Corbett School District

Download Report

Transcript Corbett School District

Master Plan 2014

Grade School Middle School Athletics Multi-Purpose High School Site Aerial

School districts cannot use public resources to advocate a position on a ballot measure.

Bond Language must include

   The purpose for which the bonds will be used. The amount and term of the bonds. The kind of bonds proposed for issue.

Pre-Bond Define & Establish Needs Educational & Curricular Safety & Security Operational & Maintenance Community Outreach Establish a Project Budget Design Community Outreach/Live Design Design a project to meet the needs and aesthetics of the community.

Confirm Budget Construction

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Design  Establish Stakeholder Input Process  Community Based Design Meetings / Live Design  Establish multiple design solutions and seek community feedback.

 Check the designs against the fixed budget. Adjust and prioritize the elements of the design to ensure on budget delivery.

 Get community approval of the direction.

 Fine tune the design with the specialists, science, speech etc.

 Roll out the final concept for public comment and adjustment.

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

What does a resident only school look like?

 Enrollment will drop from 1115 (+/-) students to 700 (+/-) students.

  This will result in a 50% drop in revenue.

Reduce 4 bus drivers, 3 teacher aides, 1 janitor, 2 principals and 1 office staff   Reduce teaching staff from 62 to

16.8

Due to the required teaching specialties, Special Ed, PE and high school language the teaching staff would in reality be even smaller.

 The average class size would be

41.66

BUT in reality because of the required specialists some classes would be more than 50 students per room. It is not possible to get 41.66 students in any of our existing classrooms.

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Break up into small groups and discuss what are the most pressing needs of the district:

      Improved Teaching Spaces  Acoustical   Daylighting Ventilation, fresh air  Larger Classrooms Better Space Utilization Seismic Safety Energy Conservation Investment in the Future Parking & Traffic Turn in 3x5 cards Discuss the Issues

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Existing Existing High School Existing Middle School Athletic Building Classrooms 15 10 1 26 New Senario One (Retain existing 1950's Science Lab) New High School High School Converted to Middle School 16 15 Recover Library for District Office, staff work room, SPED Office Athletic Building -5 1 27 New Senario Two (Replace existing Science w/ 2 New Labs) New High School High School Converted to Middle School 16 15 Recover Library for District Office, staff work room, SPED Office New Science Building Old Science Lab to become maintenance -5 2 0 28 Elementary School Middle School High School Gross School Size by Student Recommended Corbett Enrollment Gross SF/Student Standard* 110 120-150 160-200 Current SF 47,188 SF 15,611 SF 60,085 SF 122,885 SF 420 275 420 Existing Corbett SF/Student 112 57 143 * NCEF, North Dakota High School w/ New & Science Middle School at High School 67,871 SF 22,268 SF 420 275 162 81 Existing & New Areas Elementary School Existing High School Existing Middle School Athletics Building New Middle School New Science Labs 47,188 SF 22,268 SF Without Athletics 15,611 SF 26,895 SF 25,861 SF 4,193 SF

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

 

A walkthrough of one potential solution.

 Please help us develop other ideas and options.

 How do we make the transition between what we have and what we need? (temporary classrooms)

Feedback from the participants.

  What other solutions should we explore?

Where should we go from here?

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Dining Existing High School Athletics New 2 Story High School Building Future Parking (+43) New Science Building New Locker Rooms Firetruck Turn Around Campus Plan

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Gathering Courtyard Dining Middle School Athletics Future Parking (+43) Campus Plan

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Title 9 Locker Rooms

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Temporary Classrooms

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Science Building Campus Plan

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Science Building Floor Plan

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Science Building

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Wind Screens on Covered Walkway Science Building

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

New High School Campus Plan

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

High School 1st Floor

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

High School 2 nd Floor

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

High School North Perspective

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

High School Entry Perspective

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

South High School Entry / Courtyard

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS

 

Wednesday September the 24

th

at 7:00pm

  Review updated concept based on 1 st meetings feedback Report on 3x5 card statistics    Discuss how to resolve outstanding issues

Wednesday October 8

th

at 7:00pm

 Discuss further refinement and options Small group issues discussion Review updated concept based on 2 nd meeting   Group prioritize issues Propose solutions

SODERSTROM

ARCHITECTS