Transcript Slide 1
Public Goods and Common-Pool Resources 1 Characteristics of a Good Excludable: the property of a good whereby a person can be prevented from using it Rival: the property of a good whereby one person’s use diminishes other peoples’ use 2 Classification of Goods RIVAL Yes No Yes Private Goods Club Goods No Common-Pool Resources Public Goods EXCLUDABLE 3 Public Goods Non-rival and non-excludable The Free Rider Problem: Individuals have little (or no) incentive to pay for public goods because they can enjoy the benefits by free riding on the payments of others • Public goods result in market failure • The level of provision will be inefficiently low • Intuition follows from recognizing that provision generates a positive externality 4 Example: A Small Fireworks Display • • • • Assumptions Two individuals Identical demands for bottle rockets, Q = 4 – P P = 2 is the price per bottle rocket • What is the equilibrium quantity of bottle rockets? • What is the efficient quantity of bottle rockets? 5 The Efficient Quantity of a Public Good Because public goods are non-rival and non-excludable… • Solving for the efficient quantity requires a vertical summation of the individual demand curves • Then can set the SMB = MC Note: this is different from the horizontal summation with a private good 6 A Role for Government Intervention • Governments can provide public goods to correct the market failure (free rider problem) • Use tax revenues to provide a variety of public goods – Examples? • The level of government provision is greater than the level of free-market provision 7 Common-Pool Resources Rival and non-excludable “The Tragedy of the Commons”: Individuals have less incentive to take care of (or conserve) things that are commonly owned than things that they own themselves • C-P resources are susceptible to market failure • Inefficiently high levels of exploitation • Intuition follows form recognizing that use generates a negative externality 8 Example: An Open-Access Fishery 1. There is no way to stop people from fishing (non-excludability) 2. When one person catches a fish, it makes it hard for others to catch fish (rivalry) 3. People think “if I don’t catch the fish, someone else will” 4. The result is over-fishing 9 Possible Ways to Solve the “Tragedy” • Social Norms – “The Lobster Gangs of Maine” – Balinese rice temples • Establish property rights – Private ownership – Tradable fishing rights (individual transferable quotas, ITQs) 10