AJ 104 Chapter 5 - Rio Hondo College
Download
Report
Transcript AJ 104 Chapter 5 - Rio Hondo College
AJ 104 Chapter 5
Witnesses
5 Issues Related to a Trial
Witness
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Who is competent to testify
How the credibility of a witness is attacked
What can be done if a witness has a faulty
memory
What a lay person is allowed to testify
about
How and when expert witnesses are used
Are You a Competent Witness?
Competent Witness Defined:
A person who:
1. Understands the duty to tell the truth
2. Can narrate the events in question
If a person is not competent they will not
be allowed to testify
Duty to Tell The Truth
The truth, the whole truth, and nothing
but the truth
Witness must understand the duty to tell
the truth and the consequences for not
telling the truth
Is a Bible or “swearing” necessary?
It becomes the duty of the jury to decide if
the witness is telling the truth
Duty to Tell The Truth
Exceptions
Children
Senility & Mental Illness
Cannot distinguish fact from fantasy
Inability to tell fact from fiction
Hypnosis
Some courts ruled that witnesses cannot testify
about things under hypnosis
Ability to Narrate
To be a witness, you must be able to
communicate with the judge and jury
about the events in question
Must be able to understand questions
Very young, Mentally challenged
Language Barriers/Foreign Language
Hearing Impaired
Procedure to Establish
Competency
If a witness’s competency is at issue a
hearing is held
Prior to taking the witness stand
Questions will be asked to determine
competency. “Voir Dire”
Two issues are determined at the hearing
The duty to tell the truth
The ability to narrate
Impeachment
The process of attacking the credibility
of a witness
A function of cross-examination
Designed to convince a jury they should
not believe the other side’s witness
There are six main methods of
impeachment:
Bias or Prejudice
If there is a bias or prejudice, it can be
inferred that they cannot testify
objectively.
Friendship
Hatred
I would do whatever I could to help
I hope he gets what coming to him
Family Ties
There’s nothing I wouldn’t do for my child
Bias or Prejudice
Other Examples include:
Racial Prejudice
Financial Gain
They “all” look/act/behave the same
Have you been compensated for damages
Motive
If I testify, they won’t file charges
Other Grounds for
Impeachment
Prior Felony Convictions
Uncharged Crimes and Immoral Acts
In some cases (rarely) judicial discretion
will allow felons to testify
Can be confusing & time consuming
Prior Inconsistent Statements
I said it then, but what I meant was…
Other Grounds for
Impeachment
Inability to observe – Physically/View
My Cousin Vinny
Reputation
Restricted to the trait of honesty (truth and
veracity) “I heard he was a liar”
The credibility of a witness is easily
diminished if it is shown that other people
believe the witness is a liar.
Rehabilitating a Witness
To restore the credibility of a witness
Once a witness has been impeached,
upon re-direct testimony, the attorney
will try to convince the jury their
witness was truthful.
Rehabilitation is the opposite of
impeachment, it attempts to focus on
good deeds.
Rehabilitation
Three Common Approaches:
(Inconsistent Statements)
Lying for a reason
Statement taken out of context
Introduce a statement before the
inconsistent statement
Rehabilitation Grounds
Good Behavior
Witness Currently Telling the Truth
I did that in the past, but not anymore
I was afraid that why I lied…..
Lack of Impairment by Handicap
Designed to show that handicap was not a
factor or grounds to impeach
“Even a deaf person can hear……..”
Rehabilitation Grounds
Use of Expert Witness
To confirm a piece of evidence crucial to
the case
Based on reputation
Use other witnesses to convince the jury
that they are the most credible regarding
reputation.
Corroboration
The credibility of a witness is stronger if
additional evidence can support the witness
testimony.
Accomplice testimony (mandatory)
Corroboration is different from cumulative
Corroborative confirms testimony by use of
another source
Cumulative repeats what was said.
Memory Failure
Occurs after long periods
Anything can be used to refresh
memory
Witnesses must be able to testify from
memory, not from what has been
refreshed.
Present Memory Refreshed Rule
Past Recollection Recorded
Exception
Exception to the Hearsay Rule:
Statement would be admissible if declarant
testified at the current trial.
Witness currently has insufficient present
recollection to testify fully and accurately
Report made at a time when the facts were
fresh in the memory of witnesses
Past Recollection Recorded
Exception
Report was made by the witnesses,
someone under his/her direction to
record the witness’s statements.
Witness can testify that the report is a
true statement of the facts.
Report is authenticated as accurate
Unavailable Witnesses
Death
Relocation
Hiding
Former testimony (under oath) can be
introduced at trial if the witness is not
available.
Types of Witnesses
A witness, someone who observed
something
Two types of witnesses
1. Lay
2. Expert
Types of Witnesses
A lay witness is a person who observed an
event that is relevant to the case on trial
Most people testify as lay witnesses
An expert witness is a person who is called
to testify about a relevant event based on
his/her special knowledge or training.
They allowed if some evidence is beyond the
understanding of the jury
Opinion Testimony of Lay
Witnesses
If the witness is not testifying as an
expert, his/her testimony in the form
of opinions is limited to opinions or
inferences which are:
1.
2.
Rationally based on the perception of the
witness
Helpful; to a clear understanding of the
witness’s testimony or the determination
of the facts in issue.
Expert Witness
In order to use an expert, a foundation must
be laid that establishes the following:
The jury needs the help of an expert
There is a recognized area of expertise that
applies
The person called to testify has the appropriate
background to qualify as an expert
Voir Dire
Uses of Expert Testimony
Insanity
Ballistics
?
Blood and Tissue Matching
?
?
Unlike lay witnesses, expert witnesses
may express professional opinions.