Transcript Document
Practical Approaches to Managing Hypertension: Reducing Global Cardiovascular Risk Randall M. Zusman, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Director Division of Hypertension and Vascular Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts Key Question Which class of agents do you presently consider first-line treatment for patients with hypertension? 1. Diuretics 2. β-Blockers (BBs) 3. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) 4. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) 5. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) 6. All of the above Use your keypad to vote now! ? Faculty Disclosure Dr Zusman: advisory board member, research support, speakers bureau: AstraZeneca, BristolMyers Squibb Company, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Pfizer Inc, sanofi-aventis Group, Sankyo Co., Ltd. Learning Objectives State the prevalence of hypertension and its role in the cardiovascular disease continuum Formulate hypertension management according to risk stratification Describe the importance of targeting improvement in vascular function in patients with hypertension Hypertension and Global CV Risk What Is Global CV Risk? Treating hypertension to goal is good Addressing all CV risk factors is better Achieve optimal BP level Avoid CV and renal morbidity and mortality Chobanian AV et al, for the NHBPEPCC. Bethesda, Md: NHLBI; 2004. NIH Publication No. 04-5230. Available at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. JNC 7 Cardiovascular Risk Factors Hypertension Microalbuminuria Cigarette smoking or estimated GFR <60 mL/min Age (men >55 yr; women >65 yr) Family history of premature CVD Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) Physical inactivity Dyslipidemia Diabetes mellitus Chobanian AV et al, for the NHBPEPCC. Bethesda, Md: NHLBI; 2004. NIH Publication No. 04-5230. Available at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. Key Question What percentage of patients with hypertension have 2 or more additional CV risk factors? 1. 20% 2. 30% 3. 40% 4. 50% 5. >50% Use your keypad to vote now! ? CV Risk Factor Clustering With Hypertension: Framingham Offspring, Aged 18 to 74 Years >50% of Hypertension Occurs in Presence of 2 or More Risk Factors Men Women 1 RF 2 RFs 1 RF 25% 26% 12% 3 RFs 4 or More RFs 20% 17% 8% No Additional RFs 24% 27% 22% 19% 2 RFs No Additional RFs RF = risk factor. Adapted from Kannel WB. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:3S-10S. 3 RFs 4 or More RFs 10-Year Probability of Event (%) Risk of CHD in Mild Hypertension by Intensity of Associated Risk Factors Risk Factors 40 42 36 30 21 24 18 10 12 6 4 14 6 0 SBP 150-160 mm Hg TC 240-262 mg/dL HDL-C 33-35 mg/dL Diabetes Cigarette smoking ECG-LVH + − − − − − + + − − − − + + + − − − Adapted from Kannel WB. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:3S-10S. + + + + − − + + + + + − + + + + + + JNC 7: Algorithm for Hypertension LIFESTYLE MODIFICATIONS Not at Goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease) INITIAL DRUG CHOICES Without Compelling Indications Stage 1 Hypertension Thiazide-type diuretics for most; may consider ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB, or combo Stage 2 Hypertension 2-drug combos for most (usually thiazide-type diuretics and ACEI, or ARB, or BB, or CCB) With Compelling Indications Compelling Indications Other drugs (diuretic, ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB) as needed If not at goal BP, optimize dosages or add drugs until goal BP achieved; consider consultation with hypertension specialist Chobanian AV et al, for the NHBPEPCC. Bethesda, Md: NHLBI; 2004. NIH Publication No. 04-5230. Available at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. Nonpharmacologic Interventions and BP Reduction Weight Loss (19.4 lb) 0 Low-Salt Diet Exercise Alcohol Potassium Reduction Supplement BP Decrease (mm Hg) 1 2 3 4 5 6 SBP DBP 7 Adapted from: Stevens VJ et al. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:1-11; Messerli FH et al. In: Griffin BP et al, eds. 2004. Manual of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2nd ed; Whelton SP et al. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:493-503; Cutler JA et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(suppl):643S-651S; Xin X et al. Hypertension. 