Transcript Document

Dedicated MCM Force Issues:
Force Structure
&
Modernization
Outline
• Role of Dedicated & Organic MCM Forces
• Dedicated Force Structure Requirements
• Recent Changes - Shifts in Planning
• Dedicated Force Modernization
• Future Transitions
• Conclusion
MCM Roles
(Organic vs. Dedicated)
• Organic MCM Systems
– CVBG/ARG defense
• Locate & avoid potential threat areas
• Punch-Through / Egress if mine threat is encountered
• Dedicated MCM Forces
– High level clearance of larger areas / multiple regions
– Enable maritime force penetration and sustained operations
in a mine threat environment
– Follow-on Clearance for Joint & Strategic Objectives
• Joint / Combined Force access, logistics and sustainment
• Humanitarian Relief
• Resuming Commerce
Organic and Dedicated MCM systems
Today have separate roles
MCM Capabilities
(Organic vs. Dedicated)
Organic
•
Environment
Dedicated
•
– Blue Water (Deep)
– Littoral (High Burial/Clutter)
– Blue Water
•
Capabilities
•
Supported Operations
– Choke Point Egress
– Limited CVBG/ESF OPAREAs
Organic & Dedicated MCM
Systems Have Separate
Capabilities in the Near Term
Capabilities
– High Area Coverage Rate for
Moored/Bottom Mine Reconn
– Full Clearance of Large OPAREAs
& Long Q-Routes
– Rapid Sweep / High Clearance
Levels for ALL Bottom Conditions
– High Area Coverage Rate for
Floating/Drifting Mines
– Reconn for Moored/Bottom Mines
– Limited Punch Through
•
Environment
•
Supported Operations
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
SPOD approaches/SLOCs
CVBG/ESF OPAREAs
Amphibious Assault
Strategic Sealift SPODs
C/J/MLOTs
TBMD/FSA Boxes
Harbors / Ports
Environment Drives Tactics
(Hunt vs. Sweep)
Clearance Level (%)
Large Combat Radius, High Power, High Speed
Sweeping Platforms Offer the Best Advantage for
Maximum Clearance & Minimum Time / Risk in a
Less than Optimal Environment
100
(High Speed)
(Station Time/Combat Rad)
50
(High Power)
0
Poor
Excellent
Bottom Conditions (Clutter, Roughness, Burial)
Blue Water
Littoral (Brown Water)
HUNTING Level of Effort
(How Bottom Conditions Effect Mine Hunting a Port Channel)
100
Clearance Level (%)
90
Clearance
Objective
95%
80
70
60
50
Type A1
40
Recon
Objective
64%
Type B1
30
Type C1
AMCM
Sweeping
95%
20
10
Type D1
0
Days
Weeks
Time to Clear
Months
• Role of Dedicated & Organic MCM Forces
 Dedicated Force Structure Requirements
• Recent Changes - Shifts in Planning
• Dedicated Force Modernization
• Future Transitions
• Conclusion
Dedicated MCM Force Performance in OIF
• Total Assets
–
–
–
–
–
–
2 MCMRONs
CMWC OPDET
2 AMCM Squadrons
14 SMCM Ships (8 U.S. and 6 U.K.)
8 U.S. EOD dets (plus U.K. and AUS dets)
NSCT ONE
• Umm Qsar Q-Route Effort
– MCM missions conducted during ongoing combat operations
– MH-53Es towing MK-106 mine sweeping sleds completed
clearance against the bottom Influence threat in less than 2 Days
– Allied SMCM
• Conducted Hunting Operations for Moored & Bottom Mines
• Conducted Channel Conditioning to clear remaining Bottom Objects
– UMCM cleared Umm Qsar harbor
– Interdiction was key to success
• Disrupted Iraqi Plan to lay hundreds of mines
• Fewer than 10 mines total were found
OIF vs. Other OPLANs
• OIF required clearance of 1 Q-Route
• Several OPLANs require over 5 times the Q-Route
effort tasked in OIF
• Other tasks in addition to Q-Routes include:
– Large OPAREAs
• CVOAs
• AOAs
– Multiple TBMD / FSA areas
– C/J/MLOTS areas
• CMWC force level analysis validates the need for the
current level of AMCM, SMCM & UMCM Dedicated
forces to execute a single OPLAN
Current Dedicated Force Structure meets
minimum requirements for DPG / OPLANs
• Role of Dedicated & Organic MCM Forces
• Dedicated Force Structure Requirements
 Recent Changes - Shifts in Planning
• Dedicated Force Modernization
• Future Transitions
• Conclusion
Recent Changes – Shifts in Planning
• New Environmental Data
– Collected during USS Inchon WESTPAC ’01
deployment and during white hull surveys
– Indicates poorer mine hunting conditions than
estimated in original OPLAN analysis
– Result:
• More sweeping is required than originally planned to
achieve clearance objectives
• Level of effort & clearance timelines may increase
• Increasing Homeland Security/Defense
Requirement
– Operational planning now includes apportionment
of dedicated for homeland defense
• Role of Dedicated & Organic MCM Forces
• Dedicated Force Structure Requirements
• Recent Changes - Shifts in Planning
 Dedicated Force Modernization
• Future Transitions
• Conclusion
AMCM Modernization
• Recent system upgrades are Highly
Successful
– Upgrade of the MK-106 Mod 4 was Critical to
Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF):
• System Availability significantly improved
• Accounted for ALL of U.S. sweeping in OIF
• Achieved the FULL clearance objective against the
bottom threat in the Umm Qsar Q-Route in 2 days
– AQS-14 Upgrade to AQS-24 provides I.D.
