Quantifying British Secularization: A Case Study of the Bible

Download Report

Transcript Quantifying British Secularization: A Case Study of the Bible

Quantifying British
Secularization: A Case Study of
the Bible
Presentation to Bible Society, 4 February 2015
By Clive D. Field
Universities of Birmingham and Manchester
Overview
CONTEXT
• About me – 3
• British Religion in Numbers – 4
• Sources of Religious Statistics – 5
• Sample surveys – 6
• Measures of secularization – 7
• Religious authority – 8
THE BIBLE
• Scope – 9
• Ownership – 10
• Readership – 11
• Knowledge – 12
• Literalism – 13
• Beliefs – 14
• Attitudes – 15
• Demographics – 16
• Conclusions – 17
2
Context – About Me
• Historian by background but working at interface between humanities and
social sciences
• Research and publishing for 40 years in social history and sociology of
religion in Britain from 1689 to the present
• Particular focus on statistical sources and measurement of religious change
• Full list of research outputs at https://clivedfield.wordpress.com/
• Contributed book section on non-recurrent Christian data to Reviews of UK
Statistical Sources: Religion (Pergamon Press for ESRC/RSS, 1987)
• Next major output Britain’s Last Religious Revival? (Palgrave Macmillan,
March 2015) investigating religious change during ‘long 1950s’
• Co-director (with David Voas, University of Essex) since 2008 of British
Religion in Numbers (BRIN)
3
Context – British Religion in Numbers
• Core funded 2008-10 by AHRC/ESRC, as part of Religion and Society Programme, since 2014
also British Academy Research Project
• Hosted at Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, although
project team now virtual and voluntary
• Serves academics, faith communities, policy makers, media, and general public
• Microblogging news sub-site – over 700 posts since 2010, 51 by me in 2014 alone, featuring
307 individual stories
• Fully searchable and annually updated catalogue of sources of British religious statistics since
1603, with 2,400 entries at present
• Charts, maps, and tables (subject to copyright), including tables in Churches and Churchgoers
(Clarendon Press, 1977) and compendium of Gallup data, plus sundry other features
• Around 700,000 page views since 2010 by 250,000 unique users, principally UK and US
4
Context – Sources of Religious Statistics
• Faith communities
Denominational
Ecumenical
• State
Censuses
Solemnization of marriage
Sample surveys
• Academic/social research agencies
Opinion polls
Academic-led surveys
5
Context – Sample Surveys
• First systematically explored by me in 1980s through a British Academy
small grant and research for Reviews of UK Statistical Sources: Religion
• Surveys have the potential cost-effectively to fill in gaps in our knowledge
and develop a more balanced portfolio of measures of secularization
• But surveys of religion present a range of methodological and
interpretative challenges, including:
Tendency to over-claim on most measures of believing and belonging
Relatively high proportion of ‘don’t knows’
Difficulty in getting representative samples of religious minorities
Difficulty in asking ‘neutral’ and ‘objective’ questions
Tendency to be influenced/driven by events
6
Context – Measures of Secularization
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Saliency of religion
Religious affiliation
Church membership
Church attendance
Participation in rites of passage
Other religious practices
Religious beliefs (orthodox and heterodox)
Religious prejudice
Respect for religious authority
Institutional measures
7
Context – Religious Authority
• Mark Chaves in Social Forces 72:3 (1994): ‘secularization is best
understood not as the decline of religion, but as the declining scope
of religious authority’
• Hitherto approach mainly pursued through studies of public
perceptions of religious institutions in US
• My study of changing public attitudes to Churches and clergy in
Britain since 1960s in Contemporary British History 28:2 (2014)
• My study of changing public attitudes to Bible in Britain since Second
World War in Journal of Contemporary Religion 29:3 (2014)
8
The Bible - Scope
• Meta-analytical attempt to quantify ‘Bible-centricism’ using a basket of
believing and behaving measures
• 123 national sample surveys and 35 national and local sample surveys of
adult religious populations (research also available on children/young)
• Covers 1948-2013, with most data from last 30 years of the period
