Chapter 9 Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories

Download Report

Transcript Chapter 9 Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories

Chemistry, The Central Science

, 10th edition Theodore L. Brown, H. Eugene LeMay, Jr., and Bruce E. Bursten

Chapter 9 Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories

John D. Bookstaver St. Charles Community College  St. Peters, MO 2006, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Molecular Shapes

• The shape of a molecule plays an important role in its reactivity.

• By noting the number of bonding and nonbonding electron pairs we can easily predict the shape of the molecule.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

What Determines the Shape of a Molecule?

• Simply put, electron pairs, whether they be bonding or nonbonding, repel each other.

• By assuming the electron pairs are placed as far as possible from each other, we can predict the shape of the molecule.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Electron Domains

• This molecule has four electron domains.

• We can refer to the electron pairs as electron domains .

• In a double or triple bond, all electrons shared between those two atoms are on the same side of the central atom; therefore, they count as one electron domain.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory (VSEPR)

“The best arrangement of a given number of electron domains is the one that minimizes the repulsions among them.”

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Electron-Domain Geometries

These are the electron-domain geometries for two through six electron domains around a central atom. (p. 319) Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Electron-Domain Geometries

• All one must do is count the number of electron domains in the Lewis structure.

• The geometry will be that which corresponds to that number of electron domains.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Molecular Geometries

• The electron-domain geometry is often

not

the shape of the molecule, however.

• The molecular geometry is that defined by the positions of

only

the atoms in the molecules, not the nonbonding pairs.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Molecular Geometries

Within each electron domain, then, there might be more than one molecular geometry.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Linear Electron Domain

• In this domain, there is only one molecular geometry: linear.

• NOTE: If there are only two atoms in the molecule, the molecule will be linear no matter what the electron domain is.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Trigonal Planar Electron Domain

• There are two molecular geometries:  Trigonal planar, if all the electron domains are bonding  Bent, if one of the domains is a nonbonding pair.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Nonbonding Pairs and Bond Angle

• Nonbonding pairs are physically larger than bonding pairs.

• Therefore, their repulsions are greater; this tends to decrease bond angles in a molecule.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.1

Using the VSEPR Model

Use the VSEPR model to predict the molecular geometry of

(a)

O 3 ,

(b)

SnCl 3 – .

Solve: (a)

We can draw two resonance structures for O 3 : Because of resonance, the bonds between the central O atom and the outer O atoms are of equal length. In both resonance structures the central O atom is bonded to the two outer O atoms and has one nonbonding pair. Thus, there are three electron domains about the central O atoms. (Remember that a double bond counts as a single electron domain.) The best arrangement of three electron domains is trigonal planar ( Table 9.1

). Two of the domains are from bonds, and one is due to a nonbonding pair, so the molecule has a bent shape with an ideal bond angle of 120 ° ( Table 9.2

).

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.1

continued

(b)

The Lewis structure for the SnCl 3 – ion is The central Sn atom is bonded to the three Cl atoms and has one nonbonding

pair. Therefore, the Sn atom has four electron domains around it. The resulting

electron-domain geometry is tetrahedral (

Table 9.1

) with one of the corners

occupied by a nonbonding pair of electrons. The molecular geometry is thus

trigonal pyramidal ( Table 9.2

), like that of NH 3 .

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Predict the electron-domain geometry and the molecular geometry for

(a) (b)

CO 3 2– .

Answers: (a)

tetrahedral, bent;

(b)

trigonal planar, trigonal planar SeCl 2 , Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Multiple Bonds and Bond Angles

• Double and triple bonds place greater electron density on one side of the central atom than do single bonds.

