Transcript TNO Presentation
Portal Soil and Subsoil
Robert Jan van Leeuwen en Matthijs Poelmans User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Three reasons
1.
Present portals do not perform (Q1 2009, DINO) 2.
The Key Register for the Subsurface demands a new portal (medio 2009, BRO) 3.
The Geologische Dienst van Nederland/Geological Survey of the Netherlands needs a look of its own (medio 2010, GDNL) User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
What type of websites are covered by the Geologische Dienst NL?
1.
A number of content websites (e.g.
geosites
) 2.
A special purpose site (
delfstoffenonline
) 3.
Two portals for data distribution (DINO
Loket
, NLOG) User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Content websites
• provides general information regarding the geological survey or sites of geological interest • user community: the public, those interested in the subsurface of the Netherlands, • website without functionality • specific look and feel • (content)management by third party User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Special purpose
www.delfstoffenonline.nl
• issuing specific information (sand/gravels for building purposes) • specifieke user community: extraction companies • website with specific functionality: viewer on the GIS-database of the DINO-system • specific look and feel • contentmanagement by DINO-ICT User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Two data portals
NLOG DINO
Loket
• • the portals have specific content the essential purpose is the distribution of a broad array of datatypes • each portal its own data • datacentric • user community: experts • each portal its own community • look and feel • each portal its own • both websites essentially the same functionality (view, download, order,…) on the DINO-database • contentmanagement by DINO DM (portalmanager) User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
1 Present portals do not perform
• technologically out of date • technically not maintainable • content not maintainable • not userfriendly (any more) • DINO
Loket
has a serious barrier (subscription) NLOG DINO
Loket
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Data portals: present situation
A DINO
Loket
B NLOG shallow DINO User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010 deep DINO
2 BRO demands a new portal
minimal requirements (1)
• General • user friendly • proven, modern technology (september 2009: Flex) • • maintainable without barrier • • • datacentric broad functionality user community: experts “BROLoket” • Specific • distribution of all types of BRO-data (one stop shop) • new look and feel • • new data new users User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
2 BRO demands a new portal
minimal requirements (2)
• New data • domain
Soils
• • • bijv. (more types of) sample analysis …
groundwater licences
fresh look and name • New users • e.g. soil experts • • municipalities and most of all more users, more use “BROLoket” high demands performance & usability User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
BROLoket: purpose situation
A,B,C,… BRO
Loket
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010 DINO BRO
… the other websites of Geologische Dienst NL
E
delfstoffenonline
D
Geosites
D
geologicalsurvey
GISdb User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
The many faces of the Geologische Dienst NL
A
DINO
Loket
B
NLOG D
D
A,B,C,… BRO
Loket
Geosites
E
delfstoffenonline geologicalsurvey
DINO DINO DINO BRO GISdb User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
… and a missing website
BRO
Loket
TT-GIP DINO BRO User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
3 The Geologische Dienst
aim: one face, many expressions
GDNL
New technology F D
Geologische Dienst
A,B,C,… BRO
Loket
E,..
Special purposes
TT-GIP
DINO BRO User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
3 GDNL &NLOG
becomes a content website
GDNL
New technology F D
Geologische Dienst
A,B,C,… BRO
Loket
NLOG F
TT-GIP
DINO BRO User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
A
GDNL: transition
D
B
Look & feel ...
Functionality .
D D A,B, C,… .
E,.
DINO BRO User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Input VROM and Alterra
• 20100630 Concept discussed with Joop Okx (Alterra) and Dirk van Barneveld (VROM) • Alterra, i.e. the “
STIBOKA” must have its place
in the system to secure the relation between soil maping and the • BRO blijft bestaan Consequence: replace the name GDNL by
Portal Soil and Subsurface/Portaal Bodem en Ondergrond
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Portal Soil and Subsurface
Distribution DINO BRO User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
1 Functionality and interaction
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010 DINO BRO
Rough design dataportal (1)
• May 2010 sessions with internal and external users to get input for the Rough Design (RD), with a.o.. • • • • • Fred Olie (Haskoning) Janco van Gelderen (Bodem en Grondwater Prov. Utrecht) Noortje Heijnen (IF Technologie) Vera Lagendijk (Vitens) Hermi Hagendijk (ATP) • The RD contains basic principles, boundary conditions and overall functionality for BROLoket • The RD is input for an interaction
model
available and how is it stuctured) (= what functionality is • The RD is input for the interaction
design
of functionality (= how does it work, e.g. the viewer) User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
2 Graphic design
DINO BRO The RD is input for BROLoket’s graphic design User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
3 Organisation
Uitgifte DINO BRO User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Organisation dataportal
• Interaction model and interaction design are translated into in Use Cases. Use cases describe all user operations and the response of the system. Examples: • • • what does an error message look like?
what checks performs the system regarding my input?
what happens when I click “return” ?
• Use Cases will be reviewed by users User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010