Transcript Document

Postgraduate Research
Tutors Forum 2011
Part 1
Introduction to the Role and
Responsibilities of Postgraduate Tutor
Dr Peter Gardner
Jackie Findlay
Tutors
Dr Peter Gardner
• Chair of Graduate Board’s Programmes of Study and Audit Group
Jackie Findlay
• Senior Assistant Registrar, Research Student Administration
Aim
To introduce new postgraduate research tutors to the
responsibilities of their new position as defined in the
University Code of Practice for Research Degree
Candidatures
(available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/rsa/policies.html)
The code is based on the QAA Code of Practice for
assurance of academic quality and standards in higher
education: Section 1 Postgraduate Research Programmes
– September 2004
Based around 27 precepts [www.qaa.ac.uk]
Overview
Administrative Framework
Postgraduate Research Tutor - Role and Responsibilities
Phases of a candidature
Submission and Qualification Rates
Funding
Handover
Summary
Administrative Framework
Senate
Graduate Board
Research Student Administration
Programmes of Study and Audit Group
Examinations Group
Higher Doctorates
Postgraduate Scholarships
Researcher Training and Career Development Steering Group
Steering Committee on Doctoral Training Grants
9 x Faculty Graduate School Committees (Director)
School
Postgraduate Research Tutor
Student file/PDRS
Supervisor
Student file/PDRS
Student
Graduate Board
Responsible for research students
• Representatives from each Faculty
• Student representation (PGR representative and Education Secretary of
University Union)
• Groups to address various matters.
Board Works Through:
• Faculty Graduate School Committees
• Postgraduate Research Tutors
• Research Student Administration
Graduate Board Terms of
Reference (Summary)
•
Recommendations to Senate
•
Formulation and implementation of policies and
procedures
•
Maintenance of quality and standards
•
Communication with Learning and Teaching Board and
other University committees
•
Identification, promotion and facilitation of skills
development
•
Delegation of authority to its Groups (e.g. Examinations
Group ratifies examination results and awards degrees)
Graduate Board Terms of
Reference (Summary) continued
• Approval of new programmes of study and amendments to
regulations
• Liaison with LUU and other relevant student bodies
• Oversight of Scholarships for postgraduate students
Graduate Board definition of
role of the Postgraduate Tutor
The Postgraduate Tutor has general responsibility for
• Co-ordinating admissions
• Pastoral care
• Recording progress of research students
• (including monitoring of attendance with absence being recorded)
• For liaison with Research Student Administration
Qualities Required for PGRT’s
Diplomat / Negotiator
Approachable
Realist / Decision Maker
Guardians of quality for the University
Administrator / Manager
PGRT Role and
Responsibilities
To the School / Faculty / University
• Ensure Code of Practice* is in place and acted upon to
ensure:
 recruitment of the highest quality PGR students
 monitoring of candidatures and supervisory arrangements
To the students
• Look after the best interests of student
 this may mean taking difficult decisions as well as pastoral care
*CoP defines responsibilities of Deans, Faculty Graduate School Committees, Postgraduate
Research Tutors, Supervisors, Students
University-facing
Responsibilities
To the Graduate Board and its groups
• Ensure that University policy is observed
• Respond to any issues raised
• Participate in dialogue and discussions
Research Student Administration
• Liaison with various sections and keep up to date with memos
Postgraduate Scholarships
• Role in selection procedures for School nominations for University and
external competitions
Appeal Groups
• May have to appear before University panels
Faculty-facing
Responsibilities
To Faculty Graduate School Committees
• Usually a member (but always should have access to discussions on
policy and procedures)
• Responsible to the Director of the Faculty Graduate School
• Support requests for suspensions/extensions, special cases etc.
School-facing
Responsibilities
Support Staff
• Ensure that the appropriate systems are in place to deliver effective
administration and monitoring
Link with Head of School
• in ensuring maintenance of quality in admissions
• in dealing with difficult / serious issues involving students and also
staff
• as a source of human resources information.
• Build a relationship – report regularly.