• Therefore, they also affect bond angles.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Tetrahedral Electron Domain

• There are three molecular geometries:  Tetrahedral, if all are bonding pairs  Trigonal pyramidal if one is a nonbonding pair  Bent if there are two nonbonding pairs Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Trigonal Bipyramidal Electron Domain

• There are two distinct positions in this geometry:  Axial  Equatorial Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Trigonal Bipyramidal Electron Domain

Lower-energy conformations result from having nonbonding electron pairs in equatorial, rather than axial, positions in this geometry.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Trigonal Bipyramidal Electron Domain

• There are four distinct molecular geometries in this domain:  Trigonal bipyramidal  Seesaw  T-shaped  Linear Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Octahedral Electron Domain

• All positions are equivalent in the octahedral domain.

• There are three molecular geometries:  Octahedral  Square pyramidal  Square planar Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.2

Molecular Geometries of Molecules with Expanded Valence Shells

Use the VSEPR model to predict the molecular geometry of

(a)

SF 4 ,

(b)

IF 5 .

Solve: (a)

The Lewis structure for SF 4 is The sulfur has five electron domains around it: four from the S—F bonds and one from the nonbonding pair. Each domain points toward a vertex of a trigonal bipyramid. The domain from the nonbonding pair will point toward an equatorial position. The four bonds point toward the remaining four positions, resulting in a molecular geometry that is described as seesaw-shaped: Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.2

continued

(b)

The Lewis structure of IF 5 is (There are three lone pairs on each

of the F atoms, but they are not

shown.) The iodine has six electron domains around it, one of which is from a nonbonding pair. The electron-domain geometry is therefore octahedral, with one position occupied by the nonbonding electron pair. The resulting molecular geometry is therefore

square pyramidal

( Table 9.3

): Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.2

continued

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Predict the electron-domain geometry and molecular geometry of

(a)

ICl 4 – .

ClF 3 ,

(b) Answers: (a)

trigonal bipyramidal, T-shaped;

(b)

octahedral, square planar Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Larger Molecules

In larger molecules, it makes more sense to talk about the geometry about a particular atom rather than the geometry of the molecule as a whole.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Larger Molecules

This approach makes sense, especially because larger molecules tend to react at a particular site in the molecule.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.3

Predicting Bond Angles

Eyedrops for dry eyes usually contain a water-soluble polymer called

poly(vinyl alcohol),

which is based on the unstable organic molecule called

vinyl alcohol

: Predict the approximate values for the H—O—C and O—C—C bond angles in vinyl alcohol.

Solution Analyze:

We are given a molecular structure and asked to determine two bond angles in the structure.

Plan:

To predict a particular bond angle, we consider the middle atom of the angle and determine the number of electron domains surrounding that atom. The ideal angle corresponds to the electron-domain geometry around the atom. The angle will be compressed somewhat by nonbonding electrons or multiple bonds.

Solve:

For the H—O—C bond angle, there are four electron domains around the middle O atom (two bonding and two nonbonding). The electron-domain geometry around O is therefore tetrahedral, which gives an ideal angle of 109.5

° . The H—O—C angle will be compressed somewhat by the nonbonding pairs, so we expect this angle to be slightly less than 109.5

° .

To predict the O—C—C bond angle, we must examine the leftmost C atom, which is the central atom for this angle. There are three atoms bonded to this C atom and no nonbonding pairs, and so it has three electron domains about it. The predicted electron-domain geometry is trigonal planar, resulting in an ideal bond angle of 120 ° . Because of the larger size of the domain, however, the O—C—C bond angle should be slightly greater than 120 ° .

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.3

continued

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Predict the H—C—H and C—C—C bond angles in the following molecule, called

propyne

:

Answers:

109.5

° , 180 ° Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Polarity

• In Chapter 8 we discussed bond dipoles.

• But just because a molecule possesses polar bonds does not mean the molecule

as a whole

will be polar.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Polarity

By adding the individual bond dipoles, one can determine the overall dipole moment for the molecule.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Polarity

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.4

Polarity of Molecules

Predict whether the following molecules are polar or nonpolar:

(a)

BrCl,

(b)

SO 2 ,

(c)

SF 6 .

Solution Analyze:

We are given the molecular formulas of several substances and asked to predict whether the molecules are polar.

