Spinal - Epidural - [Combined Spinal Epidural]

Download Report

Transcript Spinal - Epidural - [Combined Spinal Epidural]

Spinal Anesthesia

Donald H. Lambert Boston, Massachusetts

http://www.debunk-it.org

www.debunk-it.org

RULE N0. 1: YOUR ATTENDING IS ALWAYS RIGHT.

RULE NO. 2: IF YOUR ATTENDING IS WRONG, SEE RULE NO. 1.

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Advantages of Spinal Anesthesia

 Technically easy  Objective end-point  Rapid onset  Profound sensory and motor block  Low potential for systemic toxicity

Disadvantages of Spinal Anesthesia

 Limited duration  Limited sensory and motor separation  “Hypotension”  Potential neuro-toxicity  Headache

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Indications

Any operation in the lower abdomen and below

Absolute Contraindications

 Patient refusal  Uncorrected hypovolemia  Uncorrected coagulopathy  Infection at site of injection  Increased intracranial pressure

Relative Contraindications

 Some neurologic diseases  Bacteremia  Deformities that preclude doing an LP easily

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Positioning for the Lumbar Puncture

 Two choices  Sitting  Lateral decubitus (recumbent)

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Getting the needle in the right spot

What is the object of the game of basketball?

Get the ball in the hoop (Red Aurbach).

What are we trying to do with spinal anesthesia?

Get the needle into the CSF.

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Baricity

 The density of the local anesthetic solution in relation to the density of the CSF  More dense than CSF  hyperbaric  sinks  Same density as CSF  isobaric  stay where it is injected (relatively)  Less dense than CSF  hypobaric  floats

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Spinal Anesthesia

 Dosing will affect  Spread  Duration  Quality of Anesthesia  That is, the need for supplemental IV medication

 The dosing in this study was 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg of bupivacaine  The lowest dose limited spread  The lowest dose also resulted in more failures than the higher doses.

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

.

Agent Proc.

Chlorop.

Lido.

Mep.

Prilo.

Ropiv.

Dibu.

Bupiv.

Tetra.

Spinal Anesthesia Agents

Conc. (%) 10 2 1.5 – 5 4 ?

?

0.06-0.5

0.25-.75

0.25-1 Dose 100-200 40-120 30-100 40-80 ?

?

2.5-12 5-22.5

5-20 Gluc. Duration 7.5

9 ?

?

5 8.25

5 30-90 30-90 30-90 30-90 ?

?

75-150 75-150 75-150

Hyperbaric Isobaric

Dosing Guidelines

 Based on the spinal canal model (and many years of doing this)  Hyperbaric solutions extend into the thoracic region  Isobaric solution remain in the lumbar region  I give hyperbaric solutions for operations above the L1 dermatome and isobaric solutions for those below

Dosing Guidelines

 Hernia operations and those operations whose innervation is by nerves above L1 

HYPERBARIC

 Those operations whose innervation is by nerves below L1 (pretty much all lower extremity operation including hip operations) 

ISOBARIC

CHOOSING A LOCAL ANESTHETIC FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA BASE DECISION ON THE DURATION OF THE OPERATION DURATION AGENT < > 1.5 HRS 1.5 HRS PROCAINE (LIDOCAINE, ?CHLOROPROCAINE, ?ROPIVACAINE) BUPIVACAINE (TETRACAINE)

CHOOSING A LOCAL ANESTHETIC FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA GIVE ENOUGH TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE ANESTHESIA BARICITY ISOBARIC HYPERBARIC PROC.

80 mg 80 mg LIDO.

60 mg 60 mg BUPIV.

15 mg 15 mg TETRA.

15 mg 15 mg ? CHLOROPRACAINE, ? ROPIVACAINE

Isobaric Spinal Anesthesia

 Epidural Bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia is an “ off label use ” of this agent  It says right on the bottle: “Not for spinal anesthesia”   What is the value or wisdom behind using that agent?

It works great and I have used it since the 1980’s.

 I know of no reports of complications associated with using it.

 Litigation for the off-labeled use of a drug has not appeared in the ASA closed claims database.

 Who would know?

 Unless you wrote on your anesthesia record, “I used the bupivacaine that is not for spinal anesthesia.”

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Narcotic work here in the substantia gelatinosa Local anesthetics work here in the nerve roots

Spinal Anesthesia

 Addition of narcotics  Fentanyl (15-25 ug lasts a few hours)  Sufentanil (10 - 20 ug lasts a few hours)  Morphine (100 - 200 ug lasts 12-24 hours)  Side effects (increase with increasing dose)  Nausea and vomiting  Itching  Respiratory depression

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Spinal Anesthesia

 Complications  Cardiac arrest  Hypotension  Headache  Nerve injury

Cardiac Arrest Still Occurring 

Editorial on Auroy’s study:

“Spinal anesthesia appears in this study to be more dangerous than other regional anesthesia techniques.”