Student-facing
Responsibilities
• Support for students throughout the lifecycle of their candidature
• Difficulties with supervisors (in observing University / School
procedures, inadequate supervision, supervisory arrangements)
• Difficulties with students (ensure that action is taken, where appropriate,
and formal warnings issued if progress is unsatisfactory, complaints by
students are handled speedily and fairly, etc)
• Able to provide advice on ethical review and other procedures such as
transfer, progress, thesis submission and examination
Admissions – A crucial stage
• Is the applicant of the appropriate quality?
• Do the appropriate facilities and expertise exist for the research project?
(NB. Code of Practice states the minimum requirements for facilities)
• Has the application been considered / discussed by at least two people?
• Where practical an interview should be held (telephone, Skype for
international)
• Be aware of the different categories of research degrees and special
nature of the Masters by Research
• Ensure supervisors are eligible for the role - see RSA website
• Ensure English language requirements are met - see RSA website
 Recent change to University’s minimum English language
requirements as a result of UKBA revised arrangements for Tier 4
visas.
Minimum English Language
Requirements
For entry to research degree study (need to conform to UKBA
requirements)
IELTS - Overall score must be 6.0 (University requirement)
• But UKBA say not less than 5.5 in each component (listening, reading
and speaking and writing)
Internet Based TOEFL (iBT)
• 87 (Overall)
• 21 (Listening and Writing)
• 22 (Reading)
• 23 (Speaking)
Supervisors
• Staff must attend an SDDU course on Research Degree
Supervision before being recommended for appointment as
a supervisor
 Includes experienced staff who are new to Leeds
 Full day course for those new to the role
 Briefing course for experienced supervisors
• Supervision by a main supervisor and at least one other cosupervisor; or one main supervisor together with a
Mentor/Adviser
When a student starts
Registration
• Ensure that the appropriate administrative arrangements are in place for
students to complete online registration (NB. 1st year International
students must provide sponsor letter to Accounts Receivable)
Personal Development Record (now online for 2011-12)
• Responsibility for ensuring that this is created and maintained for each
student:
 training needs analysis (within one month of commencement and to
be reviewed at least annually)
 record of training and development undertaken
 records of official supervisory meetings.
Monitoring
Monitoring Attendance (UKBA requirements)
• Ensure appropriate arrangements are in place for monitoring attendance
with absence being reported
Supervision Meetings (online PDRS)
• Ensure notes are kept and they are “fit for purpose”
• Reservations about progress must be recorded so that students are
aware
• PGRT to take action where appropriate
Annual Meeting
• Student to have the opportunity to meet with the Postgraduate Research
Tutor in the absence of supervisors
Engaging research students with
research ethics and impact
• Research Student Handbook describes student responsibility for ethical
review and approval
• The code of practice for research degree candidatures covers student
and supervisor responsibilities for ethics
• 2011/12 learning outcomes make reference to research ethics
• Research ethics and societal impact are covered in training
• Schools should encourage students to undertake ethics training
where salient ethical issues are known to potentially exist
• Schools are strongly encouraged to run a dedicated training event on
the impact and ethical implications of research
• Ethics checks are in place on forms at transfer and exam entry
• Some schools require ethics and wider societal impact to be covered at
the transfer and final examination
Monitoring (cont.)
• Students to consult their supervisor before undertaking any
additional work at the University
• 10 supervision meetings a year for those who first registered
in or after September 2005.
• It is advised that overtime students continue to receive the
same number of supervision meetings (these could be via
email, skype etc.)