Plan:

If the molecule contains only two atoms, it will be polar if the atoms differ in electronegativity. If it contains three or more atoms, its polarity depends on both its molecular geometry and the polarity of its bonds. Thus, we must draw a Lewis structure for each molecule containing three or more atoms and determine its molecular geometry. We then use the relative electronegativities of the atoms in each bond to determine the direction of the bond dipoles. Finally, we see if the bond dipoles cancel each other to give a nonpolar molecule or reinforce each other to give a polar one.

Solve: (a)

Chlorine is more electronegative than bromine. All diatomic molecules with polar bonds are polar molecules. Consequently, BrCl will be polar, with chlorine carrying the partial negative charge: The actual dipole moment of BrCl, as determined by experimental measurement, is

µ

= 0.57 D.

(b)

Because oxygen is more electronegative than sulfur, SO 2 written for SO 2 : has polar bonds. Three resonance forms can be Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.4

continued For each of these, the VSEPR model predicts a bent geometry. Because the molecule is bent, the bond dipoles do not cancel and the molecule is polar: Experimentally, the dipole moment of SO 2 is

µ

= 1.63 D.

(c)

Fluorine is more electronegative than sulfur, so the bond dipoles point toward fluorine. The six S—F bonds are arranged octahedrally around the central sulfur: Because the octahedral geometry is symmetrical, the bond dipoles cancel, and the molecule is nonpolar, meaning that

µ

= 0.

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Determine whether the following molecules are polar or nonpolar:

(a)

NF 3 ,

(b)

BCl 3 .

Answers: (a)

polar because polar bonds are arranged in a trigonal-pyramidal geometry,

(b)

nonpolar because polar bonds are arranged in a trigonal-planar geometry Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Overlap and Bonding

• We think of covalent bonds forming through the sharing of electrons by adjacent atoms.

• In such an approach this can only occur when orbitals on the two atoms overlap.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Overlap and Bonding

• Increased overlap brings the electrons and nuclei closer together while simultaneously decreasing electron electron repulsion.

• However, if atoms get too close, the internuclear repulsion greatly raises the energy.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

But it’s hard to imagine tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal, and other geometries arising from the atomic orbitals we recognize.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

• Consider beryllium:  In its ground electronic state, it would not be able to form bonds because it has no singly-occupied orbitals.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

But if it absorbs the small amount of energy needed to promote an electron from the 2

s

to the 2

p

orbital, it can form two bonds.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

• Mixing the

s

and

p

orbitals yields two degenerate orbitals that are hybrids of the two orbitals.

 These

sp

hybrid orbitals have two lobes like a

p

orbital.

 One of the lobes is larger and more rounded as is the

s

orbital.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

• These two degenerate orbitals would align themselves 180  from each other.

• This is consistent with the observed geometry of beryllium compounds: linear.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

• With hybrid orbitals the orbital diagram for beryllium would look like this.

• The

sp

orbitals are higher in energy than the 1

s

orbital but lower than the 2

p

.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

Using a similar model for boron leads to… Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

…three degenerate

sp 2

orbitals.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

With carbon we get… Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

…four degenerate

sp 3

orbitals.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

For geometries involving expanded octets on the central atom, we must use our hybrids.

d

orbitals in Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

This leads to five degenerate

sp 3 d

orbitals… …or six degenerate

sp 3 d 2

orbitals.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Hybrid Orbitals

Once you know the electron-domain geometry, you know the hybridization state of the atom.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.5

Hybridization

Indicate the hybridization of orbitals employed by the central atom in

(a)

NH 2 – ,

(b)

9.2).

SF 4 (see Sample Exercise

Solution Analyze:

We are given two chemical formulas—one for a polyatomic anion and one for a molecular compound—and asked to describe the type of hybrid orbitals surrounding the central atom in each case.

Plan:

To determine the hybrid orbitals used by an atom in bonding, we must know the electron-domain geometry around the atom. Thus, we first draw the Lewis structure to determine the number of electron domains around the central atom. The hybridization conforms to the number and geometry of electron domains around the central atom as predicted by the VSEPR model.

