Transcript Slide 1
AN INTRODUCTION
Tim Cordy, Project Secretariat:
traffiQ, Frankfurt
WHY PIMMS?
WHY PIMMS?
Partner Initiatives for the development of
Mobility Management Services
PIMMS: 2004-7
8 partners (EU15); bilateral Study Visits
PIMMS TRANSFER: 2008-11
deepen and widen 14 “Regions”: 7 Initiation, 7
7 Progression
PIMMS CAPITAL: 2010-12
2/5
regionalise 12 regions
WHAT IS INTERREG IVC?
STRUCTURAL FUNDS [2007-13 budget is €347bn = ⅓ EU budget]
Objectives are regional development :
A = cross-border (52)
• Convergence
B = trans-national (13)
• Regional Competitiveness
C = interregional (3)
• Territorial Cooperation
INTERREG IVC €321m = 0.1% of Structural Funds budget
• builds networks to develop good practice and facilitate the exchange
and transfer of experience by successful regions.
• showcases what regions do well, to the benefit of those still investing
Priority areas :
• innovation and the knowledge economy,
• environment and risk prevention
Regional Initiative Projects | Capitalisation Projects
WHAT IS CAPITALISATION
• Transfer of “previously identified good practices”
into mainstream Structural Funds programmes
• Must be measurable:
• Investment
• Competitiveness Convergence
• Target is the Regional Operational Programme:
policy impact – getting something done
• Project output: a Regional Action Plan for each
region
PIMMS CAPITAL is a Fast Track
Network
European
Commission
provides label
and supports
implementation
21 networks:
11 INTERREG IVC
10 URBACT II
(Assessment
questions - available
on the RfEC website)
= Accelerate the transfer of good ideas
The PIMMS Transfer Methodology
• Seeing-is-believing
• Key decision-makers… not just from projectpartners but from all relevant organisations
(“Deep Delegations”)
• Critical Success Factors: what’s the magic
ingredient that will allow the transfer
• Project has a tight-loose structure: many bilateral
actions, so partners set their own agenda
• Own-language working: so that key decisionmakers can properly participate
The PIMMS CAPITAL Questions
• How can mobility management be adopted more
effectively in regional transport and sustainability
policy?
• How to spread the understanding of mobility
management?
• How to overcome the problem of administrative
competencies?
• How to demonstrate the impact of mobility
management?
The PIMMS CAPITAL Project Structure
Oct-10 to Dec-10 Plan visits, delegations
stakeholders!
Jan-11 to Jun-11
Export Visits
SEE/SELECT
Jul-11 to Dec-11
Import Workshops
ADAPT
Jan-12 to Jun-12 Regional Action Plans
PLAN
ADOPT
Mar-12 to May-12 Regional Conferences
DISCUSS
Sep-12
Final Conference
The PIMMS CAPITAL regions
Hessen
DE
Basilicata
IT
Veneto
IT
Southern & Eastern
IE
Moravia-Silesia
CZ
Central Transdanubia HU
West Transdanubia
HU
West Midlands
UK
Western Greece
EL
Stockholm
SE
()
IE
Competitiveness region
Cyprus
CY
CZ
Convergence region
Sofia
BG
in PIMMS TRANSFER
Hessen Export region
Cyprus
Not export region
The PIMMS CAPITAL Good Practices#1
• it’s GOOD practices not best practices; ie what’s
available to share between the partners
• Long-list of 81, iteratively reduced to 14 during
bid preparation
• Being imported a total of 32 times via the project
• Each import will be personalised (regionalised) to
match the importer’s realities
The PIMMS CAPITAL Good Practices#2
Frankfurt DE
Aktionsprogram “effizient mobil”
1
Frankfurt DE
Promotion of public transport
3
Frankfurt DE
Traffic and Mobility Planning
3
Frankfurt DE
Mobility Management and Mobility Centres
3
Moravia-Silesia CZ
Integrated Public Transport System
2
Limerick IE
Computer Aided Central Traffic Monitoring System
2
Limerick IE
Bus Priority Corridors, Cycle lanes, Park & Ride
4
Stockholm SE
Policy – Regional Platform on mobility management
2
Stockholm SE
Regional transport, MM, spatial planning
3
Treviso IT
Safe roads
2
Treviso, Venice IT
Integrated fares: technological investments
2
Worcestershire UK
Worcester Sustainable Travel Demonstration Town
3
CENTRO UK
Integrated Transport Strategy
5
West Pannon HU
Regional Operational Programme
1
EXPORT VISITS: OUTCOMES
• Hosted events1
14
• Visitor delegations2
30 2.1 per event
• Visitors
158 5.3 per delegation
• Key decision-makers
87 55% of visitors
• ‘Non-partner’ delegates
70 44% of visitors
• Good practice aspects3
193 6.4 per delegation
• Critical Success Factors
146 4.9 per delegation
1
2
3
4 more in Sep/Oct!
6 more delegations
“Please identify what aspects of the good practice you consider
could be transferred into your Regional Action Plan”
KEY DECISION-MAKERS: CHEERS!
CONTACTS
• Lead Partner:
Dr Johannes Theissen
traffiQ – Frankfurt Public Transport Authority
[email protected]
+49 69 212 25108
• Secretariat:
Tim Cordy
[email protected]
+44 1273 241688