Transcript Document
Education Leaders Conference
Using Data to Improve
Instruction:
Building on Models that Work
Council of Chief State School Officers
St. Louis
September 12-14, 2007
Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
Tools for Aligning Instruction, Standards,
& Assessments
Orientation for Educators
Conference Objectives
Present & discuss: Strategies/designs/tools for
using data to improve instruction– that have been
applied with schools
Analyze findings/evidence about effectiveness of
strategies/designs/tools, and discuss potential as
model for others
Provide leadership training on how to implement
and use data-driven approaches for improving
instruction
Panel of State Leaders: Policy to
Practice Question—
How can States effectively integrate
Education Improvement Initiatives
with Use of Data?
PANEL
Gene Wilhoit, CCSSO Executive Director, (Facilitator)
Gerald Zahorchak, Pennsylvania Secretary of Education
Susan Castillo, Oregon Superintendent of Education
Todd Flaherty, Rhode Island Department of Education
Sally Wherry, Minnesota Department of Education
New members: Session topics
What is SEC? Why? How? -- RB
What Collaborative does; Tools --RB
How to use SEC data charts– Carolyn
Karatzas
How to plan an SEC project – Diana
Nunnaley
SEC online survey system/alignment –
John Smithson
New Member Orientation
What? … are the Survey of Enacted
Curriculum tools?
How?… are data collected, analyzed,
reported?
Why?… are SEC data useful to educators,
leaders, researchers?
Now what?…how do we implement locally
and lead the use of SEC in schools?
STATE of
MissourA
MissourEE
Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
SEC State Collaborative
Members Planning Meeting
St. Louis
September 11, 2007
Rationale
Standards
Assessment
Curriculum
Applications
Alignment analysis --instruction, standards,
assessments
Instructional improvement in schools
Needs assessment/ Evaluation
Indicators – monitoring change over time
Multi-State Collaborative
Build Knowledge of leaders
Share Strategies
Produce joint products, tools
SEC Collaborative Members
2007-08
•Delaware
•Idaho
•Illinois
•Indiana
•Iowa
•Kansas
•Maine
•Michigan
•Mississippi
• Montana
• Ohio
• Oklahoma
• Oregon
• Wisconsin
• Vermont*
• Minnesota*
Social Studies SEC Development
2005-2007
• Arizona
• Delaware
• Idaho
• Maine
•Ohio
•Oregon
•Vermont
•Wisconsin
• Minnesota
• Nevada
•U of Wis-WCER
• NCSS
• Civics Education
•National Geographic
•GENIP
•NCEE
•CCSSO
SEC Collaborating Organizations
•Council of Chief State School Officers
www.SECsurvey.org
•Wisconsin Center for Education
Research www.SEConline.org
•Learning Point Associates/NCREL
www.SECsupport.org
•TERC Regional Alliance DEC Project
www.ra.terc.edu/DEC
SEC Collaborative offers
Core Components of SEC tools/services
1) Surveys with teachers – report instruction
2) Alignment analysis – content code standards
and assessments
3) How to use Data – knowledge, skills
4) Leader development – 2-3 meetings/yr
4) In-state workshops: a) orientation
b) use of data
SEC Collaborative
States, Districts
CCSSO – SEC Collaborative Management
Rolf Blank, Carlise Smith
WCER – Surveys, Reporting, Alignment analysis
John Smithson, Alissa Minor, Eric Osthoff
Training & Technical Assistance
Carolyn Karatzas, Consultant, CCSSO
Diana Nunnaley, TERC
Gary Money, Maren Harris, Learning Point Associates
Lani Seikaly, Hillstreet & Main
Jennifer Unger, The Groupworks
Michael Erhlinghaus, Measured Progress
SEC by the Numbers: ’06-07
10,393 SEC Surveys 06-07
4674 Math
1993 Science
3646 ELAR
80 Soc Stud
131 Standards/Assess. Content
analysis
1000 est. schools--Data use
SEC by the Numbers (2)
• By Comparison
1996 207
1999
626
2005 5,414
2006 10,200
2007 10,400
•
Science Teachers (5 states)
M/S Teachers (11 states)
E, M, S teachers
E, M, S teachers
E, M, S, SSt (27 states)
SEC Collaborative
How SEC Collaborative works for members
Training and Assistance to project leaders
Project Planning w/ budget– meet local objectives
Each state/district makes decisions on services &
project plan
Multi-state benefits of collaborative
e.g., learning from experience, sharing ideas, training
Accomplishments
06-07
SEC Collaborative
In-state
Leader workshops, Project Planning
PPTs for Orientation, Survey Admin, Data
use
Leader Development Standards document
Website revisions, improvements
(SECsurvey.org; SEConline.org)
E.g., State Projects, All Alignment results,
Report generator
More Accomplishments
SEC Collaborative
“Using Data to Improve Instruction” Boulder, CO
conference – 200 leaders, 32 sessions (30 states)
Social Studies Survey development –
10 states, 5 prof. orgs.,
NAEP Alignment analysis – 2007 Math items
Research/evaluation:
MSP study of professional development– multi-site study
Ohio case study of district/school implementation of SEC
Follow-up data tool –to track school level data
Validity study—longitudinal data for teachers and students
Ohio reading study
John demonstrated SEC comparisons in Feb 07
Goals SEC 06-07
State/local projects—From pilots to broad
application, local leadership training
Integrate SEC tools/data with Improvement
Initiatives, especially data-driven
Research/Evaluation --Broader use of Surveys,
Alignment
Assist States in planning with Service delivery
agencies; SEC team with CACs & Labs
Social Studies SEC complete & implement
Key Question -- SEC Tools
Research into Practice
How can Educators obtain reliable, valid data
to determine Alignment of instruction with
required standards and assessments?