capability, improved resolution and higher system
reliability
• MH-53E SLEP is required to continue
Dedicated AMCM capability beyond 2008
SMCM Modernization
• Re-Engining is required NOW & is Behind schedule
– Both engine types I.F. & Waukesha require replacement
• I.F. engine MTBF rate < 400 hrs
• Waukesha parts no longer available
• Sweep System upgrades
– Acoustic Sweep
– Mag Cables
– Stern Hydraulics
• Other Combat Systems
– Com/Nav upgrades
– SQQ-32 Software
– OK-520 Winch
• ILS Support
– Too many parts are not carried by supply system (J-Coded)
– Long lead time due to:
• Not readily available in the commercial market
• Required to be manufactured with special alloys (non-ferrous)
UMCM Modernization
• Continue to fund 8 MCM EOD Det & MMS
Capability
• Fully Field NSCT ONE Capability
– Small Boats
– UUVs
• Role of Dedicated & Organic MCM Forces
• Dedicated Force Structure Requirements
• Recent Changes - Shifts in Planning
• Dedicated Force Modernization
 Future Transitions
• Conclusion
Near Term
(Next 5 Yrs)
• Organic systems will have taken over 15 years to
develop and deliver if they remain on schedule for
fielding in FY06.
• Organic systems will provide the Battle Group with a
critical MCM capability that it does not have today.
However:
– Organic systems are hunt centric, designed/optimized for
operations in an excellent hunting environment
– Marginal to Poor environmental conditions exist in the
majority of OPLAN littoral areas – in these areas Organic
system performance will be degraded
• Dedicated systems must be FULLY resourced in the
near term to preclude capability gaps and increased
risk to OPLANs
Mid Term
(5 – 10 Yrs)
• It is envisioned that several years of additional
development will be required before technology
will enable MCM systems to operate on smaller
Organic platforms and meet / exceed today’s
Dedicated system capability.
• During the Mid term:
– Dedicated & Organic capability will be required
– Technology advances envisioned to enable Far term
shifts in roles (merge of systems, platforms)
Near & Mid term capability must include
both Dedicated & Organic systems
Dedicated Force Requirement
• Near / Mid Term (5 – 10 Yrs)
– Maintain & Modernize Dedicated Forces in High Risk
Areas
• Prevent Gaps in Capability
• Both Dedicated & Organic systems and platforms can
leverage off of new technology
– Field Organic capability to perform the Organic Role
• Far Term (> 10 Yrs)
– Merge Dedicated and Organic Forces
Conclusion
•
Organic and Dedicated MCM systems have separate roles Today:
–
–
Organic: CVBG/ARG defense in lower threat deep water (Reconn & Punch-Through)
Dedicated: Full/Sustained Clearance in littoral & blue water environment
•
•
•
•
•
Significant technology advances must occur before Organic will be able to
perform Dedicated force capabilities
Dedicated MCM force structure is minimum required for DPG. Any reduction
in Dedicated forces in the Near Term will result in increased risk to OPLAN
execution
Recent changes place increased demand on Dedicated forces
–
–
•
Larger-scale maritime operations
Supports Joint/Combined operations
New environmental data indicates poorer mine hunting conditions in all AORs
Homeland Security / Defense requirement increasing
Dedicated forces require continued modernization to ensure readiness
CMWC Priorities:
–
–
–
AMCM SLEP
SMCM Re-Engining and Combat System Upgrades
UMCM full NSCT Capability
• Organic does NOT replace Dedicated in near or mid term
• Dedicated requires continued modernization
Questions?
Ship of Opportunity
(Integrated USMC/MCM Force Package)
• Integrated USMC / MCM Force Package is being developed /
validated
– CMWC working with MCCDC
– Next validation during west coast JTFEX
– Follow-on validation during east coast JTFEX with HSV and SoO
• Structure
– MCM triad
• AMCM, SMCM, UMCM (Incl NSCT ONE)
• Intel / Logistics / IMA support
– ACE –
– Infantry Battalion
• Missions
– MCS for MCM triad
• C2 with Flag and/or MCMRON Staff(s) embarked
• Force protection for MCM assets
–
–
–
–
ISR
Special Operations / Exploitation
MIO (incl monitoring for re-seeding)
Green/Blue Crown