Transcript Document
DCF Kidstat: How PerformanceStat can
Work for You
Fredi-Ellen Bove
Division of Safety and Permanence Administrator
Department of Children and Families
1
The Importance of Data
“In God we trust;
all others must bring data”
•
--W. Edwards Deming
•
dcf.wisconsin.gov
Presentation Topics
I.
What is KidStat/PerformanceStat?
II.
Overview of DCF KidStat
III. Does KidStat Work? A Case Study
IV. Lessons Learned and Benefits
dcf.wisconsin.gov
3
What is KidStat/PerformanceStat?
• The DCF KidStat is a type of PerformanceStat system
• PerformanceStat is a leadership strategy designed to achieve specific public
purposes. PerformanceStat:
Involves regular, frequent, integrated meetings that include chief
executive, the leadership team, and directors of subunits
Uses current data to analyze specific, previously defined performance
measures;
Provides feedback on recent progress compared with targets
Follows up on previous decisions and commitments
Promotes learning from efforts to improve performance
Identifies and seeks to solve performance-deficit problems
Sets and achieves the next performance targets
(From Robert Behn, The PerformanceStat Potential)
dcf.wisconsin.gov
History of PerformanceStat/KidStat
• First PerformanceStat system, called “CompStat”, started in New York
Police Department in 1994
• Another relatively early and signficant adopter was Baltimore, Maryland
which implemented “CitiStat” in 2000
• Wisconsin DCF initiated KidStat in 2009
• Many public agencies at the state and local levels now use a
PerformanceStat system
dcf.wisconsin.gov
Overview of DCF KidStat
•
A KidStat system is in place for each Division
•
The Division, in collaboration with the Secretary’s Office has identified the results
it is seeking to achieve and the performance measures for those results
•
Bimonthly meetings are held for each Division’s KidStat
Members of the Secretary’s Office, managers of key support functions (e.g.,
HR, IT, Budget), and Division Administrator, managers, and staff attend
For the Division of Safety and Permanence KidStat, which addresses child
welfare issues, counties or other external partners often attend
•
Meetings are intended to be collaborative problem-solving forums
•
Data on each performance measure is compiled by an office external to the Division
Division reviews the data prior to the meeting
Data is displayed via powerpoint at the meeting and discussed
Division of Safety and Permanence KidStat Results
and Core Performance Measures
•
Children are safe from abuse and neglect
How timely are initial contacts completed?
How timely are Initial Assessments (IAs) completed?
What percentage of monthly caseworker contacts are made in a timely manner?
How many children are victims of maltreatment while in out-of-home care?
What percentage of children who are substantiated victims of maltreatment are
not revictimized within 6 months?
dcf.wisconsin.gov
Division of Safety and Permanence KidStat Results
and Core Performance Measures
•
Children achieve permanency
At what rate are children reaching legal permanency?
Of the children who discharge to reunification, what percentage do so within
12 months?
How many children are discharging to Guardianship and Subsidized
Guardianship?
Of the children who discharge to adoption, what percentage do so within 24
months?
Of the children who have finalized adoptions, what is the average length of
time from removal to adoption?
dcf.wisconsin.gov
Division of Safety and Permanence KidStat Results
and Core Performance Measures
•
Children experience stability in their out-of-home placement
What percentage of children experience placement stability in care for 0-12
months?
In BMCW, how many children experience 3 or fewer placements while in outof-home care (as defined by the lawsuit agreement)?
•
Children spend minimal time in out-of-home care
What percent of children re-enter out-of-home care within 12 months from the
date of discharge?
dcf.wisconsin.gov
Division of Safety and Permanence KidStat
Measures
•
Other measures added on a quarterly basis
How timely is the Critical Incident 90 day summary report process?
How many children are aging out of care?
•
On annual basis, review WI performance versus other states
•
Additional analysis that represents a “deeper data dive” is often included
dcf.wisconsin.gov
Benchmarks
•
Benchmarks used
State requirements (e.g., 60 days for completion of Initial Assessment)
Federal requirements (e.g., 90% compliance for monthly caseworker contacts)
Federal targets (e.g., 76.1% of children who discharge to reunification do so
within 12 months)
•
Other possible benchmarks
Peer Group Performance
Best Practice
dcf.wisconsin.gov
Additional Features of DSP KidStat
•
In addition to core measures, a special focus area is presented at each KidStat
A pilot program or program that is not yet statewide (e.g., Trauma Project); due
to small scale the program effects are not reflected in the broad-based KidStat
measures
Programs that are outside the scope of the current KidStat measures (e.g.,
educational outcomes of children in out-of-home care)
•
External partners, such as counties and other state agencies, are invited to
participate in the KidStat meetings
•
DSP managers and relevant staff meet in the month in between KidStat to discuss
follow-up from previous KidStat and prepare for upcoming KidStat
Does KidStat Work?