• Supervisors responsible for ensuring that there are written
records of formal supervisory meetings
Transfer 1
Transfer from provisional category to full degree (PhD)
• Ensure that all time scales and procedures are in place and a transfer
report is produced
 Guidelines sent to students
 Again PDRS will support this
• Transfer Panel – constitution and procedures (see RSA website)
 At least 2 people from same or cognate subject area or discipline
 One of these must be independent of the research
Transfer 2
• Possible decisions
 Pass – may require some additional work (clear deadline)
 Defer - to 18 months after the date of commencement of study
 MPhil
 Withdraw
• Time should be allowed for full-time students to make corrections or do
additional work and have transfer confirmed within 12 months
• Transfer Recommendation Form to be completed
 Covers ethical review and safeguarding data
Extensions and suspensions
• Explained fully on page 33 – 34 of the ‘Guide for Research Degree
Supervisors 2010-11’
• Requests for indefinite suspensions
 Unlikely to be granted. 12 months might be approved and might be
extended after a review at the end of 12 months
• Requests will not succeed when the full-time period of study has been
completed, the student is in the overtime period and is now in full-time
employment and makes the request on the basis of “pressure of work”
• Must be clear relation between the amount of extra time being requested
and the problem encountered
• Legitimate reasons include ill health (of candidate or close relative),
maternity, accidents, unexpected events (e.g. equipment not being
delivered)
Year 4 of a Full-Time PhD
Usually ‘Overtime Period’ (but now some 4-year full-time
programmes)
No HEFCE funding for the University if a 3-year programme
No funding for schools
BUT…candidate still entitled to supervision
Examinations 1
• Supervisors to read and comment on the whole of the draft
thesis prior to submission provided it is made available by
the student in reasonable time
• “Mock viva” to be provided when requested by the student
• At least one internal and one external examiner
• Criteria for appointment of Internal and External Examiners
– see RSA website
Examinations 2
Recommendation of Examiners on behalf of School
• Ensure that the proposed examiners meet University criteria
• Avoid excessive use of external examiners (particularly by the same research
group/supervisor)
• Staff must attend an SDDU training course on the Role of the Internal Examiner before
being recommended for appointment as an internal examiner
• Includes experienced staff who are new to Leeds
• Staff should also have passed probation
• Refresher training is compulsory if a member of staff has not
• either acted as Internal Examiner
• or attended the SDDU training course on the role
within the last 60 months
• Face to face course for those new to the role
• Online briefing available for experienced internal examiners
Examinations 3
• Examiners required to complete independent reports prior to the oral
• Supervisors may be an observer at the examination but if not present
must be available for consultation
Examiners Reports
• Does the report adequately explain whether the criteria have been met?
If not, clarify with Examiners
• Is there a pattern to referral/failures?
• Particular supervisors / research groups?
• Any issues for Head of School/Director of Graduate School?
• All enquiries from the Examinations Group will be sent to PGRTs for
resolution
Submission and Qualification
• It is in the interests of all concerned for a research student
to complete their research degree
• The University and external bodies, such as HESA collect
data on “submissions” and “qualifications”
• HEFCE use to influence funding decisions; low rates
investigated
• All students leaving before or at the 12 month point do not
count in “submission” rate or “qualification” rate statistics
• Those permitted to proceed into the second year do count
• Both the AHRC and ESRC impose sanctions on those with
poor “submission” rates
Submission Rates
Starters in 11/05-10/06
Full-time students
Faculty Withdrew Started Submitted Suspensions Granted Non Submit
in Year 1 in Year within 4
of study Extensions as FT PHD
2
years
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
Arts
7
41
53.7
12.2
26.8
7.3
PVAC
3
22
45.5
22.7
18.2
13.6
ESSL
1
43
48.8
23.3
16.3
11.6
Bio Sci
4
67
80.6
3.0
10.4
6.0
Env
2
57
43.9
17.5
26.3
12.3
MAPS
12
70
75.7
7.1
7.1
10.0
Eng
12
111
52.3
12.6
26.1
9.0
M&H
9
32
62.5
15.6
12.5
9.4
LUBS
1
13
84.6
15.4
0.0
0.0
Total
45
456
60.1
12.7
18.0
9.2
Doctoral studetns qualifying
after 6 years (%)
HEFCE Qualification Rates
95
90
Southampton
Bristol
Imperial
York
Nottingham
Sheffield
Manchester
Leeds
85
80
75
70
1999/00
2000/01
2001/02
Start year
2002/03
(Data for full-time home and EU doctoral students)
Qualification Rates
• HEFCE will monitor “qualification rates” in HESA returns
• The time that students take to obtain their qualifications
• If concern, QAA to investigate
• Account taken of discipline, mode of study, local
conditions
• Funding implications
Funding for UK/EU Students
Census date for registration
• 1st December
• No income unless student registered
Allocation to resource centres based on
• Cost weight of subject
Postgraduate research student funding frequently asked
questions
• www.leeds.ac.uk/appo/RAM/PGRFaq.pdf
Home/EU Full-time UK/EU Research
Student Funding Rates 10/11 Standard
Fees charged
Research
cost band
Weight- HEFCE
ing
component
(£)
Tuition
Gross
Central
fee com- allocation charges
ponent
(£)
(£)
(£)
Net
allocation
(£)
High cost
laboratory
subjects
1.6
5468
3392
8859
1868
6991
Intermediate
cost
laboratory
subjects
1.3
4442
3392
7834
1822
6012
Others
1.0
3417
3392
6809
1776
5033
[Academic Planning and Performance Office, www.leeds.ac.uk/appo/RAM/Rates1011.pdf]
Handover
• Ensure that appropriate handover material and advice is available to
your successor.
