Transcript Slide 1

Tri State Diversity Conference
February 4-5, 2010
“Keeping it Real” : Homophobia Affects Everyone
Presented by: Tracey DuEst, M.Ed
Program Director, DISCO
From girls confronting popular messages about culture
and body image to boys who are sexually active just to
prove they aren't gay, the students in Straightlaced
illustrate the toll that deeply held stereotypes and rigid
gender policing have on all of our lives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN5rPAAhSxU
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Problem: Hostile School Climate


Schools nationwide are unsafe environments for a
distressing majority of LGBT students who continue to
face harassment and even physical assault, often
without intervention from school staff.
9 out of 10 students report hearing biased language in
their schools, most commonly anti- LGBT remarks.
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Problem: Hostile School Climate



Nearly nine- tenths of students (86.2%) reported being verbally
harassed (e.g., called names or threatened) at school because of
their sexual orientation. And two- thirds (66.5%) of students were
verbally harassed because of their gender expression.
Almost half (44.1%) of students had been physically harassed (e.g.,
pushed or shoved) at school in the past year because of their sexual
orientation and three in ten students (30.4%) because of their
gender expression.
For some, victimization was even more severe – 22.1% reported
being physically assaulted (e.g., punched, kicked or injured with a
weapon) because of their sexual orientation and 14.2% because of
their gender expression.
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Problem: Hostile School Climate

The majority (60.8%) of students who were harassed or assaulted in
school did not report the incident to school staff, believing little or no
action would be taken or the situation could become worse if
reported. In fact, nearly a third (31.1%) of the students who did
report an incident said that school staff did nothing in response.
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Problem: Absenteeism
 Many
LGBT students are forced to miss class or entire days of
school rather than face a hostile environment where they
experience continual harassment. These students are being
denied their right to an education.
 31.7% of LGBT students missed a class because of feeling
unsafe, compared to only 5.5% of a national sample of
secondary school students.
 32.7% of LGBT students missed a day of school because of
feeling unsafe, compared to only 4.5% of a national sample of
secondary school students.
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Problem: Absenteeism
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Problem: Absenteeism
Female Student,
12th Grade, MD
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Problem: Lowered Educational Aspirations

Students cannot succeed in school when they do not feel safe. The
incidence of in-school victimization experienced by LGBT students
hinders their academic success and educational aspirations.
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
What are the top three issues that students who have
a different sexual orientation are faced with?







Top three issues = harassment; “sin”; bias
Safe forum to deal with their feelings – both sexual feelings and feelings of acceptance in a
group.
Discrimination based on fear – that somehow the sexual orientation makes them sexually
deviant and a threat to other children.
Lack of role models in schools to help navigate the world from a position of
minority/oppression/difference.
Bullying/ teasing.
Having to keep secrets - trying to figure out who is "safe" to talk to (students and teachers). At
our school, there is an informal "underground network" of safe people. We know who we are... I
just hope all of the gay kids do, too.
They struggle to come out to their families and be accepted once they do, and then have the
same struggle with their peers and probably teachers too.

Some are teased for appearing too masculine or too feminine.

Prom, dating etc.
What are the top three concerns/fears that come up for you,
the district and/or the board when it comes to dealing with
sexual education?




The general community attitude toward LGBT is perceived to be discriminatory; how do
you approach a board that has several members who have known religious
fundamentalist views; will I lose my job if I advocate too strongly?
Ignorance in public perception that race/ethnicity and poverty are not choices for people and
homosexuality is – “they choose to be this way and they can choose not to… they made their
bed.”
Of the “isms” that we deal with in school, this is the only one that deals with sexuality- we don’t
talk about the sexuality of heterosexual students, so why do we have to talk about sexuality at
all? Keep it to yourself.
It remains a socially acceptable discrimination. It is okay to make gay jokes, make fun of
stereotypes, etc in social situations. People will and do still publicly celebrate their
homophobia. It feels unsafe for students to make it a public event. How would we protect them
from the public bashing that would be “ok” in the eyes of many adults both in and out of
school? It would never be okay to go to a board meeting to say you did not want your
children to go to school with black children. I would venture to guess that it would be likely
that there would be people at a board meeting opposing support of openly gay students.
What are the top three concerns/fears that come up for you,
the district and/or he board when it comes to dealing with
sexual education?





I have a particular concern for gay students who have deep commitment to their religious faith but can't
always reconcile their beliefs with their orientation because their church, synagogue or mosque teaches that
they need to change. It's sad to me that many end up abandoning/denying one or the other (faith or
orientation), when they can be BOTH gay and devoted to God in more inclusive communities of faith. Both
religion and orientation are taboo topics in the public schools.... so talking about either one, and especially
both, can be dangerous territory!
Trying to be supportive and inclusive without appearing to "recruit" students or "promote" a certain lifestyle,
especially in a very conservative community. There is a tendency for people to believe that any teacher who
is supportive of gay students must be gay too. Even though I am not gay I deliberately choose not to make
any attempt to clear up people's curiosity though, because I don't really care if they think I am gay... but it can
cause misunderstandings (and weird rumors that make the professional environment unwelcoming).
I'm frustrated by so many ignorant and homophobic comments and jokes that straight students (and
sometimes teachers) make on a daily basis, but I'm not always sure what I'm "allowed" to say in response...
legally, morally, and according to the values of the community I teach in. It makes me crazy sometimes when
I see other teachers and administrators not addressing the issue.
The district wants to embrace all minorities, but homosexuality is often left out of the equation, and it’s rarely
spoken of directly. It is still handled as though it’s taboo.
They are not represented in the curriculum much.
What if anything would make it easier for you to deal with
sexual orientation in your school district?





