Transcript Slide 1

Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master text styles
Second
level
IAP2
Canada
Third
level General Meeting
Annual
Fourth28,
level
April
2015
Fifth level
IAP2 Canada champions the practice
of people-focused approaches to
support sustainable relationships and
outcomes.
2
Agenda
1
Call to Order / Welcome /
Quorum Check
2
Adoption of Agenda
3
4
5
Treasurer’s Report
6
Approval of 2015-2016 Board
7
New Business
Approval of Minutes from
April 24, 2014 AGM
Key Accomplishments in 2014
and Plans for 2015
3
Key Accomplishments in 2014
• First Canadian Core Values Awards
• IAP2 North American Conference in Winnipeg
• Member Services
• Communications
• Mentorship
• Learning Webinars
• New Chapters
• Organizational Stability
• Research
4
Looking ahead in 2015+
5
Membership Update
6
Membership Update
7
Treasurer’s Report
Motion: To grant the IAP2 Canada Board of
Directors the authority to move from an annual audit
to an audit every two years.
8
Treasurer’s Report
9
Departing Board and Deputy Board
Members
THANK YOU
■ Tiffany Skomro (Vice President)
■ Kristin Drewes (Treasurer)
■ Maria de Bruijn (Research lead)
■ Kevin Thorvaldson (Membership lead)
■ Natalie Seniuk (partial term)
■ Pattie LaCroix (partial term)
■ Kent Aitken (Deputy)
■ Meghan Bratt (Deputy)
■ Luc Richard (Deputy)
10
Nominations Committee &
Board Elections
Deputy Board Members
■ Emily Buck (Calgary)
■ Julie Reid Forget (Montreal)
New Board Members (2015-2017)
■ Bruce Gilbert (St. John’s)
■ Amanda Mitchell (Vancouver)
■ Brenda Pichette (Ottawa)
■ Tracy Vaughan (Vancouver)
■ Ashleigh Weeden (Ariss, Ontario)
Your new 2015-2016 IAP2 Canada Board
■ Chris Gurski (Toronto)
■ Violetta Ilkiw (Toronto)
■ Sarah Rivest (Calgary)
■ David Turner (Calgary)
Continuing Board Members (2014-2016)
■ Jan Bloomfield (Edmonton)
■ Dejana Knih (Calgary)
■ Hugo Mimee (Montreal)
■ Noreen Rude (Calgary)
■ Anne Harding, Past President (Calgary)
11
New Business?
2014 Annual Report
12
DISCUSSION
Questions
1.What about the IAP2 Spectrum works well?
2.What are the limitations of the IAP2 Spectrum and how might those be
addressed?
3.Over the last 25 years ago, IAP2 has advanced the practice of meaningful
public participation. How can we continue to advance the practice in the public
engagement environment of today and tomorrow?
4.Other? What else should we be taking into consideration?
IAP2 Spectrum
IAP2 Spectrum Discussion Forum
13