 “The risk of cardiac arrest is five- to six fold greater than with other regional anesthetic techniques ” Eisenach, James C. Regional Anesthesia: Vintage Bordeaux (and Napa Valley) Anesthesiology 1997;87:467-469

Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors Number of Claims Number of Arrests Mean Age ASA Physical Status 1988 900 14 (1.5%) 36 I - II 2004 5,047 68 (1.3%) 42 I - II

Caplan, R A; et al. Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology 1988;68:5-11 Caplan, R A; et al. Injuries Associated with Regional Anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: A Closed Claims Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:143-152

Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors Local Anesthetic Tetracaine Dose Maximum Level Time of Arrest 6 - 14 mg T4

12 -

78 minutes

Caplan, R A; et al. Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology 1988;68:5-11

Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors

 Factors Predisposing to Asystole  High level  Loss of Cardiac Sympathetic Stimulation  Unopposed Vagal Tone  Decreased Venous Return  Empty Left Ventricle  Activation of Intracardiac Reflexes  ? So-called Bezold-Jarisch Reflex  ? So-called Vaso-vagal Syncope

Caplan, R A; et al. Anesthesiology 1988;68:5-11 and Mackey, D C, et al. Anesthesiology 1989;70:866-868

Cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia

 How can this be prevented and/or treated?

 Maintain venous return at all cost  Use epinephrine at the first sign of cardiac arrest

Keats, A. S. Anesthesia mortality--a new mechanism.

Anesthesiology 1988;68:2-4.

Cardiac Arrest Associated with Anesthesia (per 10,000)

Author Aromaa Auroy Biboulet Auroy Sprung Kopp Year 1997 1997 2001 2002 2003 2005 Spinal 0.04

6.4

6.5

2.7

1.5* 2.9

Epidural 0 0.98

0 0 N/A 0.9

General N/A N/A 0.8

N/A 5.5

29 cases * ”Regional Anesthesia”

Cardiac Arrest Associated with Anesthesia

 There appears to be two mechanisms for cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia  Spinal factors  Vaso-depressor syncope  Factors other than the spinal  Blood loss  Cardiac events  Orthopedic manipulations

Spinal Anesthesia

 Complications  Cardiac arrest  Hypotension  Headache  Nerve injury

Spinal Anesthesia Complications

Hypotension (happens!)

Spinal Anesthesia

 Complications  Cardiac arrest  Hypotension  Headache  Nerve injury

The Two Components of Spinal Headache

 There must have been a lumbar puncture  The headache is related to posture  Worst when standing or sitting  Gone or improved with recumbence

Effect of Age on the Incidence of Spinal Headache

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 Age 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 Vandam and Dripps JAMA 1956;161:586-591

Effect of Needle Gauge on the Incidence of Spinal Headache

18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 16 19 20 Needle Gauge 22 24 Vandam and Dripps JAMA 1956;161:586-591

Spinal Anesthesia

 Complications  Cardiac arrest  Hypotension  Headache  Nerve injury

Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 Two types  Permanent  Cauda equina syndrome  Adhesive arachnoiditis  Non-permanent  Transient radicular irritation

Permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 Lidocaine spinal anesthesia was associated with 14.4 per 10,000 neurologic complications compared to 2.2 per 10,000 for bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

Auroy Y. et al. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 1274-80

Permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 In the cases [of cauda equina syndrome and paraparesis] after subarachnoid block, hyperbaric 5% lidocaine was used in eight cases , bupivacaine 0.5% in 11 cases , and in one case a mixture of both drugs was used. Moen V. et al: Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 950-9

Major Complication of Spinal Anesthesia

 Spinal is somewhat more dangerous in causing cardiac arrest and major nerve injury than epidural or general  Epidural has a neurological injury rate similar to spinal but the injuries are different  Epidural are associated with hematoma and compressive nerve injury (? owing to volume)  Spinals are associated with local anesthetic toxicity

Permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 Neurologic injury associated with paresthesia or pain on injection is believed to be traumatic .

 Neurologic injury not associate with paresthesia or pain on injection is believed to be due to local anesthetic toxicity .

Nerve Injury Still Occurring 

Editorial on Auroy’s study:

“Spinal anesthesia appears in this study to be more dangerous than other regional anesthesia techniques.”

 “Neurologic injury is two- to threefold greater with spinal than with other regional anesthetic techniques.” Eisenach, James C. Regional Anesthesia: Vintage Bordeaux (and Napa Valley) Anesthesiology 1997;87:467-469

Non-permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 Minor complications  Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) a.k.a. transient radicular irritation (TRI)

Non-permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 TNS/TRI  Most frequent with lidocaine (10-34% incidence)  More frequent with lithotomy position and knee arthroscopy  VAS pain score averages 6 out of 10  Many rate the pain worse than their incision  Can last up to three days  Least frequent with bupivacaine

Non-permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 TNS/TRI  The best alternative to lidocaine appears to be bupivacaine.  Lasts too long  Other shorter acting substitutes have not caught on.

 Procaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, ropivacaine

Non-permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 TNS/TRI  Chloroprocaine ( off label ) is being rediscovered as a short acting spinal anesthetic.

 Series of ten articles by Dan Kopacz et al. in the last year (see Anesth Analg 2004 and 2005)  Comparable to lidocaine.

 No TNS

Non-permanent Nerve Injury with Spinal Anesthesia

 TNS/TRI  The spinal anesthetic profile of 40 mg chloroprocaine compares favorably with the same dose of spinal lidocaine  Lidocaine was associated with mild to moderate TNS in 7 of 8 subjects  No subject complained of TNS with chloroprocaine Yoos JR, Kopacz DJ:. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 566-72

Spinal Anesthesia

Advantages v. Disadvantages  Indications and Contraindications  Positioning  Getting ready  Getting the needle in the right spot  Baricity  Dosing  What to inject  Addition of a vasoconstrictor  Addition of narcotics  Complications (and how to avoid them)

Unanswered questions are better than unquestioned answers!

Questions?

www.debunk-it.org - Anesthesiology Forum