Solve: (a)

The Lewis structure of NH 2 – is Because there are four electron domains around N, the electron-domain geometry is tetrahedral. The hybridization that gives a tetrahedral electron-domain geometry is

sp

3 ( Table 9.4

). Two of the

sp

3 hybrid orbitals contain nonbonding pairs of electrons, and the other two are used to make two-electron bonds with the hydrogen atoms.

(b)

The Lewis structure and electron-domain geometry of SF 4 are shown in Sample Exercise 9.2. There are five electron domains around S, giving rise to a trigonal-bipyramidal electron-domain geometry. With an expanded octet of ten electrons, a

d

orbital on the sulfur must be used. The trigonal-bipyramidal electron-domain

geometry corresponds to

sp

3

d

hybridization (

Table 9.4

). One of the hybrid orbitals that points in an equatorial

direction contains a nonbonding pair of electrons; the other four are used to form the S—F bonds.

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Predict the electron-domain geometry and the hybridization of the central atom in

(a)

SO 3 2– ,

(b) Answers: (a)

tetrahedral,

sp

3 ;

(b)

octahedral,

sp

3

d

2 SF 6 .

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Valence Bond Theory • Hybridization is a major player in this approach to bonding.

• There are two ways orbitals can overlap to form bonds between atoms.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Sigma (

) Bonds

• Sigma bonds are characterized by  Head-to-head overlap.

 Cylindrical symmetry of electron density about the internuclear axis.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Pi (

) Bonds

• Pi bonds are characterized by  Side-to-side overlap.

 Electron density above and below the internuclear axis.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Single Bonds

Single bonds are always  bonds, because  overlap is greater, resulting in a stronger bond and more energy lowering.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Multiple Bonds

In a multiple bond one of the bonds is a  and the rest are  bonds.

bond Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Multiple Bonds

• In a molecule like formaldehyde (shown at left) an

sp 2

orbital on carbon overlaps in  fashion with the corresponding orbital on the oxygen.

• The unhybridized

p

orbitals overlap in  fashion.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Multiple Bonds

In triple bonds, as in acetylene, two

sp

orbitals form a  bond between the carbons, and two pairs of

p

overlap in orbitals  fashion to form the two  bonds.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.6

Describing

and

Bonds in a Molecule

Formaldehyde has the Lewis structure Describe how the bonds in formaldehyde are formed in terms of overlaps of appropriate hybridized and unhybridized orbitals.

Solution Analyze: Plan:

We are asked to describe the bonding in formaldehyde in terms of orbital overlaps.

Single bonds will be of the  type, whereas double bonds will consist of one  bond and one  bond. The ways in which these bonds form can be deduced from the geometry of the molecule, which we predict using the VSEPR model.

Solve:

The C atom has three electron domains around it, which suggests a trigonal-planar geometry with bond angles of about 120 ° . This geometry implies

sp

2 make the two C—H and one C—O 

hybrid orbitals on C ( Table 9.4

). These hybrids are used to

bonds to C. There remains an unhybridized 2

p

orbital on carbon, perpendicular to the plane of the three

sp

2 hybrids.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.6

continued The O atom also has three electron domains around it, and so we will assume that it has

sp

2 well. One of these hybrids participates in the C—O  hybridization as bond, while the other two hybrids hold the two nonbonding electron pairs of the O atom. Like the C atom, therefore, the O atom has an unhybridized 2

p

orbital that is perpendicular to the plane of the molecule. The unhybridized 2

p

form a C—O

π

bond, as illustrated in Figure 9.27.

orbitals on the C and O atoms overlap to

Figure 9.27 Formation of

and

bonds in formaldehyde, H 2 CO.

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Consider the acetonitrile molecule:

(a) (c)

Predict the bond angles around each carbon atom;

(b)

determine the total number of  and  bonds in the molecule.

