Answering Questions

Download Report

Transcript Answering Questions

Learning Styles
An Introduction to the Ways
People Learn
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
1
Learning Styles: Topics
Background
Learning Style Models
Teaching to All Types
References
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
2
Background
Students have different “learning styles”
Learning styles describe how students
prefer to and are best able to receive
and process information
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
3
Background
Learning styles indicate preferences for:
Facts and data
 Theories and models
 Visual presentation – pictures and
diagrams
 Verbal presentation – written and spoken
 Active and interactive learning
 Introspective and individual learning

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
4
Background
Teaching solely in a manner not well
suited to a student’s learning style may
cause enough discomfort to interfere
with learning
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
5
Background
However…
Teaching only to the preferred modes
may result in students lacking the
mental agility to reach their potential
academically and professionally
In other words…they might not adapt
well
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
6
Learning Style Models
Three common learning styles models
include:
Kolb’s Learning Style Model
Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
7
Kolb’s Learning Style
Type 1 – Concrete, Reflective
Type 2 – Abstract, Reflective
Type 3 – Abstract, Active
Type 4 – Concrete, Active
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
8
Kolb’s Learning Style
Type 1 – Concrete, Reflective
Typically asks “Why?”
 Responds well to explanations of how
course material relates to their experience,
their interests, and their future careers
 To be successful with Type 1, the instructor
should motivate

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
9
Kolb’s Learning Style
Type 2 – Abstract, Reflective
Typically asks “What?”
 Responds well to information that is
presented in an organized, logical fashion
and benefits from reflection
 Instructor should function as an expert

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
10
Kolb’s Learning Style
Type 3 – Abstract, Active
Typically asks “How?”
 Responds well to working actively on welldefined tasks and by trial-and-error in an
environment that allows them to fail safely
 Instructor should function as a coach by
providing guided practice and feedback.

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
11
Kolb’s Learning Style
Type 4 – Concrete, Active
Typically asks “What if?”
 Prefers to apply course material in new
situations to solve real problems.
 Instructor should stay out of the way to let
students discover things on their own.

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
12
Felder-Silverman
Sensing/Intuitive
Visual/Verbal
Inductive/Deductive
Active/Reflective
Sequential/Global
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
13
Felder-Silverman
Sensing
Concrete, Practical
 Oriented toward facts and procedures

Intuitive
Conceptual, Innovative
 Oriented toward theories and meanings

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
14
Felder-Silverman
Visual
Prefer visual representations of material
 Pictures, Diagrams, Flow charts

Verbal

Prefer written and spoken explanations
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
15
Felder-Silverman
Inductive

Prefer presentations that proceed from the
specific to the general
Deductive

Prefer presentations that go from general
to the specific
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
16
Felder-Silverman
Active
Learn by trying things out
 Prefer working with others

Reflective
Learn by thinking things through
 Prefer working alone

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
17
Felder-Silverman
Sequential
Linear, Orderly
 Learn in small incremental steps

Global
Holistic, Systems thinkers
 Learn in large leaps

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
18
Myers-Briggs
Extraverts/Introverts
Sensors/Intuitors
Thinkers/Feelers
Judgers/Perceivers
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
19
Myers-Briggs
Extraverts
Like to try things out
 Focus on the outer world of people

Introverts
Think things through
 Focus on the inner world of ideas

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
20
Myers-Briggs
Sensors
Practical
 Detail-oriented
 Focus on facts and procedures

Intuitors
Imaginative
 Concept-oriented
 Focus on meanings and possibilities

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
21
Myers-Briggs
Thinkers
Skeptical
 Tend to make decisions based on logic and
rules

Feelers
Appreciative
 Tend to make decisions based on personal
and humanistic considerations

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
22
Myers-Briggs
Judgers
Set and follow agendas
 Seek closure even with incomplete data

Perceivers
Adapt to changing circumstances
 Resist closure to obtain more data

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
23
Teaching to All Types
Appealing to a wide array of learning
styles can be achieved, based on the
Felder-Silverman model, by:
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
24
Teaching to All Types

Using plots, graphics, and demonstrations
along with oral and written explanations
(visual/verbal)

Balancing concrete information such as
experimental results with conceptual
information like theories and models
(sensing/intuitive)
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
25
Teaching to All Types

Demonstrating the logical flow of material
but also making connections to other
classes, topics, and everyday experiences
(sequential/global)

Encouraging or requiring cooperative
learning (all learning styles)
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
26
Teaching to All Types

Asking students to explain a general
principle given only experimental
observations (inductive)

Providing in class time for students to
consider the material presented as well as
for active participation (reflective/active)
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
27
References
Matters of Style, Felder, Richard, ASEE
Prism, 6(4), 18-23, December 1996
http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition
28