Transcript Folie 1 - ENTSOG

ENTSO-E IT project for
Fundamental Electricity Data
Transparency
ENTSO-G
Transparency Workshop
11 September 2012
Andy Spiceley
Project Manager, National Grid
The new ENTSO-E Transparency platform
• Regulation on transparency in electricity markets
• ENTSO-E obligations & REMIT
• Existing transparency platform
• Project focus and structure
• Procurement exercise
• Outline of new platform structure
• Project schedule & roadmap
• Key challenges & critical success factors
Legal hierarchy of the regulations
DIRECTIVE 2009/72/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE
COUNCIL
of 13 July 2009
concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity
Regulation
714/2009
Network Codes
and Transparency
Regulation
Handbook
Regulation
1227/2011
(REMIT)
Implementing
acts
But this handbook established by
ENTSO-E is NOT law but agreed best
practices within the industry
Elaboration of the Fundamental Electricity
Data Transparency Regulation
2010:ERGEG elaboration of a draft
Guideline in close cooperation with ENTSO-E
ERGEG advice on comitology guidelines
on fundamental electricity data transparency (7/12/2010)
EC Public consultation on the ERGEG Proposal
(Summer 2011) before proposal of a Commission Regulation
2012-2013 : Comitology process
July 21, 2015
4
The scope of the ENTSO-E Transparency policy
Long-term
(years)
Some Market
needs
Building of new
power plants,
Long-term
contracts
Examples of
ENTSOE
answer
Aims of the
Fundamental Data
Transparency
guideline
Mid-term
(months)
Short-term and
ex-post
(days)
Maintenance of
power plants
Supplying
contracts
Spot and intraday
exchanges
Winter and
summet outlooks
Statistical
publications
Market data on
entsoe.net
Market data on
entsoe.net
TYNDP
Transparency
Policy
Data feed for REMIT
ENTSO-E
Transparency platform
FEDT
REMIT
systems
Next Steps for the Transparency Regulation
DGcomp
issues
resolved
Text
Finalised
?
?
EC Interservice
Electricity
XB
Consultation
Committee
Aug
End Sept
Approval
Parliament
Review
End Oct
+3 months
Adoption
and
Publish in
Official
Journal
+6 weeks
Translation
3 weeks
www.entsoe.net








Simple and easy to use
34 countries, 41 TSO
Data providers – TSOs, PX, Auction offices, 3rd parties.
Users – traders, consultants, European Commission, ACER,
Universities, individuals.
Each TSO has a single point of contact – Transparency
Platform Coordinator (TPC)
More than 5 years old
not suitable basis for evolution to support all FEDT under
regulation
Provides valuable operating experience & user feedback
Data subject scope & growth
entsoe.net
Load
Generation
Transmission
Outage
Balancing
EMFIP
Three challenges, three streams
External coordination : EC, ACER, Brussels stakeholders
ACER
Supervision
Close
cooperation
required
Internal coordination : MIT, TPC, EDI, PM
BRS
IG
IT Project
Regional projects : TSOs information flows
41 Transparency
Projects
Transparency
Project
Steering
Group
Stakeholder Engagement
• Expert groups: Load, Generation, Transmission,
Balancing, IT/Other, Definitions
• Planning of stakeholder meetings for the
Handbook preparation
 Definitions review
 Business Requirements Specification (BRS)
 Implementation Guide – Role, Writers,
Deadline, Link between documents
Stakeholders Kick-off Workshop
• Invitation to Transparency Stakeholder Advisory Group
• Timing: following DGener/DGcomp agreement & final draft
proposal
• Scope:
Terms of Reference
Explanation of Regulation
Explanation of EMFIP
Data Definitions
Handbook – xml schemas, mapping data etc.
Links to REMIT / UMM
Project structure & governance
ENTSO-E board
Strategic Data
Governance
Transparency Project
Steering Group
(TPSG)
Market Committee
WG EDI
WG MIT
TPC
User groups
Domain
expert teams
EMFIP
IT project
Core teams – advocates, champions, experts
BRS
Beta testing
IGs
subjects
Detailed
Def’ns
Core teams
subjects
Handbook
subjects
Compliance &
interoperability
IT supplier procurement
• Process defined and co-ordinated for ENTSO-E by EirGrid
• Activity supported by team of TPC volunteers from TSOs
• Pre-qualification phase – questionnaire and evaluation –
selection of shortlist
• Development of Request for Proposals
• Call for Tender materials
– Scope of Services
– Requirements Catalogue
– Assessment criteria
• Market Consultation sessions
• Submission and evaluation of bids
• Final interviews and contract negotiation
IT solution scope
Web presence
Technical overview
IT Project - next steps
• Detailed planning & release schedule
• Elaboration of requirements
• Development and alignment of technical architecture
• Test definitions
• Migration strategy
Evolution of business requirements
Regulation drafting ………. Comitology process
Draft
Regulation
Initial
drafts
review
Propose &
agree
resolution
Generate
revised doc
final
Regulation
revise
revise
Data model
drafting
Stakeholder
review
Releases – Roadmap
2013
Q1
Q2
Q3
2014
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Implentation
deadline
Regulation
Existing platform operational
archive use only
EMFIP live (as “entsoe.net”?)
EMFIP Releases:
takeover entsoe.net
1
Additional data sets
2
Final release: all data sets
3
Key challenges & success factors
 Timeline for Regulation & project scope impacts
 Maintain continuity of service
 Co-ordination with Data Providers project development
 Stakeholder engagement
 Communication with Data Providers
 Support of Working Group expert teams
Thank You
[email protected]