• Gallup apart, relatively few genuine time series, raising issues of
comparability
• Includes Bible Society research where findings had been made public or
otherwise shared with the author, but does not discuss Bible versions
• Analysis at topline and by gender, age, social class, religious denomination,
and churchgoing
• Article constrained by journal’s tight rules on length
9
The Bible - Ownership
HEADLINE
• Household ownership of the Bible has slumped, while individual
ownership has been largely passive (the product of handed-down
copies or presents), despite the advent of modern translations
COMMENTS
• Household ownership has fallen from around 90% after Second World
War to 50% today
• Individual ownership has been at a lower level than household
ownership, has also fallen, but figures are more erratic
10
The Bible - Readership
HEADLINE
• Readership of the Bible has declined, with only around one in ten
reading it at least weekly and three-quarters less than once a year or
never
COMMENTS
• Statistics cannot be independently validated and are probably subject
to over-claiming, arising from ‘prestige effect
• Many different frequencies of reading have been used
11
The Bible - Knowledge
HEADLINE
• Knowledge of the content of the Bible is immensely variable (some
parts being better recalled than others), but, overall, it is decreasing
COMMENT
• 61% could name the four gospels in 1949, 48% in 1999, while the
number knowing none increased from 25% to 43% respectively
12
The Bible - Literalism
HEADLINE
• Only a small and dwindling minority believes the Bible to be true,
word for word, the rest arguing that it needs to be ‘interpreted’ or
dismissed as a collection of fables and legends
COMMENTS
• Proportion believing Old Testament mostly a collection of stories and
fables rose from 22% in 1960 to 45% in 1993
• Proportion believing New Testament mostly a collection of stories and
fables rose from 13% in 1960 to 40% in 1993
13
The Bible - Beliefs
HEADLINE
• Key storylines in the Bible – Creation, Virgin Birth, gospel miracles,
Resurrection – have been progressively rejected as historically
inaccurate and/or understood in a figurative sense or disbelieved
entirely
COMMENT
• Evolutionary beliefs have especially gained ground in past 20 years,
but many see no contradiction in believing in both scientific and
religious explanations for the origin of life on earth
14
The Bible - Attitudes
HEADLINES
• The Bible has been viewed as increasingly less significant in personal
lives and less relevant to the needs of modern society
• People do not necessarily view the diminished status of the Bible as
incompatible with, or undermining, Christian faith – the latter is
consciously or sub-consciously redefined so that it becomes less
dependent upon an ‘orthodox’ use and reading of the Bible
15
The Bible - Demographics
HEADLINES
• Women are somewhat more Bible-centric than men, the over-65s than the
under-25s, and the DE than the AB social group
• Christians are marginally more likely than average to be Bible-centric and
much more so than those professing no religion
• Protestants generally and Free Church affiliates particularly are more Biblecentric than Catholics (apart from some indicators of literalism)
• Regular churchgoers are significantly more Bible-centric than adults as a
whole and still more so than non-churchgoers, with evangelical
churchgoers perhaps most Bible-centric
• Notwithstanding, churchgoers have not been immune from declining Biblecentricism, and, overall, they are a diminishing sub-population
16
The Bible – Conclusions
• There has been declining allegiance to the Bible on various fronts, even
among regular churchgoers
• This decline is mostly in line with falls in other religious performance
indicators, so is in part a consequence/symptom of secularization
• However, the upward slope of Bible-centricism from one cohort to the next
suggests a predominantly generational effect which may not be reversible
• This effect reflects the waning influence of the three traditional agencies of
religious socialization – church/Sunday school, state school, parents
• A debating point is whether Christianity is becoming decoupled in everyday
life from the holy book on which it is founded, and whether that matters
for the future of Christianity
17
Contact Details
BRITISH RELIGION IN NUMBERS
• Website - http://www.brin.ac.uk
• Twitter - https://twitter.com/BritRelNumbers
CLIVE FIELD
• Email - [email protected] or [email protected]
• Website - https://clivedfield.wordpress.com/
18