Take-home message
The role of the Postgraduate Research Tutor may be
summarised as:
• the enhancement of research quality and research culture
within their School, Department or Unit
• the University is committed, as part of its Research
Strategy, to increasing the numbers of research students,
but not at the expense of quality.
• BEWARE pressure to make offers to funded students that
do not meet the University’s entrance requirements or who
wish to research in areas that cannot be adequately
supported
Postgraduate Research
Tutors Forum 2011
Part 2
Overview
• Recent Developments and general issues
• Changes
• Reminders
• Enhancements
• Work of the Postgraduate Research Funding Oversight Committee
• Postgraduate Research Student Experience (PRES)
• Personal Development Record System
Recent Developments
Dr Peter Gardner
Jackie Findlay
Changes
English Language Requirements
Immediate – June 2011
• Minimum University English Language Entry requirements
increased in line with UKBA (Tier 4 Visa requirements).
• Now overall IELTS 6 with at least 5.5 in each component
(reading, Writing, Speaking, Listening).
• More details available on RSA website for other English
language tests
• Some Schools already have English Language
requirements above the new University minimum
requirements.
Code of Practice for Research Degree
Candidatures 2011-12
• PGR Tutors must report to a formal Committee or other
body in the School as well as to the Faculty Graduate
School Committee
• The admissions team should consider any potential ethical
issues with the research area proposed
• Responsibility of supervisors to make students aware of
ethical procedures and ethical review
• Members of transfer panels must be from a cognate subject
area or discipline to the work submitted by a student.
Transfer procedure reminders
• The transfer panels for fulltime students must take
place within the first 12
months.
• Deferral can only be
approved for a period up to
18 months from the date of
commencement of study
• Outcomes can be
• Outcomes after deferral can
be:
• Transfer to PhD
• Transfer to MPhil
• Transfer to PhD
• Deferral of a decision
• Transfer to MPhil
• Requirement to withdraw from
the University
• Requirement to withdraw from
the University
Transfer procedure from 2011-12
• Where work submitted after deferral is considered
unsatisfactory and the transfer panel is considering transfer
to MPhil or a requirement to withdraw from the University:
• ALL CANDIDATES IN THIS POSITION MUST BE
OFFERED A SECOND TRANSFER INTERVIEW
Suspensions/Extensions of
Study from 2011-12
• The definitions for “suspensions of study” and “extensions of study” have
been redefined. More details in “Policies” on RSA website.
“Suspension of Study”
Period of interrupted study – student leaves temporarily and loses
their registration status. (eg illness (with medical certificates),
bereavement, maternity, etc)
“Extension of Study”
Lengthening of candidature to take account of a period of disruption of
studies. Student will not leave the programme but will progress more
slowly. (eg equipment breakdown, recovery from surgery, etc)
For International Students
from 2011-12
UKBA expects international students on long term
suspensions to return to their country of origin (can remain
in UK for only up to 60 days).
Unsatisfactory Academic Progress
procedures from 2012-13
• Graduate Board has agreed that a new procedure will be
introduced for PGR students.
• Discussions will take place early next session with Faculty
Graduate School Committees on draft procedures.
