Transcript Acceleration Scenarios for the Muon Collider

What do we need ?
Sub-Component
Status
Proton Driver
Can we build it?
ok
Risk
Save money?
moderate
Make it easier?
yes
yes
less intensity
longer bunches
power on target
moderate
yes
Cost driver
(investment )
Responsible person
for the chapter in
the report
Weirren Chou
Target
not ok
high
Decay channel +  rot
no
not ok
high
no back off in present
design
yes
may be
ok
low
no for this design
no
Kaplan
LeBrun
Holtkamp
LBNL
LLNL
Neuffer
mini cooling
(factor of 3)
outside expertise
-SNS ? Tony Gabriel
S.Childress
Neuffer
less intensity
(3 m LH2)
2nd -rotation
yes
not ok
(induct) linac
capture
may be
not ok
mainly rf problem
not ok
cooling
(factor of 50)
very high
only in exchange with low
frequ. RF
moderate
high
yes
high
no (a little)
lower Frequ. rf
no (a little)
yes
Kaplan,
Lebrun,
moderate
lower Frequ. rf
no
moderate
CEBAF/ Cornell
Court Bohn
½ ok
yes
moderate
no
yes
Storage Ring
ok
yes
moderate
no
compromise flux
yes
CEBAF
Cornell
Court Bohn
Finley,
Diagnostic
not ok
moderate
no
no
?
st
1 stage linac
together with next row
(RLAS)
RLA’s
mainly rf problem
½ ok
yes
What do we need
Summary of the people
comment
High power RF
systems
Target
only with Oak Ridge
on board
editor
????
Childress
Safety
FESS
CIVIL Eng.
Finley
Finley
Magnets storage
ring & RLA arcs
induction linacs
Power supplies
????
???
Holtkamp
Wolff
Power/cooling
General Facilities
Cryogenics
Plant
Solenoids
Tollestrup
Theilacker
Reid
Wildman
+ rf suport
S. Childress
+ target support
Coulson
Sims
Laughton
+ drawing
support
Technical Div.
+ ??
EE/Wolff
+ support
support
Duane Plant
Theilacker
+ ???
IHEP Protvino
Tech Division