Transcript Slide 1
Introduction to research Kate Waller Information Manager Primary vs Secondary research Primary • Data collected by you (or on your behalf) • Specific to your needs and you control the quality • Usually costs more and takes longer Secondary • Existing data that has been collected and analysed by someone else e.g. Census, other peoples surveys – Desk research • Usually cheap and quick • Data can be too old and not specific enough for your needs The choice likely to be determined by time, budget and the need you are trying to demonstrate Secondary data sources Surrey-i: Open data source Area profiles: CCG, Local Authority, Ward, Lower Super Output area A treasure trove of information • Has a wide range of information and should be your first port of call for open data from government sources and Surrey's public service organisations. Surrey-i is also home to: – Census data e.g. age, ethnicity, carers, disability – Future populations predictions (POPPI, PANSI) – Joint Strategic Needs Assessment – Surrey Residents Survey – School Census – Mosaic Public Sector Interactive Guide – Community Foundation for Surrey: Surrey Uncovered – Active People Survey: Sport England – Voluntary, Community and Faith sector page The VCFS Page: Sharing best practice Other information sources • Projecting Older People Population Information – www.poppi.org.uk • Projecting Adult Needs and Services Information – www.pansi.org.uk • Public Health Observatories (Part of Public Health England) – www.apho.org.uk • ONS (Office of National Statistics) – www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk • Official labour market statistics – www.nomisweb.co.uk Other sources of information • National charities – NCVO – NAVCA • Universities and Think Tanks – The King’s Fund – New Philanthropy Capital – New Economics Foundation • Fellow VCFS organisations in Surrey Be sure about the credibility of your data source. Have you heard of them? How have they compiled the data? Judging quality of secondary data • What methods were used to obtain the data? – How many people were interviewed? – Where were they living? – Is there a copy of the original survey? • Is the information current or out-of-date? • Does the author provide references for the data and information reported? • Do the numbers make sense? The more confidence you have in your data the better equipped you are to argue your case. Remember to quote the source Reassures the reader about the credibility of the data; provides an important link to the original methodology Let your data tell a story • For the most part secondary research is used to prove or disprove something • If you are writing a case for support use the most motivating data you can – You don’t have to include everything you find on a subject/client group • Statistics should form part of your narrative and not simply be thrown in because you know them Before embarking on secondary research know what your objectives are Primary data Primary data: Quantitative v Qualitative Quantitative e.g. surveys • Gathering answers to fixed (closed) questions • From a large number of people – 100+ • Measures the incidence of views and opinions • Provides statistically valid results • Results provided in the form of tabulations, quoting actual percentages Qualitative • Specifically uncovers thoughts and opinions • Exploratory, investigative and descriptive • Normally conducted with relatively small numbers of people • Unstructured or semistructured (open) questions • Not statistically valid or a measurement tool When to use Quantitative To measure e.g. how many people have used a service, the number of female v male users etc Qualitative To explore e.g. what do people value about a service, what impact has it had on their lives Quantitative data collection: The survey • The survey method you choose will depend on your audience, objectives, budget and timescale – Face-to-face – Postal – Telephone – Online – Omnibus 87% of grant holders state that they use questionnaires/surveys as a method of evaluation Based on a survey of 404 grant holders from across the UK commissioned by the Big Lottery Fund Quantitative research tips • You will only gets answers to the questions you ask – Make sure all questions fit with you overall objectives for the research/what you are being asked to measure – Avoid unnecessary questions • Think about the person answering the questions – Test your survey if you can • Beware of survey fatigue – Don’t over-survey your audience – Minimize respondent effort – Write good questions The better the research/evaluation design the more reliable the responses/evidence Write good questions • Ask questions whose answers you plan to use • Ask as few questions as possible to get the information you need – Don’t ask questions for which there is already data available • Ask questions that can be answered meaningfully • Avoid leading questions – Do you appreciate our service a little or a lot? • Where possible use multiple choice responses – It is more effort to write in a box! – Make sure the you cover all options Qualitative data collection: The chat • • • • • One-to-one interviews Paired interviews Focus groups Intercepted interviews Ethnographic techniques The benefit of qualitative research is that it can often uncover things you would never have thought of asking Qualitative research can be more than anecdotal • Conducted by an independent moderator – Avoid bias • Research participants are selected at random – Not just your best friends! • All interviews are taped and transcribed – The original data source is kept and made available for scrutiny • Analysis is rigorous and methodical e.g. grid analysis – Again, making it open to scrutiny The more robust the methodology the more credible the findings Example of grid analysis Ethnographic research • Ethnographic research is a catch-all to describe research approaches that: – Stress watching and observing as much as listening and talking – Assess behaviour as well as opinion – Connect with people in real ‘contexts’ • Designed to address some of the limitations of qualitative techniques In-depth encounters • Useful approach to understand behaviour • Participants are asked to keep a diary/scrapbook on a subject, take photos etc • A week later, conduct a depth interview at the participants’ home • Diary/scrapbook is used as stimulus • Illuminates behaviour and perceptions Accompanied activities • • • • Great method to understand experience Researcher accompanies participant on activity Unlocks insights into behaviour Observing people in the right context Encouraging participation in research • People’s time is valuable • May need to offer some form of incentive to encourage participation • Incentives help attract those who may not usually engage – Prize draw – Cash or in-kind • ALWAYS give a clear indication of the purpose of the research and what will happen with the information – Thank people for taking part – Offer to send a summary report Good primary research is about engaging with an audience Reporting primary data Reference the methodology • 8 focus groups with current and lapsed services users revealed………. • A telephone survey of 500 current service users conducted in March 2014….. Don’t forget the sample size Don't know, Decrease 3% significantly Increase significantly , 29% Stay the same, 33% Increase slightly, 34% BASE: 300 Reference the methodology and sample size will reassure the reader that the research is recent, relevant and robust