – Stories of People dealing with workplace mental health issues:
http://www.gwlcentreformentalhealth.com/english/display.asp?l1=2&l2=17&l3=173&d=173
The Mental Health Commission of Canada (MHCC):
http://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/
Business in the Community – Business Action on Health (BITC – U. K.),
http://www.bitc.org.uk/workplace/health_and_wellbeing/index.html
Thanks for your interest
Mental Health Commission of Canada
10301 Southport Lane S.W., Suite 800, Calgary, AB T2W 1S7
For further information, check out our website at
www.mentalhealthcommission.ca
or contact us at
[email protected]