• Criteria will include (among others)
• failure to adhere to University attendance monitoring requirements
• failure to attend specified English language training
• failure to attend training which has been specified within the
student’s training plan
Engaging research students with
research ethics and impact
• Research Student Handbook describes student responsibility for ethical
review and approval
• The code of practice for research degree candidatures covers student
and supervisor responsibilities for ethics
• 2011/12 learning outcomes make reference to research ethics
• Research ethics and societal impact are covered in training
• Schools should encourage students to undertake ethics training
where salient ethical issues are known to potentially exist
• Schools are strongly encouraged to run a dedicated training event on
the impact and ethical implications of research
• Ethics checks are in place on forms at transfer and exam entry
• Some schools require ethics and wider societal impact to be covered at
the transfer and final examination
Support for disabled research
students 2011-12
• Research Student Handbook and Guide for Research
Degree Supervisors to contain more information about
support for students with disabilities
• Leaflets for PGR students with disabilities and for
supervisors
• Disability section on RSA website
More detailed information contained in the PGRT Forum Information Booklet
On-line registration for degree
ceremonies
• All students now have to register their graduation choice
(July, December, in absentia) on-line at
http:www.leeds.ac.uk/ceremonies/conferment
• Full instructions are given to postgraduate research
students by RSA on thesis submission receipt, follow-up
email and award letter.
• Replaces previous paper-based registration process.
Dean of Postgraduate
Research Studies
Professor Paul Harrison
Main responsibilities
• Increase external income from PGR students
• Ensure we attract the best PGR student to Leeds
• Enhance the overall PGR student experience
• Raise the visibility and profile of PGR both internally and externally
Transferable Skills Training
Researcher Training Group
• Chaired by Professor Steve Scott
• Recommending post “Roberts” approach
Faculty facing teams
• MAPS/ENG/Env
• FBS/M&H
• Arts/PVAC/ESSL/LUBS
Process of reorganising people currently ongoing
Home/EU Full-time UK/EU Research
Student Funding Rates 10/11 Standard
Fees charged
Research
cost band
Weight- HEFCE
ing
component
(£)
Tuition
Gross
Central
fee com- allocation charges
ponent
(£)
(£)
(£)
Net
allocation
(£)
High cost
laboratory
subjects
1.6
5468
3392
8859
1868
6991
Intermediate
cost
laboratory
subjects
1.3
4442
3392
7834
1822
6012
Others
1.0
3417
3392
6809
1776
5033
[Academic Planning and Performance Office, www.leeds.ac.uk/appo/RAM/Rates1011.pdf]
Reminders
Appointment of Supervisors
• Postgraduate Research Tutors have delegated
responsibility for recommendations for the appointment of
supervisors. Close contact is needed with the Head of
School on HR matters.*
• The criteria may need review soon in relation to new
national legislation upon retirement issues as well as the
University VLS scheme.
• The PGRT has responsibility for ensuring that suitable
supervisory arrangements are in place throughout the
candidature.
* “Eligibility for Research Degree Supervision” – under “Policies” on
RSA website.
Appointment of Supervisors
If a sole supervisor is scheduled to leave before the
candidature is completed, the School is asked to consider
the situation and, if appropriate, provide an assurance that
appropriate supervision will be put in place should the
supervisor leave. Alternatively they may wish to
recommend that a co-supervisor be appointed.
