Transcript Slide 1
Governor’s Proposals for the 2013-14 State Budget and K-12 Education Presented to the TRUSD Board of Trustees January 29, 2013 Rob Ball Associate Superintendent Business Support Services Kate Ingersoll Executive Director Fiscal Services Education Receives More . . . For the first time in five years - an increase in funding Revenue limit deficit still more than 20% The Governor continues to deal with the “wall of debt” Proposition 98 guarantee could grow at 3.4% to 5.3% rate over the next several years Other forecasts have proven to be overly optimistic Manipulations of Proposition 98 could strangle education funding Glory years funded by highly educated workforce Distribution Method is Different Slightly higher funding – New method of distribution – the LCFF Revenue limits and categorical programs are replaced by base grants and supplemental grants over a phase-in period The stated goal is to focus more resources on California’s most needy students State Budget Reserve General Fund Reserve Enacted Budget vs. Final Reserve (in millions) $2,000 $1,000 $971 $500 $1,205 $543 $1,018 $948 $167 $0 ? ($1,000) ($2,000) ($1,976) ($3,000) ($4,000) ($5,000) ($3,601) ($4,458) ($6,000) ($7,000) 2008-09 ($6,842) 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Forecast Enacted Budget Final Reserves One Year Later Per-ADA Revenue Volatility Per-ADA Revenue Change 15% 10% Average 1.5% 5% 0% 0% -5% -10% -15% 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Proposition 98 Major Proposition 98 budget changes for K-12 education include: $1.8 billion to reduce interyear deferrals to $5.6 billion $1.6 billion to begin implementation of LCFF for school districts $400.5 million to support energy efficiency projects in schools from Proposition 39 revenues $100 million increase for the K-12 Mandate Block Grant to fund the Science Graduation Requirement and Behavioral Intervention Plan mandates $62.8 million for a 1.65% COLA for selected categorical programs $48.5 million for charter school ADA growth Revenue Limits The Governor’s Budget makes no reference to current law and revenue limit funding There is no direct reference to the statutory COLA Provides a 1.65% COLA for selected categorical programs and sufficient funding to increase support for LEAs by 4.5% under the LCFF There is no reference to the current 22.272% deficit factor Nevertheless, until state law is changed, revenue limits are the means by which state apportionment aid is distributed to LEAs statewide 2013-14 Revenue Limit Factors District Type Elementary High School Unified Statutory COLA 2013-14 2012-13 1.65% 3.24% (actual) (estimated) $202 $106 $243 $128 $212 $111 3-9 199 4 4-9 199 5 5-9 199 6 6-9 199 7 7-9 199 8 8-9 199 9 9-0 200 0 0-0 200 1 1-0 200 2 2-0 200 3 3-0 200 4 4-0 200 5 5-0 200 6 6-0 200 7 7-0 200 8 8-0 200 9 9-1 201 0 0-1 201 1 1-1 201 2 2-1 201 3 3-1 4 199 5% 0.000% 7.884% 2.143% 0.892% 0.000% 8.801% 8.801% 8.801% 6.995% 3.002% 0.000% 0.000% 10% 11.010% 10.120% 25% 30% 22.272% 22.272% 17.963% 20.602% 18.355% 20% 0.000% 15% 8.140% Revenue Limit Deficit Factors 35% 0% Base Revenue Limit After Deficit Factor at TRUSD Base Revenue Limit History $8,000 $7,653 $7,542 $7,500 Base Revenue Limit $7,212 $7,187 $7,330 $6,950 $7,000 $6,621 $5,331 $6,405 $6,500 $6,000 $5,635 $5,896 Funded Base Revenue Limit $5,819 $5,862 $5,948 $5,500 $5,000 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Apportionment Deferrals $1.8 billion in 2013-14 to further reverse the interyear K-12 apportionment deferrals that were implemented before and during the economic downturn beginning in 2008-09 During the peak of the downturn, approximately 45% of state aid payments owed to school districts were deferred to the following year This deferral buy down is a one-time expenditure and does not impose a similar cost on the state in subsequent years For 2012-13, the state reduced K-12 deferrals by $2.2 billion At the end of 2013-14, the Governor’s Budget estimates that $5.6 billion in deferrals will remain Local Control Funding Formula Governor Brown is again proposing a major overhaul of California’s system of school finance California’s current school finance system is “overly complex, administratively costly, and inequitably distributed” The Governor proposes a sweeping reform of the state’s school finance system with the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) Sufficient funding to increase support for LEAs by 4.5% under the LCFF In 2013-14, the deficit factor would remain unchanged at 22.272% Major LCFF Elements The LCFF would replace revenue limits and most categorical program funding Funding would generally be flexible Elements of the proposed formula A base grant target equal to the undeficited statewide average base revenue limit per ADA – $6,816 (includes the 1.65% COLA) Added funding for K-3 Class-Size Reduction (CSR) and 9-12 Career Technical Education (CTE) Major LCFF Elements Additional funding based on the demographics of the schools, including: English Learner population Pupils eligible for free and reduced-price meals Foster youth These additional amounts will be calculated as 35% of the base grant times the number of eligible students Concentration grant for 35% of the grade span base grant multiplied by the districtwide % eligible students that exceed 50% of total enrollment LCFF Grade Spans Factors K-3 4-6 7-8 9-12 Grade Span Base Grant per ADA $6,342 $6,437 $6,628 $7,680 Adjustment factors 11.2% CSR -- -- 2.8% CTE CSR, CTE amounts $710 -- -- $215 LCFF and Categorical Programs Other elements of the formula: Transportation and Targeted Instructional Improvement Grant (TIIG) funding continue as add-ons to the formula for those school districts that currently receive funding through these programs Special Education, Child Nutrition, QEIA, After School Education and Safety, and other federally mandated programs are not included in the formula And the funds can be used for any educational purpose Timeline: Phased in over seven years – completed in 2020-21 Federal Fiscal Cliff “Fiscal Cliff” put in a much better perspective U.S. tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000 Federal budget: $3,820,000,000,000 New debt: $1,650,000,000,000 National debt: $14,271,000,000,000 Recent budget cuts: $38,500,000,000 Let’s now remove 8 zeros and pretend it’s a household budget: Annual family income: $21,700 Money the family spent: $38,200 New debt on the credit card: $16,500 Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710 Total budget cuts so far: $38.50 Source: Anonymous