A friendly dialogue about the issues surrounding orientation with people of various perspectives... not to
change anyone's mind, but just to agree on what we can agree on (for example, that bullying is wrong, no
matter what you think about homosexuality). We have done this with some student groups, but I never
know if the information really "sticks with them" after they leave the assembly... I'd love to try a similar thing
with a group of teachers, administrators, and Board members.
Board and community acceptance of GLBT; administrators in school buildings who support GLBT; mandatory
DISC training for everyone who serves our students.
With our GSA, I’m told by my administration we have to have parental permission to show any videos and
some of our members feel it difficult to disclose their membership to their parents, even if their parents know
they are gay it causes difficulties when the issue is brought up. The videos are documentaries or interviews.
How do I comply with administration and expose my students to valuable videos without causing problems on
either front?
Tools, workshops etc., that can help school based teams with common language that elevates the
conversation beyond “sex”- relationships and feelings are so much more than sex. We operate in ignorance.
Knowledge is power.
If I knew what the district/building was willing to support and what they were willing to try to eliminate.
Solution: Gay- Straight Alliances


The presence of Gay- Straight Alliances (GSA’s) can create a more
welcoming climate for LGBT students and allies.
Students in schools with a Gay-Straight Alliance:
o Report hearing fewer homophobic remarks
o Experienced less harassment and assault because of their sexual
orientation and gender expression
o Were more likely to report incidents of harassment and assault
o Were less likely to feel unsafe because of their sexual orientation or
gender expression
o Were less likely to miss school because of safety concerns and
reported a greater sense of belonging to their school community
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Solution: Gay- Straight Alliances
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Solution: Supportive Educators


Supportive Educators can make a critical difference in the lives of LGBT
students.
Students with supportive educators (six or more):
o Were less likely to miss at least one day of school in the past
month because of safety reasons (20.4%) than students with no
supportive educators (39.8%)
o Had higher GPA’s than students without supportive educators (2.9
versus 2.5)
o Reported higher educational aspirations than those without
supportive educators
o Reported a greater sense of belonging to their school community
than those without supportive educators
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Solution: Supportive Educators
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Safe School Laws
Only 16 states and the District of Columbia (green and magenta in the map below) have
safe schools laws designed to protect students based on sexual orientation.
Only 12 states and
D.C. (green in the map)
have such laws to
protect students based
on sexual orientation
and gender identity/
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
expression.
What are Safe School Laws?


The first type is non- discrimination laws which
many states have passed to provide protection
from discrimination to LGBT students in schools.
The second type is fully enumerated anti- bullying
laws. These are laws that specifically prohibit
bullying and harassment of students based on
sexual orientation and gender identity/ expression.
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
Solution: Policy Review

School policies that directly address anti-LGBT bullying and harassment
can create better learning environments for LGBT students:
o Students heard fewer homophobic remarks (68.8% frequently or
often) compared to students in schools with generic, non-enumerated
policies (74.3%) or no policy (75.0%)
o Students experienced lower levels of victimization related to their
sexual orientation than students with generic policies or no policies at
all
o Students were more likely to report that school staff intervened most
of the time or always when hearing homophobic language in school
(29.1%) compared to students in schools with generic policies
(17.5%) or no policies (13.1%)
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
o Were more likely to
report incidents of
harassment and
assault to school staff
(18.7% reported most
of the time or always)
compared to students
in schools with generic
policies (13.7%) or no
policies at all (11.0%)
Source: GLSEN National School Climate Survey 2007, Executive Summary
HETEROSEXUAL QUESTIONNAIRE
•What do you think caused your heterosexuality?
•When and how did you first decide you were a heterosexual?
•Is it possible your heterosexuality is just a phase you might grow out of?
•If heterosexuality is normal, why are a disproportionate number of mental patients
heterosexuals?
•Your heterosexuality doesn’t offend me as long as you don’t try to force it on me. Why do you
people feel compelled to seduce others into your sexual orientation?
•The great majority of child molesters are heterosexuals. Do you really consider it safe to expose
your children to heterosexual teachers?
HETEROSEXUAL QUESTIONNAIRE Cont.
•Why do you insist on being so obvious and making a public spectacle of your heterosexuality?
Can’t you just be what you are and keep it quiet?
•With all the societal support marriage receives, the divorce rate is spiraling. Why are there so
few stable relationships among heterosexuals?
•A disproportionate number of criminals, welfare recipients, and other irresponsible or antisocial
types are heterosexual. Why would anyone want to hire a heterosexual for a responsible
position?
•Why are heterosexuals so promiscuous?
--Adapted from Martin Rochlin, Ph.D.
What are your overall reactions to these questions?
Which question(s) caused the greatest responses from you? Why?