Transcript Metaphysics

Languages, reason and
metaphysics
TOK202
1
Languages
TOK202
2
Human language
• Using words is different from the communication
of other species in the wild.
• Humans have two sorts of communication
– Body language, like all other species. Emotional
responses, which we don’t have much control over.
– The human language with words. Symbols with a
certain meaning, which refer to something in the world
we share with other humans. Grouped words makes
statements.
TOK202
3
What do words mean?
• A dog – all dogs
– A particular dog – the idea of a dog
• Is the idea inside or outside your mind?
• The meaning of words is hard to pin down.
• The meaning of words is something of a
mystery.
TOK202
4
Meaning - agreement
• Language is like a game with rules which
you generally have to follow.
• The meaning of a word is based on a social
agreement. This agreement exists before
the individual.
TOK202
5
What do sentences mean?
• By constructing sentences the rules of language come into
play.
• A meaning of a sentence can not be reduced to the
particular words it consists of. The construction of a
sentence has a goal to express a true statement of the “real
world”.
• The meaning of a sentence usually depends on the context.
The context may be social, or it may be other sentences.
• Much of what is said and written assumes a certain
knowledge in the listener/reader. If this assumption is
wrong, the meaning may be lost or distorted.
TOK202
6
Thoughts and words
• When I say something my brain is sending
the message to the mouth.
– Brain produces language.
•
•
•
•
•
Are thoughts words?
How do “I” think?
Am “I” then talking to itself?
Can I think without a language?
Consciousness !!!?? Language
TOK202
7
Language and knowledge
• When a child learns a language, he/she
learns how the world is constructed - in a
sociocultural context.
• Knowledge is embedded in language.
TOK202
8
Reason and logic
TOK202
9
Reason
• “Reason” for the purposes of this unit encompasses the
following terms:
– Logical rigor, critical thinking, logic, deductive logic,
deduction and induction.
• Together with sense perception, emotion and language,
reason is a fundamental tool that enables us, knowers, to
construct a knowledge base we can share with each other.
• Historically:
– Reason became valuable as a way to rebel against authority.
• Types of propositions:
– Analytic, empirical, value judgment, metaphysical
– (Truth tests: analytic proposition = coherence truth test,
empirical proposition = correspondence truth test)
TOK202
10
Important definitions and
distinctions
• “True” versus “valid”.
A proposition is true or false (=truth test).
An argument is valid or invalid.
• Argument:
– A series of premises followed by conclusion.
• Syllogism:
– A deductive argument.
• Fallacy:
– An invalid argument, i.e. an argument in which the
conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
TOK202
11
Deductive versus inductive reasoning
• Deduction begins with a general statement (All, Non,
Some...) and reaches a conclusion about a particular case
(Bill, the cat...)
All people have ten fingers
Bill is a person
..Bill has ten fingers
This is an example of valid deductive syllogism. All
arguments of the form:
All P is Q
P___________
..Q
are valid, no matter what P and Q stand for.
TOK202
12
“Induction”
• Induction begins with observations of
particular instances and arrives at a general
conclusion:
My grand parents, my parents, my siblings have ten fingers
All people I know have ten fingers
All people my friends know have ten fingers
(X number of further observations required here:" Inductive leap”)
..All people have ten fingers
It suffices that one counter-example be found to counter zillion
observations.
• The empirical propositions used as premises in a deductive
argument must be arrived at inductively.
TOK202
13
Informal logic
• does not demand that the reasoning be
laid in any particular form, but in every
speech and every text there is logic,
otherwise it would be nonsense. But
there are many errors made in logical
thinking, sometimes by purpose and
sometimes not.
TOK202
14
Metaphysics
The branch of philosophy that deals
with the basic questions about reality.
Examples:
Determinism versus indeterminism
Materialism versus idealism
TOK202
15
Determinism-> causal principle
• Everything that happens is determined by prior causes.
• Every event is the necessary result of the chain of causes
leading up to it, chain that runs infinitely into the past.
• The state of the universe at any particular moment could
not be otherwise
• From a given state of the universe there can only be one
possible future.
• All future states of the universe are – in principle –
completely predictable.
TOK202
16
Science and determinism
• The mechanistic deterministic view of the
world has been a basic presupposition of
modern science over the past four centuries.
• Most of the progress of science over that
time is based on the principle that the
universe is a system of objects moving and
interacting according to fixed natural laws.
TOK202
17
The practice of science?
