Transcript 幻灯片 1

Two- and Three-particle Correlations
in a Partonic Transport Model
Y.G. Ma, G.L. Ma, S. Zhang, X. Z. Cai, H. Z. Huang et al.
Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS





Background introduction
Model introduction
Analysis method
Results and discussions
Conclusions
G.L. Ma, S. Zhang, YGM et al., Phys Lett B 641, 362 (2006)
G.L.Ma, YGM, S. Zhang et al., arXiv:nucl-th/0608050, sub to PLB
G.L.Ma, S. Zhang, YGM et al., arXiv:nucl-th/0610088, sub to APS
(1
Di-hadron correlations
pT(assoc) > 2 GeV/c
Associated
particles
On away side:
Hard associated
particles →
suppression
pT(assoc) > 0.15 GeV/c
Soft associated
particles →
enhancement
(2
t Associated particles on Away side (thermalization)
near side
away side
SOFTENED
BROADENED
thermalization???
What happens to a hard probe that traverses a colored
medium? softened + broadened =?= thermalized
(3
Mach-like Structures
PHENIX PRL 97, 052301 (2006)
NPA 774, 581 (2006)
(4
Possible interpretations of Mach-like structures
Wake Effect or “sonic boom”
Θemission= arccos (cs/c)
NPA 750, 121 (2005) Stöecker
hep-ph/0411315, hep-ph/0602183
Casalderrey-Solana
PLB 618, 123 (2005) J. Ruppert
PRC 73, 011901(R) (2006) T. Renk
PRL 97, 062301(2006) A. K. Chaudhuri
Cherenkov gluon radiation
Θemission= arccos (1/n(p))
PRL 96, 172302 (2006)
Koch, Majumder, X.-N. Wang
PLB 630, 78 (2005) I. Vitev
NPA 767, 233 (2006) I.M. Dremin
Correlation of Jet with flowing medium
PRC 72, 064910 (2005) Armesto
(5
AMPT model
a multi-phase transport model (by C. M. Ko and Z. W. Lin et al.)
(1) Default AMPT Model
(2) Melting AMPT Model
(6
Mixing-event Technique


correlation signal in
same event.
(2)Get respective
background by
mixing events in
same centrality.
(3)Get  correlation
by removing
background with
ZYAM method.
1/NtrigdNch/d
 (1) Get raw 
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
4608
trig
PT 3-6GeV/c ,PT
same event
asso
0.15-3GeV/c
mix event
20-40%
6
20-40%
4
2
0
-1
Background
Subtracted signal
0
1
2

