Transcript Slide 1
AN INTRODUCTION Tim Cordy, Project Secretariat: traffiQ, Frankfurt WHY PIMMS? WHY PIMMS? Partner Initiatives for the development of Mobility Management Services PIMMS: 2004-7 8 partners (EU15); bilateral Study Visits PIMMS TRANSFER: 2008-11 deepen and widen 14 “Regions”: 7 Initiation, 7 7 Progression PIMMS CAPITAL: 2010-12 2/5 regionalise 12 regions WHAT IS INTERREG IVC? STRUCTURAL FUNDS [2007-13 budget is €347bn = ⅓ EU budget] Objectives are regional development : A = cross-border (52) • Convergence B = trans-national (13) • Regional Competitiveness C = interregional (3) • Territorial Cooperation INTERREG IVC €321m = 0.1% of Structural Funds budget • builds networks to develop good practice and facilitate the exchange and transfer of experience by successful regions. • showcases what regions do well, to the benefit of those still investing Priority areas : • innovation and the knowledge economy, • environment and risk prevention Regional Initiative Projects | Capitalisation Projects WHAT IS CAPITALISATION • Transfer of “previously identified good practices” into mainstream Structural Funds programmes • Must be measurable: • Investment • Competitiveness Convergence • Target is the Regional Operational Programme: policy impact – getting something done • Project output: a Regional Action Plan for each region PIMMS CAPITAL is a Fast Track Network European Commission provides label and supports implementation 21 networks: 11 INTERREG IVC 10 URBACT II (Assessment questions - available on the RfEC website) = Accelerate the transfer of good ideas The PIMMS Transfer Methodology • Seeing-is-believing • Key decision-makers… not just from projectpartners but from all relevant organisations (“Deep Delegations”) • Critical Success Factors: what’s the magic ingredient that will allow the transfer • Project has a tight-loose structure: many bilateral actions, so partners set their own agenda • Own-language working: so that key decisionmakers can properly participate The PIMMS CAPITAL Questions • How can mobility management be adopted more effectively in regional transport and sustainability policy? • How to spread the understanding of mobility management? • How to overcome the problem of administrative competencies? • How to demonstrate the impact of mobility management? The PIMMS CAPITAL Project Structure Oct-10 to Dec-10 Plan visits, delegations stakeholders! Jan-11 to Jun-11 Export Visits SEE/SELECT Jul-11 to Dec-11 Import Workshops ADAPT Jan-12 to Jun-12 Regional Action Plans PLAN ADOPT Mar-12 to May-12 Regional Conferences DISCUSS Sep-12 Final Conference The PIMMS CAPITAL regions Hessen DE Basilicata IT Veneto IT Southern & Eastern IE Moravia-Silesia CZ Central Transdanubia HU West Transdanubia HU West Midlands UK Western Greece EL Stockholm SE () IE Competitiveness region Cyprus CY CZ Convergence region Sofia BG in PIMMS TRANSFER Hessen Export region Cyprus Not export region The PIMMS CAPITAL Good Practices#1 • it’s GOOD practices not best practices; ie what’s available to share between the partners • Long-list of 81, iteratively reduced to 14 during bid preparation • Being imported a total of 32 times via the project • Each import will be personalised (regionalised) to match the importer’s realities The PIMMS CAPITAL Good Practices#2 Frankfurt DE Aktionsprogram “effizient mobil” 1 Frankfurt DE Promotion of public transport 3 Frankfurt DE Traffic and Mobility Planning 3 Frankfurt DE Mobility Management and Mobility Centres 3 Moravia-Silesia CZ Integrated Public Transport System 2 Limerick IE Computer Aided Central Traffic Monitoring System 2 Limerick IE Bus Priority Corridors, Cycle lanes, Park & Ride 4 Stockholm SE Policy – Regional Platform on mobility management 2 Stockholm SE Regional transport, MM, spatial planning 3 Treviso IT Safe roads 2 Treviso, Venice IT Integrated fares: technological investments 2 Worcestershire UK Worcester Sustainable Travel Demonstration Town 3 CENTRO UK Integrated Transport Strategy 5 West Pannon HU Regional Operational Programme 1 EXPORT VISITS: OUTCOMES • Hosted events1 14 • Visitor delegations2 30 2.1 per event • Visitors 158 5.3 per delegation • Key decision-makers 87 55% of visitors • ‘Non-partner’ delegates 70 44% of visitors • Good practice aspects3 193 6.4 per delegation • Critical Success Factors 146 4.9 per delegation 1 2 3 4 more in Sep/Oct! 6 more delegations “Please identify what aspects of the good practice you consider could be transferred into your Regional Action Plan” KEY DECISION-MAKERS: CHEERS! CONTACTS • Lead Partner: Dr Johannes Theissen traffiQ – Frankfurt Public Transport Authority [email protected] +49 69 212 25108 • Secretariat: Tim Cordy [email protected] +44 1273 241688