2001;38:1112-1117; Whelton PK et al. JAMA. 1997;277:1624-1632. JNC 7 Classification of Blood Pressure STAGE 2 SBP 160 mm Hg or DBP 100 mm Hg Treatment recommended STAGE 1 SBP 140-159 mm Hg or DBP 90-99 mm Hg PREHYPERTENSION SBP 120-139 mm Hg or DBP 80-89 mm Hg NORMAL Consider treatment in those with diabetes or renal disease who fail lifestyle modification SBP <120 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg Chobanian AV et al, for the NHBPEPCC. Bethesda, Md: NHLBI; 2004. NIH Publication No. 04-5230. Available at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. Goal BP Recommendations for Patients With DM or Renal Disease Organization Year Goal BP (mm Hg) Canadian Hypertension Society 2007 <130/80 American Diabetes Association 2006 <130/80 National Kidney Foundation 2004 <130/80 British Hypertension Society 2004 130/80 JNC 7 2003 <130/80 World Health Organization/ International Society of Hypertension 2003 <130/80 Chobanian AV et al, for the NHBPEPCC. Bethesda, Md: NHLBI; 2004. NIH Publication No. 04-5230. Available at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. JNC 7: Compelling Indications for Antihypertensive Drug Classes Recommended Drugs Compelling Indication Heart failure Post MI High coronary disease risk Diabetes Chronic kidney disease Recurrent stroke prevention Diuretic ACEI • • • • • • • • • and BB • • Aldo ARB CCB Ant • • • • • • • • • • Aldo Ant = aldosterone antagonist. Chobanian AV et al, for the NHBPEPCC. Bethesda, Md: NHLBI; 2004. NIH Publication No. 04-5230. Available at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. Hypertension and Diabetes: Global CV Risk Reduction With Evidence-Based Intervention Key Question On average, how many drugs will a patient need to control hypertension? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4 Use your keypad to vote now! ? Multiple Antihypertensive Agents Needed to Achieve BP Goal: ALLHAT 1 Drug 2 Drugs 3 Drugs % Controlled <140/90 mm Hg 100 Patients (%) 80 60 40 20 0 Baseline 6 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Patients had hypertension and at least 1 other CHD risk factor. N = 33357. Adapted from Cushman WC et al. J Clin Hypertens. 2002;4:393-404. Multiple Antihypertensive Agents Needed to Achieve BP Goal: Diabetes/Renal Impairment UKPDS (<150/85 mm Hg) MDRD (<92 mm Hg, MAP) HOT (<80 mm Hg, diastolic) AASK (<92 mm Hg, MAP) RENAAL (<140/90 mm Hg) IDNT (135/85 mm Hg) 1 2 3 Average No. of BP Medications Patients had either diabetes or renal impairment. Bakris GL et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:646-661; Brenner BM et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861869; Lewis EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851-860. 4 DM Approximately Doubles CVD Risk in Patients With Hypertension Study Patients With Patients Without Diabetes Diabetes (events per 1000 pt-yr) Ratio SHEP CV events 63.0 36.8 1.71 Stroke 28.8 15.0 1.92 CHD events 32.2 15.2 2.12 CV events 55.0 28.9 1.90 Stroke 26.6 12.3 2.16 CHD events 23.1 12.4 1.87 24.0 9.8 2.45 Syst-Eur HOT (DBP <90 mm Hg) CV events Adapted from Curb JD et al. JAMA. 1996;276:1886-1892; Hansson L et al. Lancet. 1998;351:1755-1762; Tuomilehto J et al. N Engl J Med. 1999:340:677-684. HOT Study: Fewer Major CV Events in Patients With Diabetes Randomized to Lower BP Goal P = .005 (per 1000 patient-years) Stroke, MI, or CV Death 25 20 15 10 5 0 80 85 90 Target DBP (mm Hg) Patients with hypertension and diabetes were given baseline felodipine, plus other agents in a 5-step regimen. Study N = 18790; diabetes n = 1501. HOT = Hypertension Optimal Treatment; MI = myocardial infarction. Adapted from Hansson L et al, for the HOT Study Group. Lancet. 1998;351:1755-1762. Syst-Eur: CV Protection Resulting From BP Lowering Was Greatest in Patients With Diabetes Reduction in Event Rate for Active Treatment Group (%) With Diabetes 0 –10 –20 Overall Mortality 8% P = .55 –30 –40 –50 Without Diabetes All CV CVD Events Mortality 16% P = .37 41% P = .09 –60 –70 25% P = .02 70% P = .01 62% P = .002 Fatal and Nonfatal Stroke 36% P = .02 69% P = .02 Fatal and Nonfatal Cardiac Events 22% P = .10 57% P = .06 Patients with hypertension received nitrendipine enalapril or HCTZ. N = 4695. Syst-Eur = Systolic Hypertension in Europe; CV = cardiovascular. Adapted from Tuomilehto J et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:677-684. UKPDS: Tight Glucose Versus Tight BP Control and CV Outcomes Tight glucose control (goal <6.0 mmol/L or 108 mg/dL) Tight BP control (average 144/82 mm Hg) Relative Risk Reduction (%) Stroke Any Diabetic Endpoint DM Deaths Microvascular Complications 0 -10 5% 10% 12% -20 24% * -30 32% * -40 -50 44% * 32% *P <.05 compared to tight glucose control Patients had hypertension and type 2 diabetes. N = 1148. Bakris GL et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:646-661. 