Survey Sections
• School & Class Description
• Instructional Activities
• General
• Problem Solving Activities
• Pairs & Small Group Work
• Use of Hands-on Materials
• Use of Calculators/Computers &
other Ed. Tech.
• Assessment Use
• Instructional Influences
• Instructional Readiness
• Teacher Opinions
• Professional Development
• Types, Frequency
• Content , Active,
• Collegial, Coherence
• Instructional Content
•Topic x Cog. Demand
Steps in SEC Development
R&D studies curriculum-- Early ‘90s
Models:TIMSS, NAEP, Analyze assessment
OTL interest of States, Porter/ Smithson research,
CCSSO Science Assessment project
State collaborative –Develop surveys-’98-’01 (NSF)
11-State field study, Reports, Alignment, USI
Use of data experiment – DEC (NSF/ROLE:‘01-04)
Evaluation: MSP RETA PD Study (‘02 – 05, NSF)
English/ Language Arts survey (‘03 – 04)
Current projects: 15 States, 4 Districts, 5 MSPs
Questions Addressed by SEC Data
How can in-depth data on content of instruction be
collected and reported–not topic checklists, to
analyze teaching content in relation to standards,
assessments, achievement?
How can methods of teaching practices be
compared across classrooms, schools, districts,
and states?
How can enacted curriculum data be reported in a
manner to encourage use by teachers to improve
instruction?
MSP PD Study Sites
Brockport/Rochester – SUNY
Cleveland Municipal SD
Corpus Christi – AIMS - TX A&M
El Paso – UTEP
State MSPs: ID, IL, OR, OK, ME, MT
NSF MSPs: Boston
NJ MSP -- 12 districts
NC MSP -- 17 districts
SW PA MSP
SCALE – Los Angeles
Key Education Questions
(cont’d)
How can we measure the effects of standardsbased initiatives on instructional practices and
curriculum in classrooms?
How can we analyze effectiveness of professional
development on changes in teachers’ instructional
practices? (i.e. determine the quality of
professional development)
What if…
[for Intro of SEC to Educators]
You could use data on instructional quality and
content to guide professional development?
You
could have consistency across grade levels?
You
could know how well aligned your state
standards were to the state assessment?
You
could compare how you teach content
compared to how others across the nation teach?
You
could use anonymous teacher data to start a
powerful school discussion about what the teacher
needs are?
SEC Instructional Content
Uses a multi- dimensional la nguage for
describing instructional content
Topics
by
Cognitive Demand
(Expectations for Student Learning)
Content Matrix
Categories of Cognitive Demand
Memorize
Topics
Multiple
Step
Equations
Inequalities
Literal
Equations
Lines /
Slope and
Intercept
Operations
on
Polynomials
Quadratic
Equations
Peform
Procedures
Communicate
Understanding
Sovle nonroutine
problems
Conjecture/
Generalize/
Prove
Science content matrix
Categories of Cognitive Demand
Topics
Nature of
Science
Meas/Calc.
in Science
Life Science
Physical
Science
Earth
Science
Chem/Biol/
Physics
(HS)
Memorize
facts,
defintions
Conduct
Communicate
Analzye
Invest/ Perf Understanding information
Procedures of sci concepts
Apply
concepts/
Connnect
Content Maps
State J Grade 8
Mathematics Instruction
Number Sense
Operations
Measurement
Algebraic Concepts
Geometric Concepts
Data Analysis
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
Instructional Technology
Memorize Communicate Connect
Perform
Conjecture
Memorize
Communicate
Connect
Perform
Conjecture
Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
The intended
curriculum:
State content
standards—
What students
should learn
A neutral content grid
The assessed
curriculum:
State (and other)
assessments—
tested learning
with cognitive demand
The enacted
curriculum:
What teachers
teach
The learned
curriculum:
Student outcomes
based on school
learning
The Enacted Curriculum
SEC Websites
CCSSO, SEC Collaborative
www.SECsurvey.org
WCER, SEC Online Survey and Reports
www.SEConline.org