Re-entry Case Study
Safety and Permanence
Statewide
Target Direction:
Children spend minimal time in out of home care.
How many children re-enter OHC within 12 months from the date of discharge?
Analysis
Reentry within 12 Months of Reunification
25%
In the month of October:
•
The federal 25th percentile target of
9.9% is represented by the red line.
•
Statewide performance of
20.6% (blue line) did not
achieve the target in October.
20%
15%
10%
•
Only one of the 18 driver counties met
the 25th percentile standard on this
measure:
•
Rock 8.6%
•
All five of the largest counties failed to
achieve the 25th percentile target:
•
Racine 14.4%
•
Brown 16.7%
•
Milwaukee 19.3%
•
Dane 22.5%
•
Kenosha 25.2%
5%
0%
Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11
Milw aukee 15.4% 15.6% 15.6% 16.7% 17.9% 18.4% 18.8% 19.0% 19.2% 19.0% 18.2% 18.5% 19.3%
BOS
19.2% 19.4% 19.0% 18.7% 19.2% 20.5% 20.7% 20.8% 21.5% 21.4% 21.3% 21.5% 20.9%
Statew ide
18.2% 18.4% 18.1% 18.2% 18.9% 20.0% 20.2% 20.4% 21.0% 20.9% 20.6% 20.9% 20.6%
Statewide, Wisconsin did NOT achieve this
measure for October 20.6% > 9.9%.
14
Does KidStat Work?
Re-entry Case Study
•
KidStat Re-entry measure in 2011
WI performance consistently at 20%, versus federal benchmark of 9.9%
Re-entry exposes children to repeated trauma, which hinders the healthy
development of the brain and has lifelong negative physical health and
social-emotional consequences
•
DSP engaged in deeper data dive
Analyzed whether high re-entry was driven by juvenile justice population
Analyzed data entry errors
Analysis showed that after accounting for these factors, high re-entry rate
remained for child welfare population
•
Concluded that a stronger program intervention was needed
2012: DCF applied for and received federal approval to implement a 12month Post-Reunification Support program through a Title IV-E waiver
DSP KidStat: Lessons Learned
•
Secure commitment by organization’s leadership to PerformanceStat
•
Develop measures that are meaningful and aligned with organization’s strategic
plan
•
Develop a culture that uses PerformanceStat meetings as problem-solving
meetings where entire agency owns the performance and seeks improvement
“PerformanceStat is not about them, PerformanceStat is about us” (Robert
Behn)
•
Seek to integrate PerformanceStat into ongoing program and practice
Involve staff in PerformanceStat meetings and follow-up
DSP KidStat: Lessons Learned
• Use the PerformanceStat measures to drive deeper data analysis
Focus additional analysis on priority issues
Avoid giving undue attention to a single monthly change, as it may not
represent a trend
•
Determine meeting frequency that balances workload of preparation with benefit
of maintaining focus and momentum
•
Participation in PerformanceStat meetings by external partners brings added
insights
•
Understand limitations of PerformanceStat
Does not pick up changes caused by pilot programs, due to small scale
Does not capture all aspects of outcomes, (e.g., quality of work)
Benefits of KidStat
•
Effectively identifies areas of performance deficits and strengths
•
Strengthens focus at all levels of the organization on priority areas needing
improvement
•
Can be a tool to facilitate productive problem-solving and collaboration across
units to improve the priority performance areas
•
Fosters overall culture change in the organization to be more data-driven in all
aspects of work
Implementing PerformanceStat at the County Level
•
Implementing PerformanceStat at the county level has the same potential benefits
as at the state level
•
Performance on many child welfare measures are reported by county on the DCF
dashboards on the web
•
DCF dashboards also provide data that can be used as benchmarks:
Federal benchmarks
Wisconsin statewide performance
Performance by a peer group of WI counties (e.g., similar sized counties)
•
Let a PerformanceStat system work for you!
Questions
Comments
Discussion
dcf.wisconsin.gov