37% * Currently Available Antihypertensive Medications: Mechanism of Action Drug Class Mechanism of Action Rid the body of excess fluids and sodium Diuretics through urination May enhance the effect of other BP medications ACEIs Lower levels of angiotensin II Expand blood vessels ARBs Block angiotensin II receptors Expand blood vessels BBs Decrease heart rate and cardiac output CCBs Interrupt movement of calcium into heart and vessel cells American Heart Association. December 11, 2006. Available at: http://americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=159. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) Angiotensinogen Kininogen Kallikrein Nitric Oxide Renin ACEIs Bradykinin Inactive Peptides Angiotensin I ACE Angiotensin II Blood Pressure Vascular Proliferation Oxidative Stress Vascular Inflammation Thrombogenesis ACEI AT1 ARB Adapted with permission from Brown NJ et al. Circulation. 1998;97:1411-1420. Endemann DH. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1983-1992. ARBs ARBs The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) Angiotensinogen Kininogen Renin Inhibitors Renin Kallikrein Bradykinin Angiotensin I ACE Inactive Peptides Angiotensin II ARBs Blood Pressure Vascular Proliferation Oxidative Stress Vascular Inflammation Thrombogenesis AT1 Adapted with permission from Brown NJ et al. Circulation. 1998;97:1411-1420; Endemann DH. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1983-1992. VALUE: Hazard Ratios for Prespecified Analyses in Patients With Hypertension at High CV Risk Hazard Ratio Valsartan/Amlodipine Primary cardiac composite endpoint Cardiac mortality Cardiac morbidity All myocardial infarction All congestive heart failure All stroke All-cause death New-onset diabetes 0.5 1 Favors Valsartan 2.0 Favors Amlodipine Patients had hypertension and were at high CV risk. VALUE = Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation. Julius S et al, for the VALUE trial group. Lancet. 2004;363:2022-2031. Event-Free Probability (%) Val-HeFT: HF Morbidity With ARB in Patients Not Receiving ACEIs 100 Valsartan (n = 185) Placebo (n = 181) 80 60 40 Risk Reduction 44% (P <.001) 20 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 Months 18 21 24 ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; HF = heart failure. Maggioni AP et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1414-1421. 27 VALIANT: ARBs in Secondary Prevention All-Cause Mortality (probability) Acute dual RAS blockade provides no significant benefit 0.4 Captopril 0.3 Valsartan Valsartan and captopril 0.2 0.1 Valsartan vs captopril: HR = 1.00; P = .982 Valsartan + captopril vs captopril: HR = 0.98; P = .726 0.0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Months Patients had post-MI HF or LVSD (EF <0.40). N = 14703. EF = ejection fraction; LVSD = left ventricular systolic dysfunction; MI = myocardial infarction; RAS = renin-angiotensin system; VALIANT = Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial. Pfeffer M et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1893-1906. All-Cause Mortality (%) COMET: Primary Endpoint of Mortality 40 Metoprolol Carvedilol 30 20 HR = 0.83 95% CI, 0.74-0.93 P = .0017 10 0 0 1 2 3 Time (years) Carvedilol n = 1511; metoprolol n = 1518. COMET = Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial. Poole-Wilson PA et al. Lancet. 2003;362:7-13. 4 5 OR (95% CL) for the Occurrence of MI ACEI Versus Placebo: Effect on MI 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.3 3.0 3.1 Years Patients had HF and/or LVD. Strauss MD, Hall A. Circulation. 2006;114:838-854. 3.4 3.5 EUROPA: CV Death/MI/Cardiac Arrest Placebo 20% Risk Reduction HR = 0.80 (0.71–0.91) P = .0003 Perindopril 8 mg Time (years) Percent 15 10 5 Time (years) 0 0 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 HOPE: CV Death/MI/Stroke Placebo 22% Risk Reduction HR = 0.78 (0.70–0.86) Ramipril P <.001 10 mg 20 Percent 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 PEACE: CV Death/MI/CABG/PCI 4% Risk Reduction Placebo HR = 0.96 (0.88–1.06) P = .43 Trandolapril 4 mg Time (years) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 QUIET: All CV Events 4% Risk Increase HR = 1.04 (0.89–1.22) P = .6 50 Percent Percent ACEI Trials in CAD Without HF: Primary Outcomes 40 30 4 Quinapril 20 mg Placebo 20 10 Time (years) 0 0 1 2 EUROPA Investigators. Lancet. 2003;362:782-788; HOPE Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145-153; PEACE Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2058-2068; Pitt B, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:1058-1063. 