3
4
5
(7
 correlations from AMPT
(3<pTtrigger<6GeV/c ,0.15<pTassoc<3GeV/c)
Au+Au 200GeV (0-10%)
AMPT 0-10%,(3-6) x (0.15-3)GeV/c
melting version after hadronic rescattering
melting version before hadronic rescattering
default version after hadronic rescattering
default version before hadronic rescattering
Star Data 0-5% (4-6) x (0.15-4)GeV/c factor=1.58
1/NtrigdN/d
(1) ▲melting
version
8
after hadronic
7
rescattering
(2) ● melting version
6
before hadronic
rescattering
5
(3)◆ default version
4
after hadronic
rescattering
3
(4)★ default version
before hadronic
2
rescattering
1
(5) ■ Star
Data
0-5% (4-6)*(0.154)GeV/c0 factor=1.58
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
(rad)
(8
Mach-like
Structures in
AMPT model
0.5
1/NtrigdN/d
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
associated
AMPT PT 2.5-4(GeV/c),PT
1-3.(GeV/c)
melting version after hadronic rescattering
default version after hadronic rescattering
trig
associated
exp. data PT 2.5-4(GeV/c),PT
2-3(GeV/c)
2
4
6
8
10
impact parameter b (fm)
D
0.2
0.1
12
-0.1
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.5
1/NtrigdN/d
1/NtrigdN/d
1.1
1/NtrigdN/d
spliting parameter D (rad)
1.2
0.5
0.3
0.0
 correlations in Au+Au 200GeV
(2.5<pTtrigger<4GeV/c ,1<pTassoc<2.5GeV/c)
trig
0.4
0-10% (2.5-4)X(1-2.5)GeV/c
melting version after hadron rescattering factor=1/4.2
melting version before hadron rescattering factor=1/4.2
default version after hadron rescattering factor=1/1.75
default version before hadron rescattering factor=1/1.75
PHENIX data 0-5% factor=1.58
0.4
0.3
10-20% (2.5-4)X(1-2.5)GeV/c
melting version after hadron rescattering factor=1/1.75
melting version before hadron rescattering factor=1/1.75
default version after hadron rescattering factor=1/0.7
PHENIX data 10-20% faxtor=1.58
20-40% (2.5-4)X(1-2.5)GeV/c
melting version after hadron rescattering factor=1/1.75
melting version before hadron rescattering factor=1/1.75
default version after hadron rescattering factor=1/0.7
PHENIX data 20-40% factor=1.58
40-90% (2.5-4)X(1-2.5)GeV/c
melting version after hadron rescattering factor=1/1.4
melting version before hadron rescattering factor=1/1.4
default version after hadron rescattering factor=1/0.7
PHENIX data 60-90% factor=1.58
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0
1
2
(rad)
(9 3
Is there conical flow?
near
near
3-4 GeV/c
2
trigger
Medium
1-2 GeV/c
assoc
assoc
Medium
away
3-particle correlation
mach cone
away
di-jetsnear
soft
bkgd
1
2
hard-soft-corr + soft-bkgd.
flow modulated background:
1  2v2trig v2(1) cos[2(1  trig )]
2v2trig v2(2) cos[2(2  trig )]
2v2(1) v2(2) cos[2(1  2 )]
Medium
away
deflected jets
1
soft-soft-corr in underlying event.
Three-particle correlations in AMPT
mix-event technique
background subtracted
3-particle correlation signal
(10
The Npart dependences of
three-particle correlations
3-particle correlation
density definition:


region
d 2N
d1d2
d1d2
 d d
1
2
region
(11
What happens for p+p?
No Mach-cone behavior!
Correlations between forward- and mid-rapidity in d+Au
collisions
STAR Preliminary
Mid-rapidity
trig.
asso.
Forward-rapidity
Parton cascade effect on 2- and 3- particle
correlations
(1)Hadronic rescattering
mechanism also can
produce 2- and 3-particle
correlations, but it can
not give big enough
splitting parameters.
(2) Parton cascade
mechanism is essential
for describing the
amplitude of
experimental mach-like
structure.
(12
Time Evolution of Mach-like Structures in AMPT
model
0.7
melting AMPT model
without hadronic
rescattering (10mb)
central 0-10%, |y|<1.0
(2.5-4.0)X(1.-2.5)GeV/c
0.5
1.6
1.5
assoc
0.4
0.3
1/NtrigdN
hadron
1/NtrigdN
assoc
/d
lifetime (fm/c)=
0.5
1.0
melting AMPT model
without hadronic
rescattering (10mb)
central 0-10%, |y|<1.0
(2.5-4.0)X(1.-2.5)GeV/c
(b)
0.2
lifetime (fm/c)=
2.0
2.5
4.0
5.0
/d
0.6
2.0
hadron
(a)
1.2
3.0
0.8
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
-1
0
1
2
3
4
(Rad)
Lifetime
parton cascade
hadronic rescattering
5
6
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
(Rad)
At least a lifetime of partonic matter of
1.5 fm/c is needed for the birth of Machlike structures for 10mb.
(13
Partonic Mach-Like
Shock Waves ?
Au+Au 200GeV (0-10%)
(14
pT dependences
of Mach-like
structures
pT-dependent Mach-like
shock waves
(15
η dependences of
Mach-like structures
PHOBOS
? √
?
? ? ?
(16
Conclusions and Outlook
Conclusions:
1) Partonic Mach-like shock waves are born in the
strong parton cascade and further developed in
hadronic rescattering process.
2) Hadronic rescattering mechanism can produce
similar correlation, but it can not give big enough
splitting parameters and correlation areas.
3) The partonic shock waves are centralitydependent ,pT-dependent and η-dependent.
Outlook:
1) Special trigger particles and associated particles
2) System-size dependence including d+Au and p+p
3) Δη and ridge- correlations
(17