Answers: (a)

two

π

bonds approximately 109 ° around the left C and 180 ° on the right C; (b) sp 3 , sp; (c) five  Geometries

Delocalized Electrons: Resonance

When writing Lewis structures for species like the nitrate ion, we draw resonance structures to more accurately reflect the structure of the molecule or ion.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Delocalized Electrons: Resonance

• In reality, each of the four atoms in the nitrate ion has a

p

orbital.

• The

p

orbitals on all three oxygens overlap with the

p

orbital on the central nitrogen.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Delocalized Electrons: Resonance

This means the  electrons are not localized between the nitrogen and one of the oxygens, but rather are delocalized throughout the ion.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Resonance

The organic molecule benzene has six  bonds and a

p

orbital on each carbon atom.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Resonance

• In reality the  electrons in benzene are not localized, but delocalized.

• The even distribution of the  electrons in benzene makes the molecule unusually stable.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.7

Delocalized Bonding

Describe the bonding in the nitrate ion, NO 3 – . Does this ion have delocalized  bonds?

Solution Analyze:

Given the chemical formula for a polyatomic anion, we are asked to describe the bonding and determine whether the ion has delocalized  bonds.

Plan:

Our first step in describing the bonding in NO 3 – is to construct appropriate Lewis structures. If there are multiple resonance structures that involve the placement of the double bonds in different locations, that suggests that the  component of the double bonds is delocalized.

Solve:

In Section 8.6 we saw that NO 3 – has three resonance structures: In each of these structures the electron-domain geometry at nitrogen is trigonal planar, which implies

sp

2 hybridization of the N atom. The

sp

2 hybrid orbitals are used to construct the three N—O  bonds that are present in each of the resonance structures.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.7

continued The unhybridized 2

p

orbital on the N atom can be used to make  structures shown, we might imagine a single localized N––O  bonds. For any one of the three resonance bond formed by the overlap of the unhybridized 2

p

orbital on N and a 2

p

orbital on one of the O atoms, as shown in Figure 9.30(a). Because each resonance structure contributes equally to the observed structure of NO 3 – , however, we represent the  bonding as spread out, or delocalized, over the three N—O bonds, as shown in Figure 9.30(b).

Figure 9.30

Localized and delocalized

bonds in NO 3 – .

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

SAMPLE EXERCISE 9.7

continued

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Which of the following molecules or ions will exhibit delocalized bonding: SO 3 , SO 3 2– , H 2 CO, O 3 , NH 4 + ?

Answer:

SO 3 and O 3 , as indicated by the presence of two or more resonance structures involving each of these molecules  bonding for Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Molecular Orbital (MO) Theory

Though valence bond theory effectively conveys most observed properties of ions and molecules, there are some concepts better represented by molecular orbitals. Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Molecular Orbital (MO) Theory

• In MO theory, we invoke the wave nature of electrons.

• If waves interact constructively, the resulting orbital is lower in energy: a bonding molecular orbital.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Molecular Orbital (MO) Theory

If waves interact destructively, the resulting orbital is higher in energy: an antibonding molecular orbital.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

MO Theory

• In H 2 the two electrons go into the bonding molecular orbital.

• The bond order is one half the difference between the number of bonding and antibonding electrons.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

MO Theory

For hydrogen, with two electrons in the bonding MO and none in the antibonding MO, the bond order is 1 2 (2 - 0) = 1 Molecular Geometries and Bonding

MO Theory

• In the case of He 2 , the bond order would be 1 2 (2 - 2) = 0 • Therefore, He 2 does not exist.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

MO Theory

• For atoms with both

s

and

p

orbitals, there are two types of interactions:  The

s

and the

p

orbitals that face each other overlap in  fashion.

 The other two sets of

p

orbitals overlap in  fashion.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

MO Theory

• The resulting MO diagram looks like this.

• There are both  and  bonding molecular orbitals and  * and  * antibonding molecular orbitals.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

MO Theory

• The smaller

p

-block elements in the second period have a sizeable interaction between the

s

and

p

orbitals.

• This flips the order of the s and p molecular orbitals in these elements.

Molecular Geometries and Bonding

Second-Row MO Diagrams

Molecular Geometries and Bonding