3 Primary Outcome (%) MICRO-HOPE, PERSUADE: CV Events in Patients With Diabetes MICRO-HOPE (n = 3577) CV death/MI/stroke 25 25 PERSUADE (n = 1502) CV death/MI/cardiac arrest Placebo 20 Placebo 20 25% RRR P = .0004 15 19% RRR P = .13 15 10 5 Perindopril 8 mg 10 Ramipril 10 mg 5 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 Follow-Up (years) 5 0 1 2 3 4 Follow-Up (years) 5 HOPE Study Investigators. Lancet. 2000;355:253-259; Daly CA et al. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1369-1378. MICRO-HOPE: Albuminuria in Patients With Diabetes Mean Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (urine) 3.0 Placebo 2.5 Ramipril 2.0 P = .02 1.5 P = .001 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 1 2 Time (y) HOPE Study Investigators. Lancet. 2000;355:253-259. 3 4-5 The Data Support Global CV Risk Management CV disease remains the leading cause of death in both men and women in the United States Framingham data show that CV risk factors tend to cluster—and that risk of death from CHD and stroke increases proportionately Endothelial dysfunction seems to be a key factor in the development of CV disease Recent clinical trials have given us a wealth of information with which to manage global CV risk Adherence CV Risk Factor Control Among Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes Fewer than half of adults with diabetes achieve treatment goals for CV risk factors NHANES III (n = 1204) NHANES 1999-2000 (n = 370) 60 Adults (%) 50 40 48.2 44.3 37.0 35.8 33.9 29.0 30 20 10 0 5.2 A1C Level <7% 7.3 Blood Pressure Total Cholesterol* Achieved All 3 <130/80 mm Hg <200 mg/dL Treatment Goals *LDL-C and TG not evaluated. Saydah SH, et al. JAMA. 2004;291:335-342. Practical Tips to Improve Adherence Talk to your patient Explain the condition and why specific therapy is important Ask about adherence Involve the patient as a partner in treatment Provide clear written and oral instructions Tailor the regimen to the patient’s lifestyle and needs Use motivational interviewing techniques Look for: Different ways to approach patients based on individual patient attitudes Allies in patient care—family, friends Ways to simplify the regimen Refill dates (if the patient has not refilled the prescription, the medication is not being taken) Ockene IS et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:630-640. Practical Tips to Improve Adherence Use systematic approaches Disease management programs Periodic review of electronic medical records or manual chart audits Group/shared medical appointments—blend care, education, social support Other techniques Follow-up (telephone/mail/e-mail) and reminder cards Signed agreements/contracts Self-monitoring tools (eg, tape measure, pedometer, home testing devices) Patient assistance programs Support patients where medication costs are a barrier to adherence Fonarow GC et al. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:819-822; Ockene IS et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40: 630-640; NCEP ATP III. September 2002. NIH publication no. 02-5215; Pfizer Helpful Answers Web site. Available at: http://www.pfizerhelpfulanswers.com. Case Study Case Study: 55-Year-Old Asian Man With Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Physical examination BP: 148/96 mm Hg Height: 64" Weight: 178 lb BMI: 30 kg/m2 Waist circumference: 38" Cardiac dysfunction status: normal ventricular function (LVEF 68%) Laboratory values Glucose: 148 mg/dL (fasting) A1C: 8.8% Creatinine: 1.5 mg/dL Urinalysis: 1+ proteinuria Lipid profile (mg/dL): TC: 268; LDL-C: 168; HDL-C: 42; TG: 296 Medications HCTZ 25 mg/d Glyburide 5 mg/d Decision Point What is the JNC 7 goal for this patient who has hypertension, diabetes, and renal disease? 1. <120/80 mm Hg 2. <130/80 mm Hg 3. <140/80 mm Hg 4. <140/90 mm Hg Use your keypad to vote now! ? Decision Point The patient’s BP is 148/96 mm Hg while taking HCTZ 25 mg/d and glyburide 5 mg/d. To bring BP down to <130/80 mm Hg, you would add a(n): 1. BB 2. CCB 3. ARB 4. ACE Use your keypad to vote now! ? Q&A PCE Takeaways PCE Takeaways 1. Patients with hypertension often present with multiple cardiac risk factors 2. Be vigilant in your investigation of all clinical indicators 3. Creatively address patient adherence; not everyone responds to the same interventions 4. Clinical inertia is the enemy—don't settle for "close enough" Key Question How important is using an antihypertensive agent with proven risk reduction (reducing morbidity and mortality) when choosing medications for your patients with hypertension? 1. Not important 2. Slightly important 3. Somewhat important 4. Extremely important Use your keypad to vote now! ?