Recognising Research
Excellence in Doctoral Theses
• Since September 2010 examiners have been invited to
comment on ‘research excellence’ identified in thesis/oral
examination
• Reflects ‘outstanding’ achievement over and above that
expected for award of degree (see booklet for more detail)
• Straight pass/minor editorial corrections only
• Examinations Group endorse – candidate will receive letter of
congratulations from PVC for Research
• During 2010/11 session 5 cases have been endorsed by the
Group
Submission of eTheses
•
Applies to doctoral awards only
•
Mandatory for all students who commenced study from
September 2009 onwards
•
The eThesis must be submitted to RSA after examination
and after all corrections have been approved by the
Examiner(s)
•
The submission to RSA consists of
•
•
A completed Thesis Deposit Form
•
The hard bound version of the thesis
•
The eThesis (pdf format) which is identical in content to the bound version
Relevant supervisors and students should be reminded of
the mandatory arrangements
Enhancement Activity
Recruitment of high quality
students and subsequent support
Recommendations currently under discussion for support of
students
• More effective monitoring of PGR intake; better screening of quality;
interviews at application stage prior to acceptance
• Possible 6 month assessment to identify where additional support is
required and training needs reviewed
• More thorough diligence in the transfer process; support packages
for “borderline cases”
• Full-time students entering Year 3 to produce a plan for completing
the research. Reminders to students that the final year is
commencing
Recruitment of high quality
students and subsequent support
Recommendations for consideration in Schools for raising
awareness
• Assess implications and impact of non-completion and extended
completion-times eg
o risks to research council funds
o practical implications for schools – desk space,
o supervisors’ time
• Dissemination of good practice by Schools with particularly high
qualification rates within their Faculties and cognate disciplines
Enhancement Activity
• Referred students are less likely to obtain their
qualifications; supervisors to be reminded of responsibilities
(minimum 5 supervision meetings during the referral period)
• Possibility of tightening requirements with regard to English
language proficiency for those whose first language is not
English (being explored by Programmes of Study and Audit
Group)
PG Research Tutors Forum July 2011
The Postgraduate Funding Oversight Committee
Professor Mike Wilson
Background
The University’s Postgraduate Research Project, under the sponsorship
of the PVC Research and Innovation identified the following as strategic
priorities:
Increasing the intake of high-quality PGR students
The acquisition of funding for PGR students
The use of its resources to support its strategic objectives in PGR
The need to compete successfully for ‘centres of excellence’.
Background
In the light of this:
The Postgraduate Funding Oversight Committee
(PGRFOC) was convened on 15th February 2011 to align
and coordinate activity funding-relates activity, and to
support the University and Faculties to grow externally
funded PGR activity
PGFOC reports to Graduate Board, Research Board and
the Research & Innovation Theme Team
Terms of Reference (paraphrased)
Receive reports on PGR funding
Identify performance gaps
Provide an oversight of external funding opportunities
Make recommendations as to the future deployment of
university resources
Prepare and position the University to bid for centres of
excellence
Membership
Karen Innis (Marketing Director, Faculty of Engineering)
Prof Anne Kerr (Pro-Dean R, ESSL, leader of ESSL White Rose Bid) 
Prof Ian Kirkpatrick (Grad School Director, LUBS)
Prof Steve Marsden (Pro Dean R&I, MaPS)
Caroline Neave (Senior Administrator, PG Scholarships, RSA)
Katy Sargeant (Finance Manager, Engineering)
Prof Edward Spiers (PGR Project Director, Director BGP) 
Prof David Westhead (Grad School Director, FBS)
Prof Mike Wilson (Dean, MaPS) 
PGRFOC activities
Oversight of funding opportunities
Oversight of success in securing external funding
Oversight of PGR funding performance →
performance gaps → supporting strategies
PGRFOC activities
Recommend ways to achieve better leverage and
marketing impact from the deployment of
University’s resources
Oversee the development and establishment of a
new, targeted approach to allocation of internal
funding for PGR
PGRFOC activities
Identify ways to prepare and position the University
to bid for centres of excellence (e.g. BGP, DTC)
PGRFOC activities
Any questions?
Postgraduate Research Experience
Survey
Dr Heather Sears
Postgraduate Development Record
System (PDRS)
Sally Edwards
Steve Paxton
PDR system – functions & benefits
• allow supervisors’ and PGRTs easier access and overview
• web-based, securely accessible off campus
• allow for electronic sign off of key documents
• allow joint supervisors share information more easily
• Indicate and remind about ‘milestone activities’
• provide a record of progress and supervision
• provide reports
• Easy for postgraduate researchers and supervisors to use
• replace paper-based processes.
PDR system – Update
• User teams in faculties and schools
• Current user testing
• Training 18 – 29 July to administrators and PGRTs
• Available and schools and faculties in August, live from September
www.leeds.ac.uk/student_processes_project/pdrs/index.html
[email protected]
Training sessions - [email protected]