• To find “the natural laws” and “puzzle” the
entire reality with explanations according to
the natural laws
• A scientific theory’s ability to predict an
outcome of an experiment has been a
crucial moment for it’s scientific value.
TOK202
18
Quantum mechanics denies determinism!
• A crucial part of quantum mechanics is the
indeterminacy principle:
– The behavior of individual electrons in certain
circumstances are not causally determined and
therefore impossible to predict.
– We can predict that a certain part of a bounce of
electrons in a given situation will behave in a certain
way but we cannot be sure how any particular
electron will behave.
• The indeterminacy, is not a matter of our own
uncertainty; it inheres in nature.
TOK202
19
Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr
• Albert said to Niels:
‘God does not play dice’
• Niels reply:
‘Albert stop telling God what to do!’
TOK202
20
Chaos theory
• There are some systems and subsystems
that are so complex, and in which small
variations in initial conditions can lead to
such massively different outcomes, that
accurate predictions are impossible.
• Chaos theory is compatible with both
determinism an indeterminism.
TOK202
21
Freedom versus determinism
• Common sense tells us that we have
• free will.
• Classical sciences view of the world and the success of the
sciences provide good reason for accepting determinism.
TOK202
22
Free will
• Practical freedom
– Is to do what one wishes, to realize one’s
desires.
• Metaphysical freedom
– Freedom of the will
– Means being ultimately responsible for one’s
choices
TOK202
23
Determinism is true, freedom is an
illusion
• Hard determinism:
– The “free” choices of human individuals are
like anything else in the universe subject to the
causality law
TOK202
24
Defending free will
• By intuition
– I feel that I am making free choices, choosing between
Coke or Pepsi, coffee or tea.
– A very persuasive argument but simple and not very
convincing after a closer look.
• Moral institutions rest on the assumption that we
are free.
– If we are not acting freely no one is truly responsible
for any of their actions. Not very convincing either.
TOK202
25
Attack on determinism’s own internal coherence
• Determinism seems to undermine a basic
presupposition of rational discussion, because
their conclusion is only the predetermined
outcome of a long causal chain.
• Ideally, at least we ought to arrive at our
theoretical beliefs solely on the basis of evidence
and argumentation.
TOK202
26
Soft determinism
• Hobbs, Lock and Hume accept Practical
freedom as a notion of free will.
• They are criticized for superficial
plausibility
• With closer look they still end up with hard
determinism.
TOK202
27
Indeterminism?
• How is free will possible?
• Volition= an act of will which is free of
being caused, is not an effect of anything;
just occurs.
• If it just happens then you do not govern it!
• The quantum mechanics model?
• Some mental event which is nonmaterial,
free from physical laws (soul)?
TOK202
28
Indeterminism versus determinism!
• Is there a free will or is it not?
TOK202
29
Idealism versus materialism
TOK202
30
Some examples of materialism from
history of philosophy
• Thales 585 B.C., the first of philosophers:
– A uniform reality underlies the many ways things appear to us, that
reality is water
• Democritos 420 B.C. suggested atoms
• Empedocles 500-430 B.C..
– Earth, water, air and fire
• Physicalism, the modern atomic theory
– Different elements are composed of the same stuff:
• Electrons, neutrons, protons and so on.
– The word physicalism is supposed to cover the relativity theory of
matter and energy are interchangeable as a version of materialism.
TOK202
31
Materia – Consciousness
• Materialism-determinism-free will is an illusion
• Materialism in metaphysics is
– The reality is essentially material
– All explanations must ultimately be descriptions of
material entities and processes.
• Where does consciousness come in?
TOK202
32
Materialism versus idealism
• Which is more prior or basic the physical or the
mental?
• Physicalism views the physical as primary.
– Matter is prior to minds
– Matter is more fundamental than minds
– Matter existed before minds - temporal priority
• Idealism is the opposite view that gives priority to
the mind.
– Christian tradition - god is a pure spirit
• Creation - soul ...
TOK202
33
Idealism
• Religious • Naive • Modern - Immanuel Kant 1724-1804:
– Transcendental idealism
• The world we inhabit and science describes has
the character it does, because it is known by us.
• Mind does not create the world but it does shape
it at a very deep level...
TOK202
34
“Things in them selves” according to Kant
• The world as it appears to us is not reality as it is
in itself.
• The world in itself is the source of our experience.
• The things in themselves are not objects for
experience.
• Our experience provides the ‘content’ of our
sense-perceptions, which our mind renders
intelligible through the imposition of form.
TOK202
35